A FAREWELL TO ARMS: Blu-ray (Selznick/2oth Century-Fox 1957) Kino Lorber
Let’s face it,
by the time veteran producer extraordinaire, David O. Selznick undertook the
Herculean task to remake Ernest Hemingway’s immortal tale of love and war – A Farewell to Arms (1957) he hadn’t
made a picture in nearly nine years. It shows - the creakiness in Selznick’s scope
and candor negatively impacting an already popularized work of fiction,
regarded by many in the same reverence and hushed tones as The Holy Bible (or Gone With The Wind…); Selznick and his
favorite screenwriter, Ben Hecht doing their utmost to add girth, stature and
cinematic merit to Hemingway’s prose (not needed) but perhaps occasionally
wanting, given Hemingway’s approach to the novel. Indeed, so much of the epic
quality of the novel occurs in the reader’s mind; Hemingway calculatingly
structuring the high water marks in his prose around a series of decisions and
plot points merely inferred rather than spelled out with interminable descriptions.
Astutely, this makes A Farewell to Arms
exceptionally fine literature, open to interpretation – both vast and peculiar;
more than a dollop of both these un-endearing qualities on display in
Selznick’s weepy. Only this time it’s the critics left to their handkerchiefs
and hand-wringing. Realistically, all Selznick and Hecht have done is re-interpreted
Hemingway their way. It doesn’t work, chiefly because the choices made are
teetering on the verge of that same crying gag I once made while studying the
book in my second year English class – A
Farewell to Arms, an introduction to legs…other appendages optional. It
didn’t go over well then and sure as hell does not fly in the face of
Hemingway’s literary auteurs, even by 1957’s melodramatic standards. Lest we
forget, ’57 was the year of Peyton Place,
An Affair to Remember, and Raintree County; MGM’s gala days in
Dixie Southern reply to Selznick’s more fondly recalled Southern masterpiece.
In 1918 Ernest
Hemingway went off to war. In 1929 he published a book about it. In only his
second work, Hemingway’s A Farewell to
Arms spoke to a generation still reeling from the aftermath of WWI.
Critically, it was a blistering account of separation and personal sacrifice.
Selznick’s reconstitution of it makes valiant strides to bottle this fragile thread
bareness of love turned asunder by fate and the unanticipated tragedies of war.
But the real problem with the movie - Selznick
isn’t so much interested in re-making A
Farewell to Arms as in recapturing the glories of GWTW, right down to this picture’s main title sequence; bold,
emblazoned script dramatically trailing from left to right across the
Cinemascope expanse, set against a background of stills and location footage
shot by his second unit, in and around the Italian Alps. Selznick’s other
blunder is casting his second wife, Jennifer Jones as the tragic heroine, nurse
Catherine Barkley. Indeed, he was more blind than usual regarding Jones'
participation herein. When Hemingway learned of this casting decision, and was
equally informed by Selznick he would receive a $50,000 bonus from any profits
derived from the picture, the Nobel Laureate wired back his considerable
disdain, adding, “If, by some chance your
movie, which features the 38-year-old Mrs. Selznick as 24-year-old Catherine
Barkley, does succeed in earning $50,000, my suggestion to you is that you take
all the money to the local bank, have it converted into nickels, and then shove
them up your ass until they come out your mouth."
Ever since
Selznick had wooed Jones away from her first husband, Robert Walker in the
mid-1940's, he had plotted with Svengali-esque precision to will a career for
her on par with the great ladies of the movie screen. It never happened, and
this despite Jones’ first time out Oscar win for 1944’s The Song of Bernadette. Selznick saw Jones as the perfect putty by
which he could create a star. Alas, Selznick’s folly was his devotion to Jones;
his elephantine western, Duel in the Sun
(1946) and Portrait of Jennie
(1948); expensive blunders meant to add cache to Jones’ career and name as an ‘above the title’ star of the first
magnitude, rife for money-making loan outs elsewhere. And while Jones would continue to appear in
such high-profile movies as Madame
Bovary (1949), and, Love is a
Many-Splendored Thing (1953 and likely her best), she never found her
footing on such hallowed earth already occupied by the likes of other divas who
had done it all on their own. Selznick left Paramount in 1932, just as the
studio was preparing its own expensive production of A Farewell to Arms. Perhaps this accounted for his verve now to top
director, Frank Borzage’s minor effort then, costarring Helen Hayes and Gary
Cooper. Alas, the rights to the property since were held at Warner Bros.; the
studio desperate to release their own 1954 remake of Selznick’s original
non-musical, A Star is Born in the
foreign markets. As Selznick still retained the copyright for ‘Star’
a deal was struck, whereupon WB would relinquish rights to A Farewell to Arms in trade for Selznick’s release of the rights to
A Star is Born in Europe. In
retrospect, the really big problem for Selznick is Jennifer Jones: thirty-eight
and looking at least six years older – and ‘in Cinemascope’; hardly the ingénue
whom Hemingway describes as naïve, dynamic and beguiling. At times, Jones can
look like her head’s been used for a punching bag; her whisky drawl as though
some well-intended diction coach has just inserted too many marbles into her
mouth for the recital. It’s rather embarrassing to watch Jones leaning over a
shirtless Rock Hudson splayed across his hospital bed, whispering sweet nothings
in his ear, one high-heeled foot lazily rocking back and forth like the
stocking-sheathed pendulum of a clock; meant, I suppose to convey at least a
hint of the couple’s ardor.
As for Rock
Hudson; by 1957 he had miraculously established himself as a cut above the
other ‘young finds’ of the 1950’s; firm hunks du jour with more chiseled sex
appeal than craftsmanship behind their bods. Hudson had, in fact, delivered
high caliber performances in Magnificent
Obsession (1954), All That Heaven
Allows (1955) and Giant (1956),
the latter for which he received an Oscar-nomination as Best Actor. And Hudson
would continue to hone his craft well into the 1960s, even after his ‘stud factor’ began to cool; a testament
to other drawing powers at the box office. Alas, A Farewell to Arms does Hudson no favors. For one thing, the
character of Lt. Frederick Henry is immobilized almost at the start of our
story; gallantly wounded in both legs by shrapnel, leaving Hudson to emote some
of his most ardent love-making from a horizontal disadvantage. Worse, Selznick
and Hecht have concocted an utterly idiotic ‘screwball’ moment to set up this
second act; Henry carted off to the military hospital, repeatedly dropped,
dumped and otherwise manhandled by a semi-lucid/semi-drunk orderly; bounced
from stretcher to elevator, and finally, to bed; Hudson enduring the
indignation with a few scripted bitter outbursts that neither ingratiate his
character to the audience nor create a sense of legitimacy for the times and
severity as inferred throughout Hemingway’s novel. Hudson’s ambulance driver is
the least convincing cardboard cutout of the lot, incapable of adding any emotional
dimension to these windswept and war-torn landscapes, the real drama of war
neither reflected in his eyes or mirrored in any of his actions. One can almost
hear director, Charles Vidor shouting through a megaphone as though he were
directing a silent movie, “Okay, Rock.
Now you want to cry. But you don’t. You run for the bridge. Run, Rock, run!”
It is possible
Selznick had already tired of the project even before a single strip of film
was shot; his passion understandably dampened after his first choice of director,
John Huston, refused to kowtow to his essential demands. Even before that,
Selznick had undergone the humiliating experience of having to beg for
sponsorship to the majors. In his prime, Selznick would have merely snapped his
fingers at MGM or simply taken the reins at Selznick International; finding
financing from partner, Jock Whitney to write the necessary checks. But MGM,
while generally interested in the property after losing the bidding war to make
Tolstoy’s War and Peace, was in the
death throes of yet another corporate management shake-up. Without L.B. Mayer
to point to as his arch nemesis, Loewe’s Incorporated President, Nicholas
Schenck quickly learned from his stockholders the real blame for Metro’s
dwindling cash flow now squarely rested at his shoulders. Depending on the
source consulted Schenck either ‘retired’
or was quietly asked to ‘resign’.
Either way, MGM’s interest to finance A
Farewell to Arms abruptly ended with his departure. Selznick then turned to
2oth Century-Fox, having already put their money behind Darryl F. Zanuck’s
indie-produced movie of Hemingway’s The
Sun Also Rises (1957). Only now it was John Huston wasting a good deal of
Selznick’s preliminary budget tinkering with Hecht’s script (it needed it);
also, with plans of doing ‘something else’ with what he had been offered. If Selznick’s zeal for A Farewell to Arms had waned, then his usual caustic nature to
stand his ground on matters of good taste did not. Firing off a lengthy memo to
Huston – essentially to force him off the project – Selznick went after Charles
Vidor to replace him. And although Vidor and Selznick worked well together back
in the day, their relationship on the set of A Farewell to Arms was acrimonious at best.
Determined to
add stature to his $4,353,000 opus magnum, Selznick insisted on shooting the
picture half-way around the world on location in the Italian Alps, Venzone in
the Province of Udine in the region of Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Lazio, and
Cinecitta Studios in Rome. Yet, for all his endeavors to achieve verisimilitude
on the screen, Selznick would quickly discover not even all those dramatically
blood-stained, burning, muddy and snow-capped Alpine peaks could detour the viewer
from recognizing both the script and central performers were trivial, apathetic
and mortifying; not only to the reputation of the novel, but their own, as
purveyors of better art seen to its best advantage elsewhere. Worse, the
picture relied almost surreptitiously on the audience having already read the
novel to help fill in the blanks between infrequent fades to black – the
emotional significance of whole chapters in Hemingway’s novel left open-ended
on the screen or worse, substituted with scenes of less dramatic ballast and
intensity to help trundle out, but then betray their memories held dear, though
never to materialize on the screen.
After its faux
GWTW main titles, set to Mario
Nascimbene’s rather sour and nondescript underscore, A Farewell To Arms settles on the return of Lt. Frederick Henry
(Rock Hudson); an American officer serving in the ambulance corps for the
Italian Army during World War I. Henry’s a scamp, attested by the lusty glances
he gets from prostitutes leaning out of the upstairs windows above the local
saloon; also, from the adoring, almost homoerotic gazes he receives from,
Major
Alessandro Rinaldi (Vittorio De Sica) who openly wishes to possess, or at least
feed off of the stamina, looks and youth Henry currently possesses in spades.
Nevertheless, Rinaldi is a pretty wily bastard in his own right with a string
of conquests as long as his…well…we’ll leave that to providence, and, much to
the amused chagrin of Father Galli (Alberto Sordi). Rinaldi shares his latest
discovery with Henry, a gorgeous Brit-born nurse, Catherine Barkley, newly
arrived to commit herself to the cause. The men make their short sojourn to the
hospital where Henry becomes almost immediately smitten with Catherine. She is
seemingly less than interested in him; exalting the memory of her dead fiancée
and later, throwing a rather awkward temper tantrum, slapping Henry’s face as
he makes his advances, apologizing profusely for the insult, then suffering a
minor breakdown during an impromptu thunderstorm. She hates the rain – go
figure. Henry is called to drive his ambulance up a perilous winding road along
the Alpine ledges to tend to the wounded and dying fighting not so very far
off. Instead, the enemy launches a counteroffensive; one of the mortar shells
landing nearby and severely wounding him in the legs. Henry is rushed into
surgery and later tended to by Catherine who finds him suddenly more attractive
than irksome. A clandestine romance begins to blossom, right under the nose of
hospital matron, Miss Van Campen (Mercedes McCambridge) and ably abetted by
fellow nurse, Helen Ferguson (Elaine Stritch in a sort of Eve Arden-styled ‘His
Girl Friday’ part – tucking bottles of wine into her uniform and
playing devil’s advocate with the stringent Van Campen).
Despite the
rules, Henry and Catherine are clandestinely wed, though not before Van Campen
catches the pair in their duplicity. Vindictively, she signs papers attesting
to Henry’s full recovery. And while he is not exactly invalided, Henry is far
from ready for active duty. Nevertheless, he is forced to the front; Van Campen
seeing to it Catherine is ousted from her position at the hospital. Catherine
reveals to Ferguson she is carrying Henry’s child. Living obscurely, Catherine
waits for news of her beloved’s survival – or otherwise. Alas, in her fragile
condition and during their separation, Catherine comes to believe Henry might
have taken the easy road and abandoned her for good. Following the hellish and
demoralizing Battle of Caporetto, Henry and Rinaldi do all they can to assist
the fleeing locals. The exodus is fraught with casualties; people beaten into
the mud and to the point of extinction. At some point, Rinaldi begins to lose
his grip on reality, chanting vial retribution for those allowing these
brutalities to go on. His dissention is duly noted, and, before long, Rinaldi
is ushered into a military-styled tribunal and court-martialed without even
being allowed to plead his case. Appalled by Rinaldi’s execution by firing
squad, Henry attempts to broker favor with the tribunal. He too is sentenced to
death, but manages instead to create a disturbance and flee to relative safety
by jumping off a bridge into the frigid muddy waters far below. Wanted for
desertion, Henry manages to reunite with Ferguson as the hospital is preparing
its own evacuation at the train depot. Alas, Van Campen’s hatred for him has
not mellowed with time. She attempts to call Henry out as a deserter. Once
again, Henry manages a narrow escape, eventually resurfacing at Catherine’s
apartment door.
Ecstatic to
find him alive, Catherine bundles her beloved off to a lakeside resort bordering
Italy and Switzerland. Yet, even here the authorities will likely search for
him. And so, Catherine persuades Henry to steal a rowboat under the cover of
night. Through a hellish rainstorm and near capture by the Italian boat patrol,
Catherine and Henry manage their daring escape, resurfacing at a tiny resort on
the Swiss side. Their fears of being sent back are allayed when the local
constabulary, upon examining their passports, welcomes them as ‘tourists’
rather than refugees. Catherine’s pregnancy progresses. For a brief wrinkle in
time, the couple’s bliss seems assured. She gives birth to what appears to be a
healthy baby boy under Dr. Emerich’s (Oskar Homolka) kindly care. But only
several hours later, Henry learns his newborn son has died and Catherine too
now hovers on the edge of death. Powerless to prevent the inevitable, Henry
remains at his wife’s bedside until she expires; departing the room with a look
far more shell-shocked than anything ever experienced in war. As he wanders
aimlessly through the empty streets at dusk, Henry recalls the few fleeting
moments of happiness they shared together. Such is life, the dream remembered,
and the promises of more never to be.
A Farewell to Arms really ought to be considered
more of a belated ‘farewell to David O. Selznick’
or rather, a bittersweet goodbye to that mantel of quality for which the
producer, both at Selznick International, and the various other studios where
he created movie magic, was best known.
Ironically, there is nothing in A
Farewell to Arms to even hint at Selznick’s fastidiousness, nor even his
verve to succeed and will from the ruins another golden epoch. Selznick sold
distribution of the picture for a cool million to Fox. But he was greatly
depressed by its underwhelming performance at the box office. It made money –
just barely. With the loss of his mother in 1959, Selznick turned his
attentions toward adapting F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Tender is the Night for Fox. He owed them another picture. But the
project stymied after Cary Grant delayed, then reneged on accepting the role of
Dick Diver. Meanwhile, Spyros P. Skouras, then in charge, further informed
Selznick that due to his most recent snafu with British exhibitors, he would
not be allowed to progress any further beyond preparing the screenplay for Tender is the Night; a deal ironed out
for his services thus far and the loan out of Jennifer Jones to costar. Reluctantly,
Selznick agreed. But he never entirely forgave Skouras this intervention. In
the fall, Selznick elected to attend a special ‘anniversary’ screening of GWTW in Atlanta, along with Vivien
Leigh and Olivia de Havilland. Their joyful reunion was marginally offset by Clark
Gable’s untimely death. But Selznick was greatly invigorated by the prestige of
the evening and resounding applause and notoriety that followed the screening –
a sort of vindication his particular brand of entertainment had not lost its
ability to remain perennially fresh and relevant with audiences.
But for
Selznick, the worst was yet to follow: Tender
is the Night proving a disaster. And although Richard Zanuck pledged to
make a sequel to Gone With The Wind,
affording Selznick his usual level of involvement, it was by now clear to
Selznick the time had come for him to face semiretirement with dignity. The
mood in Hollywood had remained optimistic during the early sixties; the decided
chill brought on by Fox’s titanic $40 million dollar investment in Cleopatra (1962) yet to attain its full
fiscal fallout. And Selznick, having grown exceptionally weary of the industry
he neither toiled in successfully or even, for that matter, was entirely
certain he understood anymore, reluctantly sold off the last of his controlling
interests in Gone With The Wind to
MGM; the studio wasting no time to reformat the picture for a brand new
‘widescreen’ revival. On the surface, Selznick and Jones portrayed a couple at
leisure and at peace. But behind closed doors they were fast becoming broke;
job offers for the actress practically nonexistent and Selznick already having
burned through most of the moneys paid to him for GWTW’s licensing. On June 22, 1965, Selznick, greatly buoyed by the
success of Jacques Demy’s The Umbrellas
of Cherbourg (a moment to vindicate his own ambitions to make yet another frothy/glossy
entertainment he loved best) began talks with Henry Luce in New York regarding
‘possible ventures’. It was too little too late; Selznick, suddenly departing
from their discussion, complaining of chest pains and rushed to Cedars of Sinai
Hospital where he died at 2:30pm. He was only 65 years old.
In the years
since Selznick’s passing many an entrepreneurial spirit has come and gone
through the Hollywood gristmill; some sporting the same temperament and level
of ambition as a David O. Selznick; others, arguably, an analogous parallel of
his genius – though never both qualities embodied in one man simultaneously. It
ought to be pointed out it takes both virtuosity and showmanship to produce a
classic. Selznick, often bashed today as a meddlesome interloper who
‘prevented’ talents superior to his own – like Alfred Hitchcock - from
triumphing in their own particular soil of good taste, is as absurd a notion as
to suggest Gone With The Wind could
have been made at MGM or anywhere else without Selznick’s daily – sometimes
hourly – investment of tireless energies to rein in the creatives, keep them
motivated, but also keeping them honest and focused. Lest we remember, MGM
tried to resurrect the legacy of a GWTW
with Raintree County – a colossal
misfire; ditto for television’s ambitious stab at a sequel to GWTW with Scarlett – the 1994 miniseries
attempting to pick up where ‘the wind’
had left off. And Selznick, who had toiled longer, harder and with far more
reasons to fail than succeed on ‘Wind’ only to prove his most ardent
detractors wrong in the months following its triumphant Atlanta premiere and
Oscar-sweeping success, had taken his message to the streets – or rather, the
University of Rochester in 1940 where he spoke not only about the intangibles
faced within the film-making process, but also his innate love for it, the
passion to see good films being made in Hollywood and as positively received
and revered around the world.
A Farewell to Arms is undeniably not among this
cherished back catalog of Selznick memories – nor does it deserve to be. What a downer! What a shame! But
its lackluster appreciation should never negate the high praise, and even
loftier hopes for the future Selznick imparted to the graduating class on that sweltering
hot afternoon: “To you, who feel the
burning urge to influence the modes and manners, the social and political
ideologies of the future through the medium of the motion picture…I say, Here
is a challenge. Here is a frontier that is and always will be crying for the
courage and the energy and the genius of American youth. Here is the Southwest
Passage to fame and fortune and influence. Here is the El Dorado of the heart,
the soul and the mind.” And so it has remained, of the millions of miles in
celluloid exposed, a handful of stories, men and women, destined to be
remembered for as long as youth endures and people are left to remember them. I
miss the likes of a David O. Selznick - terribly so. For there has been
virtually nothing like the man on Hollywood’s horizon since. Perhaps, his like
shall not pass this way again. More’s the pity then, as now, for the days ahead
and we who continue to dream in, of, about, and, for the Hollywood that was,
never was, or rather, might possibly come around, if only the dreams we dared
to dream really did come true.
A Farewell to Arms has supposedly received a new 4K
restoration. At least, that is what Kino Lorber’s back packaging of the newly
released Blu-ray suggests. But the results are regrettably far from perfect.
For starters, I do not see signs that any sort of substantial color correction
has been applied to nurse these elements back from a fairly deplorable state of
vinegar syndrome. Flesh tones are the most egregious transgressors throughout;
rarely looking anything close to natural; at times, adopting a garish orange palette while at others looking fairly jaundice. A Farewell to Arms was shot in Cinemascope with color by DeLuxe.
Even so, it should not look half this anemic, especially since the picture has
rarely been taken out of mothballs since its theatrical release. Yet, overall,
the image suffers from a muddy palette of colors; reds appearing more
brownish/orange than true red, grey leaning to a dull grey/beige, and blues
often more grey or even blackish than blue. Every so often, color snaps
together for a brief moment or two. We get some suggestion of what the Alpine
landscape must have looked like, with bold green foliage on display. But even
the white snow-capped mountains appear dull and dirty in this transfer. The hot
searing flames as Caporetto is burned to the ground look more flat
pinkish/orange than yellow and bright. Curiously, film grain appears to have
been slightly homogenized. Contrast is weaker than anticipated. The image is
free of age-related artifacts, but at this point who really cares? What is on
display here is flat, pasty and unappealing from start to finish, the candlelit
subtleties in Oswald Morris, Piero Portalupi and James Wong Howe’s cobbled
together cinematography wholly obscured by this uninspiring visual
presentation. The 2.0 DTS audio is satisfactory, if never remarkable; dialogue
front and center and Mario Nascimbene’s orchestrations achieving considerable
bombast and, occasionally, impressive clarity. There are no extra features
included. Bottom line: pass and be very glad that you did!
FILM RATING (out of 5 – 5 being the best)
1
VIDEO/AUDIO
2.5
EXTRAS
0
Comments