TRUMBO: Blu-ray (Universal/Bleecker Street 2015) Universal Home Video
Hollywood
loves telling stories about itself. But part of the problem with Jay Roach’s Trumbo (2015) is it is so slavishly
devoted to the exoneration of its subject, screenwriter, Dalton Trumbo (Bryan
Cranston) it cannot see the proverbial forest for the trees; namely, Trumbo’s
innocence. John McNamara’s screenplay quickly devolves into a series of vignettes
loosely strung together; a rather turgid textbook of the blacklist with myopic
focus on one of the infamous ‘Hollywood Ten’ at the expense of minimizing the
other nine lives directly impacted. I would like to impart on contemporary film
makers that there is a fine line of distinction between telling a good story,
telling a factual story, and telling one for which the impressions of life
would best be served by forgoing a modicum of truth in service to ‘artistic
license’. Trumbo is not a biopic of
the man; McNamara’s script cobbling together the incidents of Trumbo’s flawed defiance
during the Red Menace with a badly fumbled documentarian’s ambition, leaving
Cranston’s perpetually whiskey-soaked and Benzadrine-popping curmudgeon
preciously too little room to maneuver and/or deviate from espousing keynotes
in the Communist manifesto or spitting pithy platitudes to unsettle members of
Congress while ruffling the plucked plumage of arch nemesis, nationally
syndicated gossip columnist, Hedda Hopper (Helen Mirren). Alas, this is a narrative
misfire from which this movie never entirely recovers.
The other eminent
weakness here is casting. Apart from Cranston’s rather histrionic central
performance, at times veering dangerously close to becoming the clichéd clown
of the piece - all mismanaged and badly bungled Marxist buffoonery – the rest
of the stars who populate this rigidly structured antiquity are little more
than set dressing. Looking for scapegoats and a clear-cut villain on which to
hang its liberalized cause cĂ©lèbre, Helen Mirren’s maven of mirth hurriedly
federalizes into a doggedly toxic gargoyle; drunk on the measly mirage of her
veiled threats, oozing from the ink of her poisoned pen; enough to accost MGM’s
raja, L.B. Mayer (Richard Portnow) as a skirt-chasing ‘kike’. While no one can
know for certain; this probably never happened, as Mayer was still a good three
years away from being ousted from his untouchable seat of authority and could
have – and distinctly would have –
squashed the venomous Hopper like a bug. Hedda had guts. But Mayer had
power…real power. And Hopper’s deliriously ribald bitch is the best of the lot
in Trumbo. The other performances,
from David James Elliott’s glowering and ultra-wooden caricature of John Wayne
to Dean O'Gorman’s prepubescent and edgy, Kirk Douglas, are so uniformly bad, they
bear mentioning only as examples of how ridiculous this sort of retrofitted
‘history’ can get when time and attention are not closely paid to truly
resurrecting people as well as the period. There is a fine line between
emulation and parody, particularly when embarking on the fool’s errand to
recreate iconic legends of the silver screen, filling their immortal shoes with
actors who neither tower in their own stature – as any actor of merit must –
nor remotely resemble – physically, or in manner and deportment – the
larger-than-life figures they are attempting to embody and rival.
In the back
catalog of unique talents, vying for acceptability as their alter egos, I am
immediately reminded of Sissy Spacek’s monumental incarnation of first lady of
country music, Loretta Lynn in Coal
Miner’s Daughter (1980); kudos to Beverly D'Angelo’s haunting portrait as
Patsy Cline from this same movie; or Paul Sorvino’s uncanny channeling of Henry
Kissinger for Oliver Stone’s Nixon (1995)
and Albert Finney’s bone-chilling renaissance to Winston Churchill in 2002’s The Gathering Storm. In the shadow of
these memorable homages is Michael Stuhlbarg’s Edward G. Robinson in Trumbo; a grotesquely sentimental, yet
queerly unsympathetic, and utterly painful attempt by a minor talent to ape a
legendary one. Has Struhlbarg ever seen Edward G. Robinson: not just at the
movies but giving an interview?!? At least if he had physicality down pat, as
say Robert Sacchi in The Man with
Bogart’s Face (1980), then suspended plausibility could be applied in moments
where bad acting creates an obvious disconnect between truth and
verisimilitude. Struhlbarg is hardly alone in his flawed gentrification of a
big name star. We have already mentioned David James Elliott and Dean O’Gorman
as a pair of unprepossessing fakes; the former, in flashes, coming close to
sounding like ‘Duke’ Wayne if still looking more like a robotic ‘Jag’ knock-off with too much starch in
his britches; and O’Gorman, favoring the physical shading and limited acting
range of a William Baldwin, wholly lacks the versatility and chutzpah of a
dynamo like Kirk Douglas. Others in this fractured mélange do not fare any
better. John Goodman’s Frank King has the physical girth, but lacks the bearing
of King’s own summer stock version of the indie showman a la Michael Todd. Christian
Berkel does a wicked lampoon of the oft’ maniacal, brilliant bastard/director,
Otto Preminger (oh well, at least he has the accent). Rick Kelly is a
ridiculous falsification of J.F.K. whom I kept expecting to suddenly depart
from his cameo and shout out, ‘Vote
Quimby’ (to any fan of The Simpsons
this reference will immediately ring true).
Let us get
honest here for just a moment. Thanks mostly to Production Designer, Mark
Ricker and Costume Designer, Daniel Orlandi, Trumbo has the visual patina of late forties/early fifties Hollywood
to recommend it. But this is not enough of an incentive to see the picture, nor
is stock-piling its’ roster with middling actors who cannot hold a candle to
their incandescent counterparts. Aside: I noticed no one deigned attempt a carbon
copy of Audrey Hepburn, as example (how could anyone even begin to suggest Hepburn’s luminosity anyway?) – mercifully
using inserts from the real ‘reel’
classic, Roman Holiday (1953) to fill
in this gap. And wasting credible ones like Diane Lane, in a part any fledgling
starlet could have (and should have) performed, with little more training than
a horn-tooting seal at SeaWorld, is not the route to go either. So, if
Hollywood today cannot even recapture the inviolate grandeur of its outwardly
halcyon and rose-colored past – all studio-sanctioned banana oil, slickly
packaged in highly controlled junkets and heavily concocted glam-bam magazine
puff pieces, then perhaps it is high time the industry stopped trying to
rewrite itself as anything more disingenuous.
John
McNamara’s screenplay goes to great pains to canonize Dalton Trumbo as the
patron saint of all minorities in danger of being swallowed whole by that
ultra-conservatism that bred fear, loathing and panic during the Truman/McCarthy
era; foregoing – or rather – minimizing the fact Trumbo was a fairly outspoken
card-carrying member of the Communist Party; a real disconnect between the
perceived Commi, threatening to topple American idealism with the stroke of his
pen, and Trumbo’s own seemingly autonomous position within the corporate
structure of Hollywood itself, as the highest paid personage in his chosen
profession, equally presumed too big to fail, whatever his convictions. The
real Dalton Trumbo would likely have approved of such exoneration, though
arguably, not of the results achieved herein on his behalf. For although the movie resonates with
Trumbo’s sharp-tongued introspection, the character, as conceived and
amalgamated by McNamara and actor, Bryan Cranston, begins to fall apart under
the strain of such platitudes and cheaply sentimentalized familial dreck –
embodied in several key scenes scattered throughout the latter half of the
picture, prominently featuring Elle Fanning as the writer’s daughter, Nikola
who has her own mind, social causes to champion, and, increasingly resents her
father’s myopic view of sly revenge that supersedes the family’s need to live
from under such microscopic dissections. Yet, even as dime store melodrama, Trumbo disappoints; the snippets and
sound bites stitched together in all too brief wan ghost-flowered impressions
of the man, his purpose and his plight.
Trumbo’s
elitism is at odds with his communist propaganda; McNamara’s screenplay
attempting rather unsuccessfully a buddy/buddy relationship between Trumbo and
fellow chain-smoking/cancer-ridden writer, Arlen Hird (Louis C.K.). Hird
doesn’t much approve of Trumbo living high on the hog on a serenely pastoral
farm. After all, how does this bode with Marx’s theorized collective sacrifice?
Well, okay – it doesn’t. Trumbo as hypocrite? Not, entirely. Lest we forget
Marx’s utopian ‘cure all’ for capitalism was not implemented as written and certainly
never was to see the true light of day in Soviet Russia. Like far too many
movies being made with a disingenuous political slant in America these days,
America itself – or, at the very least, its’ government – and definitely its heroes of yore – are being
viewed through the lens of even more insidiously misguided uber-liberal/communist
empathies as the worst kind of enemy; Robert Taylor’s infamous HUAC testimony, “I think they should all be sent back to
Russia” inserted yet again to prove a point – both of arrogance and
nationalized propensity to infer ‘patriotism’ as the real boogie man. There are
distinct cracks in this Liberty Bell, however, Trumbo, attempting to have his
point of view heard – if not respected – confronting America’s Teflon-coated
iconography of itself, then best embodied in the grandee John Wayne. Trumbo’s
point is, in fact, exceptionally well placed, suggesting to Wayne, “If you’re going to talk about World War II
as if you personally won it, let’s be clear where you were stationed - on a
film set, shooting blanks, wearing makeup, and if you're going to hit me, I'd
like to take off my glasses.”
Poor Trumbo.
He has made rather a bad enemy of the vigorous maverick of the western/war
movie; also, the treacherous Hedda Hopper who has no compunction about
blackmailing MGM’s L.B. Mayer into letting Trumbo out of his contract or else
made to endure the onslaught of idiotic accusations and innuendoes surely to
tarnish, if not entirely dismantle, his empire.
Trumbo is one of ten
screenwriters singled out and subpoenaed to testify before the House Committee
on Un-American Activities (HUAC), presided over with an iron fist by former New
Jersey stockbroker cum politico, J. Parnell Thomas (James DuMont), who later
turns out to be guilty of corruption; the proverbial ‘pot’ calling ‘the kettle’
black. Trumbo encourages a small contingent of his contemporaries, including
Hird to stand their ground. While they might be held in contempt of Congress
for refusing to testify and ‘name names’, Trumbo is comforted in the knowledge
the liberal majority on the Supreme Court, who abhor HUAC on principle alone,
will never allow any such conviction to stand.
In the
meantime, close personal friend, Edward G. Robinson, an ardent supporter of their
cause, sells his Van Gogh Portrait of Père Tanguy to raise money for the
Hollywood Ten’s legal defense fund. However, standing in the shadow of some
very unsettling times; the conviction of the Rosenbergs, the ascendency of
Joseph McCarthy, and, the Communist witch hunts cutting a swath through
Hollywood’s artistic community with a scorched earth policy, Robinson breaks
under pressure and the very real threat he will never work again. Given the
choice, he fingers Trumbo as a communist. The wounds from this betrayal will
never heal. But Trumbo has equally underestimated the strength of his own
cunning; also what the unexpected death of Justice Wiley Rutledge will do to
his chances of getting a fair appeal. Instead, Trumbo and his brethren go to
prison; eleven months all told in Texarkana; Trumbo striking a rather tenuous
partnership with convicted murderer, Virgil Brooks (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje)
to ease his daily duties.
Newly
released, Trumbo reasons time served behind bars equates to time served in the
court of public opinion. Alas, old friends – or perhaps, merely fair-weather
ones – like producer, Buddy Ross (Roger Bart) have turned their backs on him,
seemingly for good; forcing Trumbo to sell his farm and move into a modest but
comfortable bungalow in town. Even in the heart of suburbia he is scrutinized,
now by a bigoted neighbor who leaves dead birds and debris in his backyard pool
and spray paints ominous threats on his fence. Blacklisted and desperate to
work, Trumbo writes Roman Holiday
for Paramount, allowing good friend, Ian McLellan Hunter (Alan Tudyk) to take
screen credit; Trumbo generously agreeing to split the money. The irony? The
screenplay is honored with an Academy Award. But this is gossipy Hollywood at
its zenith, and rumblings immediately stir that Hunter is a front for Trumbo;
Hedda, quite unable to conclusively unearth the truth from Trumbo’s own
whiskey-stained lips but thereafter, making it her passion to ruin him
completely. Now, Trumbo goes to work for the King Brothers, Frank and Hymie
(Stephen Root) – a C-grade production company, pumping out pulpy serials for
the matinee crowd. Trumbo wisely deduces the King Corp. could do with a bit of
classing up. And Frank, who openly admits he is only in the picture-making biz
for ‘the pussy and the money instantly
recognizes he can get quality prose dirt cheap to enhance his credibility in
the business.
On the home
front, the strain of churning out script after script begins to involve
Trumbo’s marriage. His wife, Cleo and their teenage children all assume roles
as his secret couriers, Trumbo demanding they put all of their lives on hold to
perpetuate the ruse. Eldest daughter, Nikola accepts her part in this magic
lantern farce, but steadily comes to resent her father’s myopic distortion of
their home life. They’re a family, damn it. Not his employees. Trumbo has
greater luck getting his alienated brethren in Hollywood to write even more
scripts for the King Brothers; their finest achievement yet, The Brave One (1956) – a powerful tale
of an unlikely friendship between a Spanish boy and a bull. The screenplay,
very personal to Trumbo, wins him his second uncredited Academy Award –
accepted on his behave by the mysterious Robert Rich – a pseudonym for a fellow
who actually does not exist. Hedda is incensed. But Frank King will not be
threatened into firing his most profitable writer. Amidst this hullabaloo,
Arlen Hird dies of lung cancer, hopelessly destitute and leaving behind two
young sons whom Trumbo refuses to take money from after their father’s
wake.
Suspicion
mounts and rumors swirl that Trumbo has become a one-man ghostwriting phenomena.
Recognizing the transparency of his talent on the screen, actor, Kirk Douglas recruits
Trumbo to adapt Spartacus (1960).
For decades, the real Kirk Douglas has maintained he was responsible for defying the blacklist by demanding Dalton
Trumbo’s name be given its proper screen credit for this movie. But Trumbo – the movie – would have us
believe Douglas intended Trumbo to remain anonymous as before; pressured even
by Hedda to ensure this would happen, yet as determined to outfox the industry
after director, Otto Preminger, who hires Trumbo to translate Leon Uris’
sprawling novel into a screenplay for his movie version of Exodus. Playing both sides against the middle, Trumbo tells
Preminger he is too busy writing Spartacus
to partake – implying it will be the first movie to bear his name in the
credits. Preminger asserts he would be willing to give Trumbo a screen credit
too if he accepts the new assignment; Trumbo returning to Douglas with this
‘news’ and thus forcing Douglas to beat out Preminger’s offer by only a few
months between the two theatrical releases that will both carry Trumbo’s name. With President Kennedy’s endorsement during a
private screening, the blacklist is irreversibly shattered. Trumbo concludes with a foreshadowing
of things to come. Hedda Hopper’s days in Hollywood are at an end. We flash ahead to 1970, Trumbo accepting accolades
long overdue and speaking out against the victimization of the blacklist: a
terrible chapter in American politics that ruined far too many lives, distorted
reality and decimated a good many Hollywood careers.
This penultimate
speech ought to have been a stirring, if sad-eyed invective; a dramatic
summarization of the more informal torment inflicted upon creatives in the
entertainment industry. After all, the blacklist was ultimately a discredit and
a hypocrisy having very little to do about ending communism in the United
States. Instead, Bryan Cranston’s inflections prove polemic than anemic in
reassessing the weighty fallout that actually occurred. In Dalton Trumbo’s
case, turning the camera lens on this historically ugly chapter in American
politics as one man’s plight against its machinery has not humanized the saga
at all, so much as transformed it into a scant and terribly unprepossessing
TripTik through history, better evolved in author, Bruce Cook’s biography on
which this movie is based. Cranston’s portrait of Trumbo is subtly nuanced, and
arguably, the best thing in it. Yet, it is hampered by John McNamara’s
interpretation of the source material; also, by director, Jay Roach’s
inexcusable boredom, his complete inability to sustain any scene beyond a few
loaded barbs, given short shrift before cutting away to the next scene and then
the next, and the next, with a complete lack of finesse for building dramatic irony
or even mounting tension. Either might have sustained and nourished his rather
pedestrian sense of cinema storytelling. But at 124 minutes, Trumbo drags. To be sure, there is a more compelling narrative yet
to be told within. But it is to be discovered elsewhere. I cannot stress enough
my dismay with a good many contemporary film makers endeavoring to paint their
own impressions over the past in broad brush strokes only to succumb to the
stringency of remaining ‘true’ to history itself and thereafter sacrificing
virtually every last vestige of artistic license, while introducing –
intentionally or not – new biases into the mix. Tell the truth or tell us a
fairy tale. But please – please – do not
bastardize the precepts of either in your feeble attempts to homogenize these
two irreconcilable worlds as one.
If remaining true to history is, in fact, Roach’s
mantra, he would have done better to make a documentary about Trumbo rather
than a reenactment. I have stated as much before, but reality is oft’
depressing and unprepossessing. Movies are, as some brilliant minds have long
since pointed out, life - with all the
dull parts cut out. Trumbo is
life with a lot of the dull parts left in! It misses the mark by not being able
to capture the luridness, immediacy and danger of a very real threat to
American civil liberties that was, at least for a time, perpetuated by its own
government in the name of democracy. That message is lost, buried, bungled or
set aside in Trumbo; presumably to
give us a more intimate portrait of one man’s blow back. It is therefore rather
disheartening to discover the characters inhabiting Dalton Trumbo’s private
life as cardboard cutouts; soulless stick-figures with little distinction or
opportunity to shine and virtually nothing to make the audience care one way or
the other about them. It doesn’t work, at all and Trumbo – the movie – falls flat: as a melodrama, an entertainment
or even an overly simplified history lesson.
Trumbo on Blu-ray isn’t all that exciting either. Universal’s
effort is competently rendered, but not much pop or punch to the image. Trumbo’s
1080p transfer is solid, if unremarkable. It also occasionally lacks crispness;
the fine details in Jim Denault’s cinematography getting lost under a thin
murky haze. Colors can be robust; Helen Mirren’s wildly amusing assortment of
bonnets and chapeaus exhibiting some frothy forties and early fifties
Kodachrome-esque tones. Skin tones adopt a ruddy California sun-kissed tint and
contrast, overall, is good. Film grain also looks quite natural. The 5.1 DTS
audio is adequate with crisp dialogue and a few nicely placed sound effects and
music cues to sustain. Extras are limited to a junket produced to promote the
movie; also, an original theatrical trailer covering a lot of the same ground.
Honestly, I could have watched the trailer and been thoroughly satisfied.
Bottom line: pass and be glad that you did.
FILM RATING (out of 5 – 5 being the best)
2
VIDEO/AUDIO
3.5
EXTRAS
1
Comments