PORTRAIT IN BLACK: Blu-ray (Universal-International, 1960) Kino Lorber
A reunion pic
for stars, Lana Turner, Lloyd Nolen, John Saxon and Sandra Dee, director, Michael
Gordon’s Portrait in Black (1960) is
a syrupy neo-noir with some good solid performances by the aforementioned
roster, ably assisted by co-stars, Anthony Quinn, Richard Basehart and Anna May
Wong – in her final screen appearance. Turner and Nolen had appeared together
in 1957’s Peyton Place – ostensibly,
the picture that kicked off Turner’s lucrative spate of memorable sixties
tear-jerkers, although herein, they are at each other’s throats as marrieds, Sheila
and Matt Cabot. He’s an invalided shipping magnet, racked with paralytic back
pain, and she is the maven of the maison, carrying on a clandestine affair with
Quinn’s Dr. David Rivera. As for Dee and Saxon; they had co-starred twice
before, in 1958’s overwrought and melodramatic, The Restless Years, and, Vincente Minnelli’s champagne cocktail of
a rom/com - The Reluctant Debutante.
Herein, Dee is Matt’s daughter from a
previous marriage, Cathy and Saxon is her near-penniless, but ever-devoted
lover, Blake Richards. Into this mix, we also find Ray Walston, as Cobb, the
family’s wily chauffeur with a gambling addiction, Wong’s Tawny – the mysterious
sort, as the Cabot’s Asian major-domo, and, Virginia Grey, as Matt’s private
secretary with a secret to keep, Miss Lee.
Portrait in Black is actually based on a 1947
Broadway play, slated for film production as early as 1952; then, with Joan
Crawford and James Mason to star. Curiously, this version never materialized,
despite considerable interest in the property from the studio, its proposed
co-stars, and, a highly successful radio adaptation that same year, featuring Barbara
Stanwyck and Richard Widmark. For
whatever reasons, plans to transform Portrait
in Black into a major motion picture repeatedly stalled. In the interim, Crawford’s
reputation slipped at the box office and Mason moved on to do other stellar
work elsewhere. So, by 1959, neither were up for consideration when Portrait in Black was resurrected, then
green-lit at Universal-International. The
play’s relatively short run of 65 performances, likely was a disappointment to its
co-authors, Ivan Goff and Ben Roberts, who had toiled on its particulars for 13
months. The reprieve came when Uni bought the rights for a cool $100,000
against a sliding percentage of the gross. But this agreement also came with a
clause that was even more beneficial to Goff and Roberts. If the picture was
not made by 1950, all rights would revert back to them. But they could still
keep the $100,000!
As Brit-born, Diana
Wynyard had appeared in Portrait in
Black’s London production, she was, for a time, strongly considered as the
new front-runner to helm the movie, with hubby/director, Carol Reed to direct it.
Alas, Reed disagreed with the studio on how best to adapt the stagecraft, as
did Michael Gordon – Reed’s replacement. By 1948, Goff’s patience had worn thin. So, he
offered to buy back the property. Alas, Universal then demanded a steep $316,000
– too rich for Goff’s blood. However, in the end, Goff had his way. The years
passed uneventfully. With the expiration date passed, in 1950, Goff reclaimed ownership
of the play without having to pay out a dime. At this juncture, Goff and
Roberts appealed to Gordon again, to help co-finance an indie production, still
hoping to star Crawford. Again, nothing came of this. So, when Universal
beckoned a second time in 1959, Goff and Roberts happily signed on yet again to
revamp and update their original. Rather bizarrely, the writers chose to rechristen
all of their characters’ names for the movie version. Not a one is a hold-over
from the play. They also opened up the structure of its ‘drawing room’ histrionics
to take full advantage of the San Franciscan Bay area locations, and, heavily
rewrote the picture’s ending.
Given its
treacle-rich subject matter, stewed in illicit sex and diabolical passion,
Universal handed over the reins to producer, Ross Hunter, whose métier was the
big screen soap opera. Under Hunter’s tutelage, Gordon returned to the director’s
chair, with Frank Skinner providing the melodramatic underscore, and cinematographer,
Russell MĂ©tier, shooting everything in Pathe color with an uber-glamorous
strain to highly flatter the picture’s new leading lady, Lana Turner.
Stunningly adorned in costumes by Jean Louis, and reportedly wearing nearly $2
million in rented jewels, Turner’s Sheila is a very classy clothes horse,
sashaying about the scenery in haute couture that is as impossibly sumptuous as
it is absurd, and, with not a flaxen hair out of place. She is gorgeous. The
problem: Turner, for all her enduring popularity as a glamour girl, is an
ill-fit for the part of the victimized housewife, who turns sexual frustration
into a frothy passion for the ‘good doctor’ administering pain killer
injections to her crippled, but still ruthless and power-hungry husband. If,
what one good woman could do for any man was to exalt his prospects beyond even
his own wildest ambitions, then the viperous sin with which Sheila envelopes
Dr. Rivera leads to murder and utterly swamps his physician’s ethics, ultimately
to destroy the one man that, arguably, Sheila has always loved. Turner’s take
on Sheila Cabot is a bit perplexing. Indeed, one finds a modicum of empathy for
the character in the early scenes when, resplendently bedecked in a head turban and furs, she
is rather cruelly admonished by her pouty, if steely-eyed stepdaughter, merely
for desiring to leave the house ‘for a
breath of fresh air’ after three whole days of vigilance at her husband’s
bedside.
Quickly,
however, our sympathies sour as we discover Sheila is not going out to casually
shop the department stores, but rather, dodging her suspicious chauffeur, hails
a taxi to Dr. Rivera’s fashionable townhouse, to share in an ardent clinch. Rivera
explains that while Matt is ill, he
may linger indefinitely in pain and suffering, thus preventing them from
continuing their affair – presumably, already going on for some time before the
start of the picture. As the strain of this flagrante delicto, as well as the
thought of losing it, proves too much of a distraction for Rivera, he has
already practically agreed to take a new ‘research’ post at a hospital in Switzerland.
Sheila is, of course, the last to find out, and despondent by the thought of
losing her lover. So, the two conspire to bump Matt off and live happily ever
after. Actually, Rivera comes up with the plan; just a seemingly routine visit
for another injection, only this time, with a small bubble of air accidentally/on
purpose shot into Matt’s veins – enough to kill him, but still have the autopsy
declare it a death from ‘natural causes.’ Meanwhile, Matt’s business manager,
Howard Mason (the sadly underrated Richard Basehart) is against his boss’
decision to grant a lucrative shipping contract to a fledgling tug operation,
managed by Cathy’s boyfriend, Blake. However, this subplot is delayed for the
moment.
As, having successfully
dispatched with the husband, prematurely sent to his grave; the funeral over,
without a tear of sadness shed – although Gordon does stage everything on a
windswept and rainy grey afternoon (on an obvious indoor set), life for Sheila
and Rivera becomes sentimentally unbearable. She longs for his touch. But he
nervously resists, fearing everyone will see through their motives and thus
assume the worst. Meanwhile, Cobb is up to his ears to a bookie, encouraging
Sheila to advance his salary in order to cover his debts. She agrees to
consider the matter – but then, begins to receive cryptic notes ‘congratulating’
her on a successful murder. Concealing these from her young son, Peter (Dennis
Kohler), Sheila instead shows the hand-printed notes to Rivera. He grows weary
of their authenticity, but reasons whoever sent them likely has plans for
future blackmail. The thing to do is wait for the blackmailer to reveal
himself. Meanwhile, relieved of Matt’s influence, Howard cancels the contract
with Blake, citing his obvious ‘conflict of interest’ due to his romance with
Cathy. Blake threatens Howard in front of Miss Lee, who is forced to lie about
no such contract between Matt and Blake ever having existed in the first place.
However, later in the evening, Miss Lee arrives at a Chinese restaurant,
meeting up with Blake and Cathy to confess there was such a contract. As Howard has already destroyed the paperwork,
the best Miss Lee can offer Blake now are some age-old files that illustrate
how Howard destroyed Blake’s father nearly ten-years before; a demise for which
Blake has always held Matt accountable. Miss Lee also infers to Cathy she and Matt
were once lovers – even while Matt was married to Cathy’s mother. Thus, as his
intimate confidant, she knew everything about his business practices.
On the home
front, Howard makes his intentions known to Sheila. He has loved her from afar,
and rather insincerely proposes marriage to her, now that Matt has gone to his
earthly reward. Sheila coolly brushes him off. Only now, she plants seeds of
doubt in Rivera’s head. Perhaps, Howard wrote the blackmail notes. Rivera concurs.
Who else could have done it? So, after a longshoreman’s strike is declared,
Howard asks Sheila to come to his office to sign the necessary proxy to conduct
an arbitration meeting down at the docks. On Rivera’s authority, she resists,
instead asking Howard to stop by the mansion on his way to the meeting where
she will willingly sign off on the paperwork. It’s all just a ruse. Howard will
never make it to the meeting. Rivera plots to ambush him, staking out the mansion
and waiting for Howard’s car to pull up to a stoplight where he intends to
shoot Howard dead and make it look like an act of retaliation by the longshoremen.
As fate would have it, the light changes to green just in time, and Rivera
misses his mark. Howard rushes into the mansion, informing Sheila of his
near-death experience and instructing her to call the police. Instead, the
telephone rings. It is Rivera, telling Sheila to stall Howard. She feigns a
phone call from Cathy and tells Howard that Cathy is on her way to the station
to report the crime. Only now, the phone rings for a second time. Distracted,
Sheila lets Howard pick up the receiver and Cathy – unknowing of Sheila’s lie -
informs Howard she is having dinner with Blake at a nearby club.
Hanging up from
the call, Howard confronts Sheila’s treachery. Deducing she and Rivera have
conspired to kill him, as they likely murdered Matt, Howard’s attempt to beat
the truth out of Sheila is thwarted by Rivera, who pumps a bullet through Howard’s
heart on the living room floor. Peter is stirred from his slumber by the
gunshot, but quieted by Sheila, who convinces him the noise he heard was just a
dream. Now, Rivera, frantically explains to Sheila they must dispose of Howard’s
remains along a lonely stretch of coastal highway. One problem: Sheila does not
drive. Reluctantly, she somehow manages to tail Rivera in her car. Howard’s car
is driven by Rivera to an open cliff along the highway. Placing the vehicle in
neutral, Rivera nudges it over the edge with Howard’s body in the driver’s side.
Suddenly aware of what they have done, Sheila flies into hysterics. Returning
to the house with her sanity mostly restored, thanks to Rivera belting her
several times, Sheila is confronted by the police who have come to inform her
of Howard’s demise. She convincingly feigns shock and disbelief, but
deliberately lies about the timeline while being questioned in front of Cathy. As
Cathy knows when she last spoke to Howard, she grows ever-suspicious now of her
step-mother. Alas, not even she has fathomed Sheila’s lover is so close at
hand. Thus, Cathy confides her suspicions to Rivera. Her summation of the
events leading up to both her father and Howard’s death are spot on, causing
Rivera to do some quick back-peddling to abate her concerns. Rivera suggests
Cathy’s hypothesis about Sheila conspiring with another unknown man to off Howard
is highly implausible, since it would have taken two cars to commit the murder – one driven
by the murderer, the other by Sheila – who does not, and never has learned to
drive.
Confused, Cathy resurrects
her fears and concerns to Blake, who begins to believe she is hitting too close
to the truth. Now, Cathy questions Peter about ‘his dream’ and further learns
from Tawny that, on the night of Howard’s murder, Sheila gave the entire staff
the night off – presumably, to have no witnesses present in the house. Cathy
decides to confront Sheila. Meanwhile, at the mansion, Rivera learns from Sheila
she has received another cryptic message. Suspecting Cobb of the blackmail,
Rivera – who is becoming increasingly unhinged from his own crisis of conscience
for murdering Matt (haunted by echoed voices reciting the Hippocratic Oath) -
threatens Cobb’s life in Sheila’s presence. Actually, Cobb was planning on
hightailing it out of town to escape his bookie. He has no first-hand knowledge
of the notes. Cobb narrowly escapes Rivera murdering him. After Cobb has fled,
Sheila reveals to Rivera it was she who wrote the notes – a rather selfish means
to draw him nearer so they could renew their affair. Realizing he has killed
Howard for no apparent reason, Rivera begins to crumble. Arriving home, Cathy
is startled to discover Sheila in Rivera’s arms in the study. He tries to make
the girl see circumstances his way, but only succeeds in confirming her darkest
suspicions. It’s all true. Sheila and
Rivera killed Matt and Howard! Believing
he has no alternative, Rivera chases Cathy upstairs, intent on preventing her
from exposing them to the law. Cathy barricades herself in an upstairs bedroom,
climbing onto a narrow ledge beyond its window and screaming for Blake to turn
his car around and come to her rescue. Blake sees Cathy clinging to the ledge.
He also witnesses Rivera emerging from the window. In his attempt to push Cathy
to her death, Rivera instead loses his footing and falls several stories to his
own, breaking every bone in his body on the pavement far below as a tearful
Cathy and shell-shocked Sheila look on; the latter, doomed to face the painful
music she has wrought with so many perverted lies, deception and spite.
Portrait in Black is a mostly engrossing
entertainment. Lana Turner does tend to veer into the sort of prosaic piss-elegance
audiences had come to expect from her mid-career. She plays it right down the
middle and very safe with narrowly a moment in which to truly shine. The Razzie
for ‘most overwrought performance’
here must go to Tony Quinn’s self-imploding doctor, whose ubiquitous ethical decline
reaches Herculean stages of anguish. But is he a tragic figure, or a wicked assassin
by his own design? We are never entirely certain, and his end – falling from
the third-story ledge, with inappropriate fanfare, just seems like a quick n’
easy bypass to a predestined fate, far deserving of a more prolonged comeuppance.
Sandra Dee is particularly good as the devoted daughter who, in tandem exudes a
glacial coolness towards her stepmother, but stews in the embers of desire for
her devoted lover. The supporting cast all play their parts with finesse and
accomplishment. And Gordon’s direction never belabors any of the particulars in
the plot. Instead, he calculatingly
builds up to several bone-chilling vignettes of suspense, intermittently delayed
and/or interrupted by respites of tragedy and light speculation on where next
the plot is headed. In the end, Portrait
in Black, while a lot of fun to watch, is not exactly as memorable as some
of the other ‘women in distress’ soap operas to emerge from the period. Personally,
I would have relished the opportunity to see what Joan Crawford in her prime
might have done with this one. Ah yes, Crawford and Mason, indeed!
Portrait in Black arrives on Blu-ray via Kino Lorber’s
licensing agreement with Universal Home Video. Alas, Uni has provided Kino with
a sincerely flawed element, cribbing from digital files that are at least a
couple of decades old and in desperate need of remastering. The Pathe color is
pathetic; built-in flicker further marred by radical color density shifts (not
just from scene to scene, but shot to shot, with flesh tones either adopting a
flat, pasty pink or ruddy orange/brown complexion). On the brief – and very
sporadic – occasion when the color does settle down for just a shot or two, we
can see what Pathe color, in all its flawed glory, probably looked like in 1966
– hardly, up to Technicolor’s sterling standards, but passable nonetheless.
Vinegar syndrome and severe fading equally plague this transfer. Hues are a
muddy mess. Greens look brown, blacks look blue, and browns look beige. Ugh! Contrast is fairly solid, although there are a
few scenes in which its levels are weaker than anticipated. Film grain is
unevenly represented – thick and accounted for in certain scenes, while
practically nonexistent in others. The 2.0 mono DTS audio is tinny and limited –
no surprise there. The only extra is a superb audio commentary featuring Lee
Gambin and Emma Westwood, who have great chemistry and regard for each other’s
knowledge, occasionally, correcting one another on their flubbed facts. It’s
really a great listen. Bottom line: Portrait
in Black ought to have been given a new 1080p scan with color correction,
base-line clean-up and image stabilization applied. It received none of these
luxuries. This 1080p transfer looks as though it were fed through a meat
grinder. Terrible! Simply, awful! Regrets.
FILM RATING (out of 5 – 5 being the best)
3.5
VIDEO/AUDIO
1
EXTRAS
1
Comments