JEZEBEL: Blu-ray (Warner Bros. 1938) Warner Archive
In retrospect,
William Wyler’s Jezebel (1938) marked the beginning of a real turning
point in Bette Davis’ Warner Bros. career. For certain, Davis had kicked around
– and had been kicked around – the back lots of Universal and Warner’s
for most of the decade; a bright young thing with a lot of promise and guts,
mercilessly made over in the ‘blonde dolly’ mold of another
up-and-coming Jean Harlow; alas, put into some truly atrocious B-pictures of
such questionable merit, they served no real purpose – not even to glimpse the
powerhouse Davis would eventually become in the forties. Davis emergence as a ‘star’
to be reckoned with did not happen overnight. Nor did success come easily.
Indeed, Davis, frustrated and angry, defied Jack Warner by stepping outside the
boundaries of her ironclad studio contract, was blacklisted by Jack, not to win
the Oscar for her scathing portrait of Mildred Rogers – a common whore in Of
Human Bondage (1934), but was then given the opportunity to play a similar bitch
in heels for Jack in Dangerous (1935, an inferior pic that did
win her the coveted Academy Award. Who said the Oscars weren’t political?).
The more
unlikely fallout from this bitter split and reunion was that Davis was given a
level of control over her subsequent projects that, even by today’s standards, is
fairly progressive. Reset: Jack Warner was not a progressive. Some of
his detractors would argue that he was not even human - much less humane. Neither
was he particularly interested in allowing Davis to have her own way. But Jack
had ulterior motives in affording Davis some latitude; certain, she would make an
epic creative misfire of her newfound freedom, resulting in a bad movie that
would (A) end her popularity with fans, and (B) convince Davis that he knew
best. Too bad for Jack, Davis knew better than he. So, Warner would regret his
decision – marginally, reaping the box office benefits but otherwise playing to
Davis’ uncanny intuition in knowing what material suited her best. Davis and Warner
fought like cats and dogs throughout most of her studio tenure; Jack, rumored
to duck into the men’s lav whenever he saw Davis approaching, just to avoid
another confrontation. “Although he respected me in the end,” Davis
later mused in an interview, “…at least…I think he did.”
In hindsight, putting
Davis in the proverbial ‘driver’s seat’ of her own career did Jack no favors
behind the scenes. It also did his studio no harm. Indeed, Davis made Warner
Bros. a lot of money. And the true kick start to Bette Davis’ renaissance was
unquestionably, Jezebel – the grand concession made to her after
Jack’s sweetheart’s pitch to David O. Selznick for the loan out of both Errol
Flynn and Davis to co-star in Selznick’s Gone with the Wind miserably
failed to garner the indie producer’s interest. It should be noted Jack’s offer
came with a generous cash stipend too. So, Selznick’s resistance to it was even
more transparently predicated on his dislike of Davis, who had campaigned
aggressively for the part of Scarlett O’Hara, and, with such a fervor that
Selznick eventually relented to see the actress in his office. “I just don’t
understand why I can’t have the part,” Davis is rumored to have said, to
which Selznick coolly replied, “…because I just can’t imagine any man
chasing after a woman for twenty years and winding up with you!” Typical
Selznick – all heart. And Bette Davis, to be sure, was not conventional beauty.
In point of fact, neither was Scarlett O’Hara, at least as described by
Margaret Mitchell in the novel. Davis was, however, a superb actress. And with
no aspersions cast on Vivien Leigh – who became the embodiment of Hollywood’s
idea of Scarlett O’Hara in Selznick’s Southern spectacle, what Gone with the
Wind might have been with Bette Davis as its star is a fascinating
contemplation. Spurned from ‘the wind’, Jack Warner had the answer to Davis’
bitter woe – also, the chutzpah to beat Selznick to the punch with his own
Southern dance; buying up Owen Davis’ play, Jezebel, with
Davis’ rival, Miriam Hopkins, playing the salacious and passion-driven
spitfire.
To say Bette
Davis gave everything she had to the big screen reincarnation of Julie Marsden (Julie
Kendrick in the play) is an understatement.
Apart from her startling transformation into the sort of coquettish
southern belle that Scarlett O’Hara (at least in the early parts of Gone
with the Wind) would typify one year later, Davis’ smoldering contempt for
authority on the Warner back lot perfectly translates into a willful defiance of
the societal conventions that fueled Julie’s tragic romance with barrister,
Preston Dillard (Henry Fonda). It is the malignancy in Davis’s self-serving,
yet self-destructive characterization, the ego-driven malice with which her
Julie deliberately casts aside happiness, along with all cautious restraint,
that makes this Julie an utterly fascinating horror of a human being to behold.
Davis exudes a sort of toxic sex appeal – a real noir-like femme fatale,
miraculously transplanted into the land of cavaliers and cotton fields. It must
have irked Davis’ frequent co-star, George Brent (cast as Buck Cantrell, Preston’s
rival for Julie’s affections) to know that by the time Jezebel went
before the cameras, Davis had moved on to a rather notorious love affair with
director, William Wyler.
While Davis was ‘between’
marriages at the time of their tryst, Wyler was – decidedly – wed to his second
wife, Margaret Tallichet (to whom he would remain married for the rest of his
life). In her biography, Davis infamously described Wyler as ‘the one that
got away’; their on again/off again flagrante delicto, continuing through
two more pictures together; 1940’s The Letter, and 1941’s The Little
Foxes (an exceptional movie, but an otherwise terrible ‘working’ experience
for them both). Evidently, by the mid-1970’s all of this pent-up acrimony abated
and Davis, with clear-eyed fond recollection for those early years in both
their careers, publicly cited Wyler as the finest director for whom she had
ever worked. The proof is in the pictures; Wyler’s seemingly effortless light
touch, the result of a lot of sternly situated dictation that often resulted in
hurt feelings and endless retakes to get everything just right. “I can honestly say that he trained me to
be a far, far better actress,” Davis told Merv Griffin in 1972, “I would
have jumped in the Hudson River if he had told me to…he really started the
whole basic ‘star’ part of my career. One felt very secure with Willy.”
At its crux, Jezebel
is the tale of a woman who must bend, but refuses to break under the most
hellish of circumstances. Julie’s defiance of convention in wearing an
ostentatious red gown to the Olympus Ball, publicly humiliates her family and
beau. It all but ostracizes her from descent society, and, cruelly derails her
romantic ambitions to become Pres’ wife. Later, with the advent of Pres’
marriage to Amy Bradford (Margaret Lindsay), Julie’s tailspin into jealousy
pits the unwitting Buck against Pres’ younger brother in a duel. And finally,
as she defies all common sense, taking Amy’s place to nurse an ailing Pres’, stricken
with yellow fever, being carted off to her own certain death, we witness Julie’s
grave sacrifice. And yet, ostensibly, she has not matured one bit from that
first instance when we witness her plotting, in all her laced finery, to wear
the proverbial ‘pants’ in their relationship – and this, at a time when only
pantaloons were allowed! Now, in death, Julie claims the man of her heart – or some
such appendage – as her rightful property – all magnanimity set aside as she descends
into hell on earth from which neither will return.
Jezebel is an excoriating
story about feminine ferocity with Davis typifying to perfection this dangerous
‘hell cat’. Davis exudes a sort of malevolent treachery against any shred of
what ‘then’ passed for common decency. And yet, she does so with an underlying,
purposeful and deep-seeded need to belong to someone. Only in the picture’s
middle act does Davis allow Julie’s tiara to slip just a little, as she
succumbs to an all-consuming depression, though not necessarily repenting for
her sins. Julie Marsden is like the thief – not particularly sorrowful she stole,
but bitterly disappointed she was caught. Her recalcitrance brought to heel in
Pres’ absence, Julie’s reunion with Pres’ – only to learn of his marriage to
Amy – is the final rejection that turns these psychological scars septic and triggers
the repeal of her promised reformation to the deceptive and cruel scheming of
her old ways. A tag line from the mid-forties claimed ‘no one is as good as
Bette Davis when she is being bad.’ And yet Jezebel, apart from typifying the
thirties’ ilk in woman’s pictures to a tee, especially with Wyler’s alteration
to the play’s original ending, steeped in that cinema-coded philosophy that
aimed for any woman of strong will and sound mind be made to pay for stepping
outside the boundaries of ‘her place’ in society, is, in fact, the
quintessential template for Bette Davis to emerge at her most ruthless, purposive
and unyielding. Julie sacrifices her life to endure the perils of the plague with
Pres’ in the end – yes. But does she do this out of her obsessive love for the
man, or to get back even at he who snubbed her by marrying another? Or is it
spite, for Amy? Or Pres’ – to prove, even in his delirium, that he wed the
wrong woman – one who now, in his true hour of need, allows ‘the other woman’
to look after the man she promised to stand by in sickness and in health? Wyler was, in fact, criticized at the time for
altering the ending of the movie. In the play, Julie does not accompany Pres’
to this awful destination. And there is no retribution for Julie either. She
simply goes on.
Plot wise: we
are transplanted to New Orleans, circa 1852 (or, a reasonable facsimile on the
Warner back lot; actually, an exquisite one, designed by Robert M. Haas, with
Orry-Kelly’s superb costumed recreations of the antebellum South, luminously
photographed through gauze in B&W by the great Ernest Haller). We are introduced
to the overindulged and strong-willed plantation flower, Julie Marsden – a very
rare breed, and, her genteel and introspective, Aunt Belle Massey (the
wonderful Fay Bainter). Julie has prospects – yes, indeed. Preston Dillard, a
prominent and rising attorney at law has been courting the country gal for some
time, much to the chagrin of Buck Cantrell – by no means ‘a gentleman’
but otherwise, steadfast in his lust for Julie. While she does not promote his
advances, in point of fact, Julie finds Buck’s constant presence flattering.
Dr. Livingston (the always to be counted up stalwart, Donald Crisp) admires
Pres’. The young lawyer is precisely the ‘steady rock’ a girl like Julie, with
a wild streak, needs to rein in her high spirits and be transformed into a lady
of stature. Pres’ brother, Ted (Richard Cromwell) is not particularly ‘for’ the
marriage. Urged by the town council, including Gen. Theopholus Bogardus (Henry
O’Neill) to consider a life in politics, Pres’ is flattered but not entirely
certain he wants to pursue such an appointment.
Julie arrives at
Pres’ offices to discover him pleasantly ensconced with pressing matters. He
will make a fine husband, even if Buck believes their love-making to fall short
of the sort of ‘distractions’ he could provide for Julie, if only she would
allow him ‘the honor’ of her company. Julie insists Pres’ accompany her to
various dress makers for a suitable gown for the Olympus Ball – a debutante’s ‘coming
out’ party, at which time their engagement will be officially announced. Pres’
however, refuses to go. He has a will of his own, not to be a cuckold to any
woman or even cajoled into shirking his responsibilities. Determined to avenge
this snub, Julie takes Aunt Belle shopping with her instead. However, after
trying on several virginal white ensembles, Julie’s attentions are drawn to a
scarlet gown. Aunt Belle cautions Julie for her headstrong resolve to wear ‘red’
– the color for ‘whores’ – in lieu of the societal-prescribed ‘white’ – the proper
hue for all unmarried girls preparing to be given away in holy matrimony. Shunning
all convention with her usual devil-may-care attitude, Julie buys the scarlet
dress anyway and prepares for the ball. However, when Pres’ arrives to collect
Julie, he orders her to change clothes. She refuses. To prove his point, Pres’
takes Julie to the ball in her red gown, immediately shocking the other
debutantes, and virtually alienating all of their friends in an instance. Having
suddenly come to her senses, and recognizing the magnitude of her blunder,
Julie pleads with Pres’ to take her home. Instead, he caps off her humiliation
by insisting on a dance, escorting her around the floor, even ordering the
orchestra to play on after they have momentarily paused at the behest of one of
the ball’s sponsors, purposely to make both his point and Julie’s shame
complete.
Returning to the
plantation, Pres’ implicitly breaks off his engagement to Julie. She has proven unequivocally not to be the
right girl for him. It is a matter of honor and tradition – concepts that,
apparently, mean nothing to her, and worse, have disrespected his station,
simply to spite him on a childish whim. Believing Pres’ is bluffing, Julie
arrogantly slaps his face. He departs, more determined than ever to be rid of
her. Knowing better, a teary-eyed Aunt Belle urges Julie to beg for Pres’
forgiveness. But Julie, still thinks her charm will lure Pres’ back, and
absolutely refuses to bend for him now. Within days of the ball, Pres’ has made
a momentous decision; to move north on business. He departs New Orleans and
Julie, only now begun to realize the severity of her actions, falls into a deep
depression. She shudders the plantation and refuses to entertain what few
guests come to inquire about her health. A whole year passes. At the behest of Dr. Livingston, Pres’ agrees
to come home to New Orleans to convince the city’s council certain sanitation
measures must be taken to prevent an outbreak of yellow fever. Learning of his
return, Julie reopens the house with grand plans for a lavish homecoming,
wearing her very best ‘white’ party dress, and quite certain she and Pres’ will,
at long last, reconcile their differences and be reunited. Isolating Pres’ in
her salon before the party, she kneels before him, begs his forgiveness, and,
promises to be the sort of wife he has always expected.
Unhappy
circumstance, Pres’ now introduces Julie to his new bride, the cultured
northerner, Amy Bradford Dillard. Innocent of their past, Amy is pleased to meet
Julie at long last. Julie feigns a reciprocation of their joy and best wishes,
but later retreats to her room in tears. Aunt Belle reasons there was a woman
in Biblical times – Jezebel – who did wrong in the sight of God and had to pay
for her sins too. Regrouping, but bitterly dismayed, Julie reverts to her
former difficult self, goading Buck, a skilled duelist, to pick a quarrel with
Pres’. Alas, her scheme goes awry when Ted, an inexperienced marksman, accepts
the challenge on his brother’s behalf. The men meet on an open field beyond the
plantation. However, in a gracious whim of fate, Ted actually shoots and kills
Buck. There is little time to digest the loss, as what Dr. Livingstone has
feared all along has come to pass. A deadly outbreak of yellow fever is
sweeping through the South, decimating families with its lethal disease. As New
Orleans is gripped by the plague, the men gather inside the hotel bar to debate
the city’s evacuation. Pres’ succumbs to
the first signs of yellow fever, collapsing on the floor. While all others,
even Ted, refuse to come to his aid, Dr. Livingston rises to the occasion,
carrying Pres’ over his shoulder and back to the house. Julie attends her former lover, plying him with
cold compresses. In his delirium, Pres’ mumbles an ode of love, and Amy
believes he has never stopped loving Julie, despite having married her. As the
hospital wagons arrive to collect Pres, doomed to die with the others on a
nearby island in isolation, Julie begs Amy to be allowed to accompany him on
this last length of his journey, knowing she too will likely contract yellow
fever and die. Only after Julie confides
Pres’ no longer had any lingering affections for her, does Amy acquiesce to her
act of redemption. The movie concludes with Julie staring off in the distance, clinging
to Pres’ side in the back of a horse-drawn cart, surrounded by torch bearers.
Both artistically
and financially, Jezebel achieved Jack Warner’s fondest ambitions as a
top-flight entertainment; one that managed to catch the tail fires of Margaret
Mitchell’s Gone with the Wind a whole year ahead of Selznick’s Herculean
effort to bring that novel to the big screen. While controversy and calamity
continued to swirl around Selznick’s pre-production, Jack’s southern melodrama
was sashaying across movie screens all across the country and ringing registers
loudly. Even if Selznick could not see the virtues in any man, much less Rhett
Butler, chasing after a woman of such fiery disposition for nearly two hours,
only to wind up with Bette Davis as his prize, the public and critics
whole-heartedly disagreed with Selznick’s myopic view of Davis’ virtues as an
actress. Jezebel was nominated for 5 Academy Awards, including Best
Picture. It lost to Frank Capra’s You Can’t Take It With You. But Bette
Davis was well compensated for the Scarlett snub, taking home Oscar’s little
gold guy for Best Actress. Fay Bainter also had good reason to smile on Oscar
night – winning Best Supporting Actress. That William Wyler was not even
nominated for Best Director is an obscenity in Oscar lore – one of many, I
might add. The list of bridesmaids in Academy history is long and distinguished;
arguably, even more so than any comprehensive list of its winners. So, Wyler
was in very good company indeed.
Only a year
earlier, Davis had stormed out of her Warner contract, departed for Europe -
determined to make movies abroad to prove to Jack - and the world - she was
more than just the glam-bam dolly they had tried so desperately to make of her.
And while Davis may not have won this battle (the courts ruled in Jack’s
favor), she most definitely won the war. Beginning with Jezebel, better parts
lay ahead in one of the industry’s irrefutably stellar and Teflon-coated
careers. In hindsight, there were many leading ladies from Hollywood’s golden
era that dazzled us with their sincerity, determination, and, forthright and
clear-eyed comprehension of the female soul exposed for all to see. Even within
this pantheon of stellar screen goddesses, there was only one Bette Davis. And
so, Davis, since her passing in 1989, has defied the passage of time; transcended
it, not merely as a bona fide star among stars, one that burnt hard and bright,
but as a true ‘immortal’ from that bygone glamor factory, the likes of which
will never be seen again. Davis’ back catalog, Jezebel included – Jezebel,
arguably, above all others – is a perennial pleasure to peruse. It doesn’t
date. Like virtually all of the truly
great movies from this period, Jezebel was heavily rewritten for the
screen to suit its star’s temperament, with contributions from John Huston,
Robert Buckner, Clements Ripley and Abem Finkel, leaving only faint flickers of
Owen Davis’ original stagecraft. What endures is the celebration of Bette Davis
– star; playing to her strengths as a contemptible, yet compelling minx. Precisely how much of Davis was in Julie
Marsden remains open for discussion. And Davis once claimed proudly that only a
woman of virtue could play a deliciously manipulative man trap. “If I were
really like all those awful bitches, I should think I would have wanted to keep
it a secret and not let the whole world see me for who and what I really am.”
Owing to a
devastating nitrate fire in the mid-1970’s, Jezebel on home video has
never looked better than adequate on home video. Originally running 104 min.,
by 1947 the studio, in its infinite wisdom had shorn 11 minutes for a theatrical
reissue, cutting down the original camera negative and presumably junking these
excisions. Somewhere along the way, this
original camera negative in totem was also lost, leaving dupe negatives as the
only surviving source for future prints, with baked-in age-related artifacts
knocking down the video quality another several notches. So, to discover Warner
Archive’s newly remastered Blu-ray looking light years younger than anything
this movie has is – to put things mildly – a revelation. Produced from a very
early lavender, the results speak for themselves; velvety blacks with zero crush,
exceptional grey scale tonality, pitch perfect shadows and exceptionally
refined film grain. Even better, the audio has been meticulously restored,
revealing acoustic subtleties in Max Steiner’s brilliant main title and score
that I never expected to hear. WAC has
pulled out all the stops on this one, folks. Any film lover worth his/her weight
in celluloid ought to be singing WAC’s praises after seeing this. Extras are
all hold-overs from the retired DVD, and include an audio commentary from
historian, Jeanine Basinger and an all too brief featurette: ‘Jezebel -
Legend of the South’. WAC has also ported over a few short subjects and
the movie’s original theatrical trailer. Bottom line: Jezebel on Blu-ray
– how could you not?!? Very highly recommended. One of the landmark hi-def
releases of 2019! Note to the good people at Warner Bros. – many, many thanks.
PS – more, please!
FILM RATING (out
of 5 – 5 being the best)
5+
VIDEO/AUDIO
5+
EXTRAS
3
Comments