LA DOLCE VITA: Blu-ray re-issue (Riama/Pathe/Gray Films, 1960) Paramount VS. Criterion
Mixing the sacred with the profane,
director Federico Fellini arguably reached the zenith of his career with La
Dolce Vita (1960) – most certainly, the apex of his early career with this
scathing indictment on the culture of celebrity, breathtakingly photographed in
widescreen and B&W. La Dolce Vita is, at once, an
exaltation/indictment of the urban decay and decadence in Italy’s jaded postwar
renaissance and an uber exaltation of the rot and rags out of which post-war
Italy was still struggling to find its modern self. An absorbing amalgam of our
sycophantic admiration for all things celebrity, La Dolce Vita made the
buxom Anita Ekberg and Italy’s export, Marcello Mastroianni internationally
famous. Mastroianni’s career, in particular, took off like a rocket after this
movie’s debut. The film’s original producer, Dino De Laurentis had endeavored
to convince Fellini to cast Paul Newman in the lead - in hindsight, an
unthinkable prospect. Fellini instead pursued Mastroianni who had recently had
great success in a pair of films: Le Notti Bianche (White Nights,
1957) and Big Deal on Madonna Street (1958).
Fellini reportedly wanted “a
very normal face…one without personality.”
While this last statement is certainly debatable, Mastroianni, in
hindsight, having one of the most iconic visages of the latter 20th century, La
Dolce Vita is undeniably blessed to have Mastroianni as its titular hero.
There’s a bottled-up, clear-eyed, class-conscious and world-weary sexual
frustration to the movie’s Marcello Ribini, bored and following his crotch
through a series of misadventures taking place over the course of seven sunlit
days, but mostly during a series of unfulfilled starry nights, fettered by
Ribini’s inability to follow through with any satisfying sexual liaison. Even
his diverting tryst with the affluent cat-like socialite, Maddalena (Anouk
Aimée) is more of a transient episode. Their meeting in a prostitute’s
waterlogged basement apartment marks Fellini’s projection of that sinking
feeling each experiences at the prospects of finding love with an ‘improper’
stranger. It won’t work. It’s a snore. But ‘what the hell?’…it passes the
time.
In many ways, La Dolce Vita
is like a dream remembered…or rather, one its protagonists would most like to
forget. Even its title, loosely translated as ‘the sweet life’ is ironic,
Fellini gradually revealing the imperfectability of any life – affluent or
‘un’. None of these characters have attained personal contentment, each
desiring to become something they are not and all, blindsided by their chase
after the specter of those proverbial ‘greener pastures’ on the ‘other side’ of
the fence. Ostensibly, the only
commonality between tabloid reporter, Marcello Ribini and the present object of
his desire, American film siren, Sylvia (Anita Ekberg) is their shared boredom
with life. Hers is a ‘happily obtuse’ counterpoint to his more sullen and
desperate longing for escape. Together, they aimlessly drift through their
isolated existences, perhaps too painful to more concretely acknowledge. And
the grass is hardly greener in Fellini’s dystopian postwar reconstruction of Italy.
Fellini mourns the loss of traditions, faded in the harsh afterglow of the
paparazzi’s flashbulbs, and stardom, is reconstituted not as that glamorous
epoch of golden-era escapism, but as crassly commercial celebrity. The urban
landscape here is more than vaguely reminiscent of Hiroshima’s nuclear fallout,
with monolithic apartment complexes scattered across grassless turf, craggy
rubble and stone and dirt roads littered with human debris.
Nowhere is Fellini’s complicated
concurrence between the sacrosanct and irreligious more readily on display than
in the sequence where two impoverished children claim to have witnessed the
Virgin Mary next to a solitary tree in a desolate field - a staged event made
even more horrendously false by the sudden appearance of the paparazzi, who
erect scaffolding and klieg lights all around this supposedly hallowed spot,
photographing family members on a balcony in deliberately posed supplications
to the Almighty. The sequence, one of the lengthiest, brings into question
Marcello’s own faith – and not only in miracles. It also, magnifies the
fracture in his own relationship with live-in, Emma (Yvonne Furneaux) who has
attempted suicide several times because she suspects Marcello has been
unfaithful to her. Fellini’s own relationship with Catholicism was tricky and
frequently the subtext (or even the subject) of his movie explorations.
Fellini’s struggle to make sense of it all, to justify the foibles of humanity
set against imagined manifestations and the more concrete symbols of God’s work
on earth (a.k.a, the church) leads to several spellbinding vignettes scattered
throughout La Dolce Vita.
Fellini’s harshest critics have often misconstrued his efforts as being
overly critical of his own faith. But in hindsight, it is the mechanics behind
these critiques that seem more richly deserving of our attention and, on the
whole, deeply probative and satisfying.
As example: Fellini opens La
Dolce Vita with an image of a stone-carved Christ, arms outstretched and
sailing over the urban topography with cables attached to a helicopter. This
celestial illusion garners the attentions of a flock of bikini-clad sunbathers,
lounging on a rooftop. “Look, it’s Jesus!” one sun worshipper playfully
declares, “Where is he going?” There is another helicopter following
close behind, carrying members of the press, including Marcello, far more
interested in getting one of the girl’s phone numbers than in the destination
of this graven image. At once, Fellini is undercutting the importance of the
Christ figure. But in another consideration, he may be offering a sincere
commentary that bemoans the lack of God’s influence on contemporary society,
the diminishment of the church’s authority and autonomy quite clear. The age of
technology (i.e. the helicopters) commands the direction of salvation itself, a
foreshadowing to our present-day dependence – nee worship – of man-made
progress. This, perhaps, is Fellini’s way of suggesting how technology will
lead mankind astray and to his own eventual ruin.
Later, Fellini stages the first
‘cute meet’ between Sylvia and Marcello high atop the Vatican. Yet again, his
focus is twofold – on Sylvia’s naïve beguilement as she ascends the stairs,
seemingly closer to heaven, but also, on Marcello, succumbing to the pit of his
carnal pursuit even as he makes his way towards this pinnacle of supreme
religiosity. To punctuate the point, Sylvia is sheathed in an impossibly
fanciful, and cleavage revealing garment designed by Piero Gherardi,
reminiscent of a priest’s vestment, complete with wide-brimmed hat and tassel.
Having reached the balcony, a strong gust of wind tears the hat from Sylvia’s
wavy blonde tresses, in essence, defrocking her in Marcello’s presence. There
is more than a hint of naughty eroticism to this moment, writ large on
Marcello’s mien, but alas, to remain unfulfilled as Fellini moves us from the dawn
into Rome’s bustling nightlife. Fellini’s then juxtaposition of this mostly
barren contemporary landscape gives way to flashes of the ‘old world’ Rome made
full and luscious in movies like Roman Holiday (1953) and Three Coins
in A Fountain (1954). But Fellini’s version of the Via Veneto is actually a
set built on the back lot at Cinecittà Studios, evoking a more regal era,
presently distilled by a sort of embalmed glamour as the glitterati meet and
frolic. The illusion is uncanny. Anita Ekberg is spun around the dance floor of
an outdoor nightclub like an airborne top-heavy albatross by the enigmatic and
curly haired, Frankie Stout (Alain Dijon). Here is an image as indelible and as
devastating as the much-touted and perennially revived ‘fountain sequence’,
with Ekberg playing to Fellini’s vacuous image of the American movie star -
more symbol than substance, and, onto which every man can – and usually does –
project his own masochistic fantasies.
Marcello Ribini’s are hardly cerebral, although he harbors a particularly
farfetched opinion of this glamor gal as all things to every man – whatever his
taste or season. “You are the first woman on the first day of creation. You
are mother, sister, lover, friend, angel, devil, earth, home,” Marcello
tells Sylvia as they slink together in the Trevi Fountain. But these are
dreamlike properties Sylvia does not possess. In fact, they can only be seen
through the eyes of a daydreamer like Marcello, whose passion impugned is
rechanneled into platitudes bestowed on an unworthy of such praise.
It’s Marcello’s misfortune, in
fact, that he cannot work up even the basest affections for Emma who has grown
possessive and unyielding in their absence. Marcello is, in fact, very cruel to
Emma. “A man who agrees to live like this is a finished man,” he tells her, “He's
nothing but a worm! I don't believe in your aggressive, sticky, maternal love!
I don't want it! I have no use for it! This isn't love! It's brutalization!” Alas, Marcello is too caught up in the
emptiness of the physical to appreciate the inner strength of sentiment or –
more to the point – the content of a real woman’s character. His deification of
the external represents Fellini’s own partial condemnation of Hollywood and its
shift away from genuine talent to attractive pin-ups who are little more – if
anything – than what they first appear. Of course, Marcello isn’t much more
clairvoyant at spotting the true merit in men either. He placates his own
father (Annibale Ninchi) with an air of self-pity for this aged bon vivant;
amusing, but past his prime, and he chooses to embrace the affluent Steiner
(Alain Cuny) as his contemporary instead. Once again, it’s through Marcello’s
inability to connect with even his own past, exemplified by his total lack of
contact with the folks back home, and presently, his estrangement from this man
who gave him life, that Fellini offers a more painful critique of the
disconnect between the older and younger generations; the solidness of
tradition forsaken for a fast and urbane materialism, promising so much, but
proven equally as unfulfilling. Marcello is, therefore, still searching for his
place in the world, believing it will be discovered somewhere higher up the
proverbial ‘food chain’ of life.
Marcello’s counterbalance in La
Dolce Vita is Steiner, an affluent Jewish industrialist with an insular
sycophantic following of pseudo-intellectuals - poets, artists, self-proclaimed
prophets and lazy-headed drifters. To Marcello, Steiner has everything he would
hope for himself; money, position, respect. Alas, this too is mere illusion,
Steiner pointing out to Marcello this unattractive artificiality in a
startlingly predictive moment. “Don't be like me,” Steiner quietly
implores, “Salvation doesn't lie within four walls. I'm too serious to be a
dilettante and too much a dabbler to be a professional. Even the most miserable
life is better than a sheltered existence in an organized society where
everything is calculated and perfected.” Two underlying currents of
dissension run through La Dolce Vita, the screenplay by Fellini, Ennio
Flaiano, Tullio Pinelli and Brunello Rondi (with contributions made by an
un-credited Pier Paolo Pasolini) focusing on the sterility of contemporary
society – all plasticized flashiness and bounce, but no nub beyond its own
navel-gazing, and the homogenized ennui its wanderers have with life in
general. Fellini’s predictions of an imploding culture, having sacrificed its
principles and faith for nothing better than a mindless weekend getaway to the
Riviera, rings more ominously true with each passing year. Fellini was, in
fact, heavily criticized for this unflinching critique, remaining unapologetic
of his views. But for some time thereafter, La Dolce Vita was to endure
as his most controversial and financially successful movie; the latter a source
of contention, as Fellini had signed away all rights to a percentage of the
profits in trade to secure the necessary funds for his recreation of the Via
Veneto on Cinecittà’s back lot.
Yet, Fellini was hardly
contemptuous of the city that had given birth to his fertile imagination and
renown to his reputation as a film-maker. He once explained his affinity for
Rome – unquestionably, as much a character in La Dolce Vita as any of
flesh and blood – thus; like an extension of his own apartment, the sloppy way
its inhabitants meandered to and fro, with an entitled familiarity, from the
crowded piazzas to the equally congested streets and down the tight little
alleys and byways. Viewed in this light, La Dolce Vita is very much a
celebration of Rome, Fellini bringing an intimacy to these fantastic
proceedings; some, even more remarkably, borrowed from life. The famed moonlit
dip in the Trevi Fountain, as example, (shot under frigid conditions in the
middle of February no less) was excised from an incident involving Anita
Ekberg. A real-life ex-Miss Sweden and professional model, she had cut her foot
during a photo shoot for Pierluigi Praturlon, electing to wash the wound in the
fountain’s waters. One thing led to another and before Pierluigi realized it,
Ekberg had waded into the fountain. In La Dolce Vita, Fellini uses the
Trevi Fountain to extraordinary effect to punctuate a moment of anticipated
consummation suddenly denied, the turning off of the waters, symbolic of a more
deep-seeded impotence that plagues our disillusioned hero for the rest of the
movie.
La Dolce Vita begins with a
lengthy prologue: a helicopter carrying the stone Christ past the ancient Roman
aqueducts, accompanied by a second copter transporting Marcello Rubini and
other members of the paparazzi en route to cover the story. Momentarily sidetracked by a gaggle of
rooftop sunbathers, Marcello is unsuccessful at getting any of their phone
numbers, the copter turning in pursuit of the statue to Saint Peter's. We shift
focus to a posh nightclub, Marcello casually hooking up with the affluent,
Maddalena; a spoiled, bored and morally bankrupt gadabout who is on a constant
quest for ‘new sensations’ as she puts it, of which Marcello just happens to be
the latest. Unlike Marcello, who prefers the autonomy of a big city he can
effectively disappear into, Maddalena would much prefer anyplace but Rome.
Picking up Ninni (Adriana Moneta) a prostitute who needs a lift back to her
apartment, the pair is invited into Ninni’s basement for a cup of coffee.
Fellini mixes humor with pathos here. Ninni’s waterlogged digs also afford him
an opportunity to infuse a bit of social commentary about the squalid living
conditions in these new housing projects. Maddalena wastes no time seduce
Marcello. It doesn’t take much. But even they can both see the spark in their
illicit flagrante delicto has fizzled. They go through the mechanics of having
sex, but their hearts are not in it.
Returning to his apartment at the
break of dawn, Marcello discovers his fiancée, Emma has attempted suicide by
swallowing a whole bottle of pills. It isn’t the first time either. At once
outraged, forlorn and panicky, Marcello rushes Emma to the hospital; perhaps most
concerned over how her death might cast a pall on his own reputation. From this low-key of ‘almost’ tragedies,
Fellini segues into La Dolce Vita’s most stylish vignette: the arrival of
American film star, Sylvia at Ciampino Airport; the voluminous uber-fairytale
princess of the movies inundated by a barrage of flashbulbs and obtuse
questions from the paparazzi. Any sound bite will do. Marcello telephones Emma
from the hotel press conference, accused of being alone with Sylvia when, in
fact, there are more than fifty reporters in the suite, each salivating for a
headline. Sylvia’s boyfriend, Robert (Lex Barker) arrives late to these
proceedings - his usual inebriated self; Marcello diffusing the tension in the
air by suggesting Sylvia be taken on a tour of St. Peter’s Basilica.
Dressed in a black frock
reminiscent of a priest’s sacramental vestments, Sylvia ascends the steep
winding staircase to the top of the dome, pursued by various members of the
paparazzi, whom she tires out: all except Marcello, although even he is winded
as he rejoins Sylvia on the balcony overlooking Vatican square. A strong gust
of wind tears Sylvia’s hat off. She and Marcello wistfully stare at one another
for a long moment. Fellini cuts to the evening, the Baths of Caracalla, then an
outdoor nightclub. The arrival of Sylvia in a stunning cleavage-revealing gown,
its silken entrails flaring about as she dances, ignites the room in an
incendiary and unbridled display of human sexuality. The tenor here gets
elevated to near orgy status by the arrival of an old flame, Frankie Stout,
momentarily causing Marcello to feel like a cast off. Robert is seemingly
disinterested in Sylvia’s flagrant display, too intoxicated to care but not
nearly drunk enough to hold his tongue; his glib admonishment, enough to wound
Sylvia’s feelings. She takes off in a huff and Marcello promises to bring her
back.
Alas, the night has other plans for
them. Marcello pursues Sylvia as she explores the deserted alleyways, taking
pity on a poor white kitten she coddles and caresses in a way Marcello would so
obviously prefer to be held. Encouraging Marcello to find some milk for the
poor orphaned cat, Sylvia disappears into the night. Marcello discovers her
wading into the Trevi Fountain, outwardly under an otherworldly power, hearing
fantastic music inside her own head. Marcello is bewitched by Sylvia. She
encourages him and he follows her into the pool, presumably with the
anticipation of some fantastic overture to love reciprocated at long last. For
the briefest of moments, this appears to be Sylvia’s modus operandi. She gazes
adoringly at Marcello and reaches down to sprinkle a few beads of water atop
his head. Regrettably, with the first glints of rising sun the mood between
them is broken. Marcello drives Sylvia back to her hotel. Robert, who has been
waiting for her return all night, is in a foul temper and wallops Sylvia across
the cheek as several paparazzi snap the couple’s picture.
Fellini shifts focus with his next
vignette, to the objectives of Marcello’s life, or rather, his impossible
daydream – to be a man like his mentor, Steiner. The uber-rich,
ultra-sophisticated Steiner appears to have it all; money, family, and a
fabulous atelier populated by fashionable friends; truly the crème de la crème
of society. Steiner and Marcello meet inside a local church, Steiner showing
off his air of culture by playing Bach’s Toccata and Fugue on the pipe organ,
and later, by sharing his prized book of ancient Sanskrit. Marcello’s
infatuation with Steiner is fairly transparent and Steiner willingly invites
Marcello and Emma to his home for a weekend party. Later that same afternoon,
Marcello and Emma, along with Marcello’s photog/friend, Paparazzo (Walter
Santesso) make their pilgrimage to an abandoned field on the outskirts of Rome
to cover a story about two ghetto children having observed the sacred Madonna. Despite
protestations from the Catholic Church, the reported sighting has garnered a
large crowd of devotees. The arrival of the paparazzi transforms the unassuming
field into a garishly orchestrated three-ring circus. Regrettably, it all comes
to not, the candlelight vigil planned as the piece de resistance thwarted by
Mother Nature. An impromptu thunderstorm sends everyone scattering, the
worshipers turning rabid as they tear at the branches of a withered tree,
claimed to have sheltered the Virgin Mary. In the same instance, Emma solemnly
offers a prayer to be given exclusive possession of Marcello's heart. At the
break of dawn, it is discovered a sick child who was brought to the site by his
frantic mother to be healed, has been trampled to death in the hullabaloo.
Fellini now moves us into what is
perhaps La Dolce Vita’s most sobering vignette: Steiner’s house party – a
glittering assemblage of pseudo-intellectuals who, although present in the same
room, seem a disjointed bunch at best: one recites poetry, another strums a
guitar; the bandying about of philosophical ideas while listening to the banal
sounds of nature on a tape recorder more fraught with wasteful self-indulgence
than anything else. Fellini sets us up into believing Marcello and Emma are the
outsiders, when it is actually Steiner who is out of place among these
fair-weather friends. Isolated on a balcony, Marcello sincerely compliments
Steiner on a perfect evening. But Steiner is strangely despondent. Far from being contented, he philosophizes
about the need for love in the world and genuinely fears the many tomorrows his
children will have to face as adults. Spurred to make a sincere stab at his own
greatness, Marcello spends the next afternoon toiling on the first draft of his
novel, retreating to a lonely seaside restaurant to be at one with his
thoughts. Perhaps, left to his own accord he can free his mind. It is not to be
as the restaurant’s pubescent waitress, Paola (Valeria Ciangottini) plays Perez
Prado's infectious cha-cha on the jukebox while humming its tune. At first,
Marcello is perturbed with the girl, but softens after taking a more serious
look at her. She reminds him of an angel in the Umbrian paintings, and their
conversation takes on the flavoring of a paternal figure administering kindly
advice to the novice. She is innocent in the ways of the world and quite amused
by Marcello’s relaxed familiarity.
Returning to Rome without having written a word, Marcello is informed by
Paparazzo his father has come to town. Marcello is indeed surprised to see his
father in the flesh. After all, he has not been home, written or even called
his parents in quite some time.
Nevertheless, Ribini Sr. is delighted
to see his son, enjoying a good meal and chatting about his life and women.
Marcello and Paparazzo take his father to the Cha-Cha-Cha Club. There, Marcello
introduces him to Fanny (Magali Noël); an aged chorine and a former flame whose
photo Marcello promised to get in the paper. It never happened, and Fanny is
still mildly bitter. Her indignation abates, however, and she decides to show
Marcello and his father a good time. Together with Paparazzo and two other
dancers, everyone returns to Fanny’s flat. Marcello is uncomfortable with this
suggestion and decides to leave when they get to their destination.
Regrettably, the night is ruined for Marcello too when his father appears to
have suffered a minor heart attack in Fanny’s company. Marcello implores him to
see a doctor and stay in Rome. Ill and ailing, Ribini Sr. resists his son’s
compassion and elects instead to take the first train home. The big city has
worn him out. It’s no use. Marcello and his father will never be close. Fellini’s
final acts in La Dolce Vita ante up both the perversity and desperation
of our protagonist; Marcello attending a house party at the behest of Jane
(Audrey McDonald), an American heiress who is frivolous. The remote castle at
Bassano di Sutri outside Rome is owned by Jane’s aristocratic, though priggish
fiancée. But the gathering is hardly resplendent; rather, decadent and mildly
disturbing for its implied surrender to amorality. Nevertheless, Marcello is
surprised to see Maddalena there. She lures and isolates him in a room,
hurrying to another to test its echo chamber as she whispers a proposal of
marriage. Marcello hesitates, only replying that he loves her. In the meantime,
Maddalena is approached by another party guest (Romolo Giordani) who has no such
hang-ups about seducing her. She acquiesces and Marcello begrudgingly rejoins
the group, spending the night with Jane instead. Burnt out, the deflated
revelers trundle up the front walk toward the castle, met by its proprietress
on her way to church.
Sometime later, Marcello and Emma
are driving home along an isolated road when she makes her final play for him.
Marcello’s penultimate refusal, even to entertain the prospect, causes Emma to
pressure he stop the car immediately. She demands to know the reason why
Marcello does not love her as much as she so obviously, emphatically, and
greedily desires him. Marcello is frustrated and fed up. He pulls over,
abandoning Emma on the open road and in the dead of night, only to sheepishly
return early the next dawn and discover her not too far from where he left her.
Her abject surrender, as she slinks back into his car without a word is
disheartening at best. The two, predictably, wind up in bed a short while
later. Their peaceful slumber is intruded on by a telephone call, Marcello informed
that Steiner has murdered his two children and committed suicide. Waiting for Steiner’s wife (Renée Longarini)
to return home, Marcello breaks the horrific news, shielding her from the swarm
of ravenous reporters. Time passes: quite a lot of it, apparently. For when
next we meet Marcello, his jet-black mane has turned to greyish chalk. He
encourages a group of drunken partygoers to break into a Fregene beach house
owned by a man named Riccardo (Riccardo Garrone), presumably, a friend. To
inaugurate her recent divorce from Riccardo, Nadia (Nadia Gray) performs a
striptease, with Marcello provoking the revelers into an orgy. Alas, in all
their intoxication, this scene degenerates into an apathetic farce, Marcello
endeavoring to infuse some mania or eroticism – or both - into the moment by
tearing open feather-down pillows and riding a hunched-over young woman like a
pony around the room. Amidst this chaos,
Riccardo unexpectedly arrives, disgusted by what he sees and angrily ordering
the partiers to leave at once. Instead, their drunken revelry continues on the
beach, the old fools stumbling upon a stingray-like creature caught in a
fisherman’s net.
These final moments are perplexing
and reek of the pall of death, or rather, a queer finality to shattered dreams
and the pursuit of that illusive ‘sweet life’ Marcello has squandered his
entire youth in search of, but without success. The perplexity of these moments
arises from the return of Paola. She has not aged a bit since her first
encounter with Marcello – despite the fact he has -considerably - in the
interim. She beckons from across an
estuary, her words drowned out by the raging surf. Marcello signals his
inability to understand her (Fellini offering an obvious double entendre here)
and Paola rather awkwardly waves goodbye as Marcello returns to the carousers
instead. Fellini holds tight and long on the final close-up, an inscrutable
smile creeping across Paola’s cheeks. Is she pleased to have been briefly
reunited with this gentle man who once bestowed compliments upon her? Or is she
grieving the loss of the man she naively thought he was, or hoped he might live
up to satisfy her memories? We’re never entirely certain and perhaps this is
precisely Fellini’s point; that Marcello Ribini is a creature of misguided
habits; a man incapable of finding love even when it is clearly presented as a
viable alternative for the taking.
La Dolce Vita is a profoundly acidic fable, Fellini’s defiance of the 'then' popularized
neorealist movement in Italian film-making readily apparent. It is also the
story of a fantastically flawed man, almost inadvertently insincerely, and, sacrificing his own
everlasting happiness to temporary diversions of every shape and kind. Marcello
Mastroianni carves an indelible niche as the film’s non-existentialist surveyor
of life. Unable to commit to anything or anyone for very long, Mastroianni’s
alter ego is an affront to God’s destiny for man; like Steiner – a dabbler
without a purpose, doomed to perpetual dissatisfaction without ever
understanding the fundamental flaw in his character that prevents him from
moving forward. In place of this quest for absolution and fulfillment, Fellini
gives us a dark and demoralizing little adventure, one from which there is no
escape or even a shred of redemption for our tragic hero. The women in
Fellini’s chef d'oeuvre remain compelling codicils to this central chase; the
purposeless Sylvia, jaded Maddelena, wounded Emma, and, innocent Paola; each
offering Marcello momentary escapisms. It is Marcello’s inability to choose for
himself – not just wisely – but essentially; his dalliances with all eventually
depriving him from being worthy of any – that ultimately defeats the purpose of
his life’s journey. All of Fellini's
characters are unstable people; fractured individuals plagued by a
self-destructive quality. This kinetically draws them nearer to each other for
the briefest of flirtations. But it inevitably tears them apart. In the final
analysis, La Dolce Vita is a tantalizing chronicle, not so much for the
superficialities it brings to light, but for the sobering way it tempts
providence by undoing its characters at their core. Fellini does not give us
archetypes, per say. Rather, he illustrates the ease with which anyone may fall
into any number of such ‘categories’ by their own design; the tail wagging the
dog, as it were; people becoming slaves to their vices after all of their
virtues have been deliberately discarded.
Paramount has reissued La Dolce
Vita on Blu-ray, shorn of all the extra content that once accompanied the Criterion
debut, nearly 7 years ago. As La Dolce Vita from Criterion is still
readily available for purchase on Amazon, and at barely $15, there really is no
point to this reissue, which sports the identical transfer from 2014. The only
reason I haven’t posted Paramount’s rather lackluster artwork in lieu of the Criterion
here is that I could find no viable scan on the internet, and my scanner, alas,
has died. But I’ve just given this ‘new’ reissue a spin and comparatively,
there’s nothing to recommend it over the Criterion – not even the price point! Back
in 2014, La Dolce Vita was given an extensive 4K digital restoration
conducted by Cineteca Di Bologna - Laboratorio L'Immagine Ritrovata in
collaboration with The Film Foundation. This image harvest is derived from
original camera negatives shot in Totalscope by cinematographer extraordinaire,
Otello Martelli, with a few brief exceptions replaced by lavender prints,
necessary, due to mold damage and other age-related rot. The image is
consistently thick with good solid grain and contrast that yields super rich
black levels. The ‘wow!’ factor is in evidence in virtually every razor-sharp
frame. The visuals look extremely film-like and taking a quantum leap forward
in 1080p. Both the Paramount and the Criterion Blu-rays blow everything else
out of the water. So, prepare to be astonished. This is an impressive reference
quality disc, sure to provide decades of viewing pleasure.
Criterion’s Blu-ray also advances
in its PCM monaural soundtrack (the Paramount sports a 2.0 DTS - virtually indistinguishable from the PCM in overall fidelity), Nino Rota’s
score in particular sounding genuinely marvelous. Both Paramount and Criterion gives us optional English subtitles (Thank heaven! My Italian’s a
little rusty!). Criterion wins hands down by padding out the extras with new
interviews from assistant director, Lina Wertmüller, film scholar, David
Forgacs and Italian journalist, Antonello Sarno. Cumulatively, they add up to
just under fifty minutes of content, immeasurably fleshed out by a 1965
interview conducted by NBC’s Irving R. Levine, showcasing an ebullient Fellini
(30 min.) who runs the gamut of topics, from affectionately waxing about his
own work, to singing the praises of other filmmakers and finally, speaking to
his own ideals for making movies. Another vintage interview with Marcello Mastroianni
(almost 50 min.) follows. There’s also ‘Felliniana’: a curious
presentation of the private collection of film buff, Don Young, plus an all too
brief, but densely packed visual essay ‘The Eye and the Beholder’ by
filmmaker, Kogonada; deconstructing Fellini’s use of the mobile camera; plus,
liner notes by critic, Gary Giddins. The
Paramount disc is a bare-bones affair. Bottom line: I really am at a loss to
explain Paramount’s sudden interest to repackage La Dolce Vita on
Blu-ray. The Criterion single disc is still available, and the deluxe Federico
Fellini box set, also from Criterion, is out there too. So, triple dip from
Paramount, with no extras?!? Just dumb. The Criterion comes very highly
recommended! A real ‘must have’. The
Paramount makes no sense (cents) at all.
FILM RATING (out
of 5 - 5 being the best)
5+
VIDEO/AUDIO
Paramount and Criterion
5+
EXTRAS
Criterion 5
Paramount 0
Comments