ORDINARY PEOPLE: Paramount Presents... Blu-ray (Paramount, 1980) Paramount Home Video
The woman who could ‘turn the
world on with her smile’, Mary Tyler Moore was to forever alter the
public’s perception of that squeaky clean, congenial girl next door, honed from
seven years on one of TV’s most popular sitcoms, and even before, as the
fresh-faced spouse on The Dick Van Dyke Show (1961-66) in Robert
Redford’s motion picture directorial debut, Ordinary People (1980),
playing Beth, the emotionally absent and psychologically frigid wife and mother
of the affluent Jarrett family. For its time, Ordinary People was an
extraordinary achievement; Redford, assembling a stellar cast and working from
a superb screenplay by Alvin Sargent. Based on the novel by Judith Guest, Ordinary
People unravels a complex family dynamic in an affluent Chicago family. Mom,
Beth, dad, Calvin (Donald Sutherland) and their teenage son, Conrad (Timothy
Hutton) are all grappling with the unexpected death of their eldest - the
fair-haired all-American college-bound hunk, Buck (Scott Doebler), drowned in a
boating accident. Beth, who adored Buck with a strangely sexualized
infatuation, becomes emotionally estranged from the family. Calvin, more
concerned for Conrad, favors his temperament and sensitivity, especially since
Conrad attempted suicide on the first-year anniversary of Buck’s untimely
demise, blaming himself for being unable to save his brother after their boat
capsized in a gale.
Moore’s performance is startling,
particularly when viewed within the frame of reference of her television work.
Herein, she is positively bone-chilling, a woman so wounded by the loss of her
favorite offspring, she alienates the rest of her family from the possibility
of resuming a normal life in order to spare her closed-off sanity its
inevitable implosion. Redford plays up the queerly unsettling Oedipal
relationship between Beth and Buck – also hinted at in Guest’s novel. In
flashback, Buck is oddly more the amiable surrogate love interest – rather than
son – she, living vicariously through his overt machismo as he talks about
girlfriends and touch football. In one scene, Beth is sprawled on the front
lawn, playfully laughing like a foolish school girl while Buck recounts a glory
tale for his mother. Apart from this skewed adoration, all agree that Buck was
the ray of light in all their lives that kept the family functional - adored by
Calvin – even as he secretly worried about his risk-taking, and absolutely
worshiped by Conrad, the awkward and less physically prepossessing sibling.
Arguably, Beth resents Conrad’s complacency, his willingness – even contentment
– to merely exist in the shadow of Buck’s overwhelming popularity at school and
with the ladies.
For Conrad, it seems the adult
world, once enamored with Buck and promises for the future, now bitterly
resents the fact the presumed lesser of the two Jarrett brothers has survived
the accident. With the exception of Buck’s best friend, Joe (Fredric Lehne),
who remains fairly empathetic toward Conrad until a rift in their friendship
causes him to turn his back, the rest of Buck’s entourage are cruel in their
inability to grasp the epic reeling of sadness and envy taking place in
Conrad’s mind, his hostile antipathy at having survived, yet unable to make his
own mother understand she is not the only one to whom their earth, moon and sun
have been denied since Buck died. On the outskirts is Calvin, seemingly rock-steady
and kind, insisting Conrad see a brilliant psychologist, Dr. Tyrone C. Berger
(Judd Hirsch), to help work through his residual guilt. Conrad resists at
first, perhaps understandably, given the layman’s opinion of modern psychiatry
then as a ‘head shrinker’s game’ for the looney tune class. What is more
alarming herein is Beth’s general unwillingness to support her son’s recovering
mental health. She would prefer to forget Conrad altogether, or at least his
needs for an outsider’s help and chronically resists Calvin’s encouragement of
the sessions with Dr. Berger, and even more detrimentally pursuing a plan to
distance herself and Calvin from Conrad when, arguably, he needs them most.
Instead, Beth urges her husband to take a vacation without their son.
Eventually, Calvin begins to quietly surmise he really does not have much of a
marriage.
Perhaps he never did. Beth’s entire
existence was wrapped up in Buck, taking the place – at least in Beth’s mind –
as the man around the house. Indeed, Buck’s outgoing nature seems to have
favored the sort of woman Beth was before tragedy struck, a rather heartless
trophy around which the whole world revolved – or, at least, the country club
sect. It is therefore a blow to Beth’s conceit, particularly after Buck’s
death, she suddenly realizes this balance of power has shifted beneath her
feet. It is Conrad now who desperately needs love and support, commodities Beth
managed for Buck, yet cannot bring herself to bear without a faint sickness and
mild disgust for Conrad’s comparative weakness. A mother’s love denied is
perhaps one of the meanest misfortunes inflicted upon a child, more so as a
teenager, haunted by the inevitable insecurities of adolescence, herein
compounded by heartbreak.
Ordinary People hails from an
epoch in American film-making, fueled by low budget/character-driven drama. I
would have those times again – Redford’s movie sustained, and not by the pomp
and flash of handheld jittery camera movements or the more contemporary
affliction for Ginsu-styled editing. When Redford cuts a scene or inserts a
close-up it means something, punctuating the dramatic arc of the scene. This is
‘old school’ in the very best sense of that phrase. Better still, Redford
allows his stars to give a performance, knowing damn well they can, and,
encouraging their spontaneity with as few cuts as possible. John Bailey’s
photography captures an unsettling essence of something remiss in this
otherwise well-heeled neighborhood, laid out in resplendent autumn colors and
the warm afterglow of late-day sun sifting through dense foliage. It’s an
interesting disconnect, this outward, seemingly innocuous ‘all is right’ suburbia,
contrasted with a powder keg of deeply felt, darker scars that continue to
wound the Jarrett family.
Undeniably, Ordinary People’s
most engaging moments are fraught with bitter psychological skirmishes, between
Beth and Conrad, Beth and Calvin, or, best of all, between Conrad and Dr.
Berger, as the latter steadily peels back the scab on Conrad’s imploding and
haunted memories. These clinical sessions crackle with a spark of brilliance –
not only in performance but also in the writing and understated visual execution.
At one point, Conrad begrudgingly suggests, “Isn’t it your job to make me
feel better?” to which Berger nonchalantly replies, “Not necessarily”
and Conrad lashes out with “Well, then screw you!” Their tension is expertly
diffused by Conrad’s sudden realization of his angry absurdity. Whatever
healing will come of their time spent together it must happen from within.
Berger, mercifully becomes the diviner of Conrad’s coping with tumultuous
flashbacks. In point of fact, Berger is
Conrad’s only lifeline. The rest of Conrad’s social interactions are not
tethered to a real sense of belonging. Calvin is sympathetic, but unable to
reach his son. Beth is a lost cause. And Buck’s friends would prefer to move on
with their lives and pretend their best pal’s death never happened.
Part of Conrad’s problem is, of
course, he is desperately trying to fill a vacuum brought about by Buck’s
passing, even trying out for Buck’s swim team, though he has no zest for it,
and rather doggedly pursued by an arrogant coach (M. Emmet Walsh), who openly
admits to Conrad he lacks his brother’s physical agility to be great, and,
hitherto making the most inappropriate inquiries about the electro-shock
therapy Conrad endured at the hospital after his failed suicide attempt. At
Berger’s behest, Conrad makes awkward inroads into a relationship with Jeannine
Pratt (Elizabeth McGovern), a girl he secretly admires from choir practice. He
also clings to a friendship with Karen Aldrich (Dinah Manoff), a fragile girl
he met while the two were in hospital – she too having tried to take her own
life. This latter ‘relationship’ is, of
course, fatally flawed. How can one drowning individual save another drowning
individual? Karen is less resilient than she lets on, wishing Conrad great
success and even offering words of encouragement, all the while, as her own
life spirals out of control. Perhaps Conrad’s love for Jeannine will eventually
win out – although, the movie is highly circumspect about suggesting as much,
no romance, as it were, though quite possibly a lasting bond of friendship.
Meanwhile, on the home front,
Calvin is beginning to realize the woman he married has changed. Or is it that
Buck’s loss has merely managed to expose Beth’s failings as a human being,
Calvin suddenly seeing Beth up close for the very first time? Beth’s cruelty
toward Conrad, denying him love or at the very least understanding and
allegiance when he desperately craves it, leads to an increasing rift in Calvin
and Beth’s marriage. She cannot understand Calvin’s reticence to take a
holiday, leaving Conrad in Dr. Berger’s care and under the watchful eye of her
parents. However, Calvin is amazed Beth would even suggest a vacation at a time
when their son is so vulnerable to a relapse. Begrudgingly, Calvin acquiesces
to his wife’s demands. Perhaps, he reasons, the separation would do them all a
modicum of good. As the Christmas holidays approach, Beth suffers a crisis of
conscience pivoting on a poignantly understated moment played in the garage of
the Jarrett family home. Desperate to wrap his own mind around his son’s
emotional breakdown, Calvin attends Dr. Berger and shares some of his own
reminiscences about Buck. These are never exposed in the film, director Redford
instead cutting to Calvin’s arrival home after his session, physically and
emotionally drained and haunted by a reoccurring memory of Beth urging him to
change his dress shirt and shoes on the day of Buck’s funeral. In sharing this
recollection with his wife, Calvin also exposes each of their mindsets - his,
wildly reeling and unable to get through the day without an uncomfortable
numbness overtaking, but Beth, invested merely in how it will all look to their
friends and family.
At first, Beth resists Calvin
telling her about his memory. Increasingly, she will live to regret her
behavior, gnawing away until she can barely function without an unbearable
despondency. Later, Beth resents both her husband and son for bringing these
buried feelings to the surface. But actually, these moments illustrate at least
for the audience, if never for the character, Beth Jarrett does, indeed,
possess a heart. She is as fragile as the men in her life - an ironic
vulnerability exposed only after Beth has convinced Calvin to run off to
Houston to visit her brother, Ward (Quinn Redeker) and his wife, Audrey
(Mariclare Costello) without Conrad. Relaxing on the golf course, Calvin
receives promising news from Conrad about a breakthrough with Dr. Berger,
following news of Karen’s second and, regrettably successful, suicide. Yet,
even in sharing this with Beth she seems unwilling to be supportive, leading to
a bitter confrontation at the country club. Ward, endeavors to diffuse the
situation by insisting all anyone expects of Beth is for their family to be
happy once again. In reply, Beth finally lets down her hair, an utterly
terrifying experience as she unguardedly admits, “Ward…you tell me the
definition of happy. But first you better make sure your kids are good and safe,
that no one’s fallen off a horse or been hit by a car or drowned in that
swimming pool you’re so proud of, and then you come to me and tell me how to be
happy!”
Returning home, Calvin tells Beth
she is ‘determined’ – an unflattering quality often mistaken for strength of
character. Alas, she lacks the one essential – a woman’s heart – to be giving. “We
would have been alright if there hadn’t been a mess,” Calvin insists, “You
need everything neat and easy. When Buck died you buried all your love with him
and I don’t understand that. Whatever it was…I don’t know what we’ve been
playing at. So, I was crying. Because I don’t know if I love you anymore…and I
don’t know what I’m going to do without that.” Unable to defend her
reactions, and perhaps not even feeling the need to justify them, Beth quietly
retreats upstairs and packs. Their marriage is over. Awakening to the steely
gray of dawn, Conrad discovers Calvin despondent on the back porch. Father and
son share a heartfelt tête-à-tête and the natural order of at least their
familial bond is re-set with tearful affection.
Ordinary People is an
exceptional drama, expertly played and eloquently told by Redford, whose
passion for the material is readily apparent. Moreover, Timothy Hutton’s
pivotal turn as the shell-shocked youth, brought around to accepting his
brother’s death, despite seemingly insurmountable, crippling self-doubt and
pity, is a towering achievement. Hutton is full of adolescent angst and wounded
humility. In a performance that won the Best Supporting Actor Academy Award,
Hutton manages to convey a genuine sense of loss well beyond tear-stained
episodes and periodic emotional outbursts. His Conrad reaches to the back of
the room, and into some very dark pools of inner torment, dredging up nightmarishly
truthful emotions without ever going over the top for the theatricality of it
all. Ah well, I suppose that’s why they
call it ‘acting’. In his Oscar-nominated
performance, Judd Hirsch excels as the crudely empathetic doctor, determined to
shake his patient loose from shame with equal portions of kindness and tough
love. Ordinary People is a movie that ought to have endured a more
lasting reputation than it currently holds, particularly as it won the Best
Picture Oscar in 1981. Awards are a fairly meaningless barometer of cinema
excellence or enduring greatness. Yet, at the very least, they serve as a
perennial cultural touchstone for renewed retrospectives and analyses. In Ordinary
People’s case, its reputation has been allowed to quietly fade into
relative obscurity. But make no mistake. There is nothing ‘ordinary’ about
these people!
Paramount Home Video has finally
come around to a ‘Paramount Presents…’ Blu-ray – long overdue, though
arguably, well worth the wait. Permit us to worship an excellent anamorphic
widescreen 1.85:1 image brought to the forefront with a new 4K scan from an
original negative. Colors that were wan and anemic contrast on Paramount’s
long-suffering DVD release have been resurrected on the Blu-ray. Flesh tones offer the most noticeable improvement
here. On the DVD, they were ruddy orange during indoor scenes, and piggy pink
for the outdoor stuff. Now, flesh just looks like flesh, with exceptional
tonality for the subtler nuances and imperfections of natural skin in close-up.
Contrast is superb. Outdoor scenes sparkle with crisp autumn dew and remote
pre-Christmas frosts, beautifully photographed by cinematographer, John Bailey.
Indoor sequences contain slightly more amplified grain, as they ought. But here
too, it always appears film-like. Age-related artifacts have been entirely eradicated.
Fine details abound. Bailey’s photography was never meant to be razor sharp,
and this disc captures the absolute essence of his gentler, arguably ‘softer’
approach to shooting pictures that just appear true to life. Very good stuff
here. The 2.0 DTS mono sounds wonderful. We get two featurettes – rare, for
Paramount, shelling out for extras – even, on their ‘Paramount presents…’
line-up. First up: Swimming in the Rose Garden, starring
Timothy Hutton, who shares some memories on making the movie, followed by, Feeling
is Not Selective, an even more engrossing reflection from novelist,
Judith Guest. Aside: I wish Paramount would spend more time on these extras,
producing longer pieces that go beyond the ‘junket’ phase of arbitrary goodies.
Oh well, can’t have everything. The movie – one of Paramount’s crown jewels –
is finally fit for the asking on home video. A ‘must have’ release!
FILM RATING (out
of 5 - 5 being the best)
4.5
VIDEO/AUDIO
5+
EXTRAS
2
Comments