FATHER'S LITTLE DIVIDEND: Blu-ray (MGM, 1951) Warner Archive
Movie sequels are a tough nut to
crack. Invariably, they are all judged – unfairly, as inferior – to the
original that spawned them. There are, of course, exceptions to this rule. But
Vincente Minnelli’s Father’s Little Dividend (1951) is not among them. Despite
being considered the pioneer of the ‘legit’ movie sequel (something Hollywood
had not yet considered, though franchise film-making was a cottage
industry throughout the late 30’s thru mid-50’s), Father’s Little Dividend
is a pretty pedestrian affair. It’s a full-on reunion for the cast and director
of Father of the Bride (1950), the year before. But there are several
reasons why ‘Dividend’ does not come up to par. First, the plot.
While the arrival of a baby is generally cause for celebration, it in no way
compares to all the hoopla and chaos leading up to a young couple’s wedding
day. So, the story already sports a ‘hand-me-down’ quality. Worse, the actors are
largely going through the motions this time around, in characters they have better
established before. On occasion, returning to a role can be a gratifying
prospect for an actor. Alas, only eleven months had passed between these two
movies – not nearly enough of an absence for the afterglow to be resurrected
with fondness for their shared familiarity.
Add to this, some real-life
scandals and tragedy covered in the tabloids of their time, and MGM’s zeal to
merely recreate – rather than evolve – the magic and…well… Father’s Little
Dividend could not hope but to be considered a distant successor. Partly to
blame – Minnelli’s concentrated preoccupation on An American in Paris,
the only movie he really wanted to make in 1951, and for which he would
win Best Picture and Best Director Oscars. While sets were being constructed
for Minnelli’s grand musical, newly appointed Metro boss, Dore Schary
saddle-bagged him with Father’s Little Dividend. To be fair, Minnelli
agreed to the terms, eager to establish his reputation as a ‘company man.’ And
rather deftly too, the deed was done in a mere 28 days – a record for Minnelli,
as much as a test of his endurance to get the damn thing finished so he could
get along with sculpting the meticulous details on ‘Paris.’ Viewed
today, ‘Dividend’ remains the least Minnelli-esque of the
director’s comedies, generally lacking in his sparkle of originality and the
usual modicum of joy Minnelli brought to the first flick.
Co-stars Elizabeth Taylor and Joan
Bennett were going through their own trials by fire behind the scenes. Bennett,
playing ‘Dividend’s forthright/upright matriarch, was, in fact,
having an affair with her agent, Jennings Lang, and soon to be discovered in her
flagrante delicto by hubby/producer Walter Wanger, who promptly pumped a bullet
into Lang’s crotch. As Lang did not die from his injuries, Wanger served mere
months in a penitentiary for his ‘crime of passion.’ Bennett, however, was
chagrined. Her post-Dividend career would fizzle into a brief
series of C-grade cameos from which she ostensibly retired in 1956, only to
resurface three more times in even less distinguished fare in the intervening
decades. Meanwhile, Taylor, who had made Father of the Bride to coincide
with her real-life nuptials to hotel magnet/heir apparent, Conrad ‘Nicky’
Hilton (she wore the same bridal gown in both the first movie and at her own
wedding) was fast discovering Hilton’s chronic alcoholism and addiction to
gambling were eroding whatever chances at happiness briefly existed between
them. Rumor has it, by the time Father’s Little Dividend went before the
cameras Taylor was under much duress, even to endure several ‘beatings’ from
her husband.
Father’s Little Dividend picks up pretty
much where Father of the Bride left off. Newlywed, Kay Dunstan
(Elizabeth Taylor) announces she and hubby, Buckley (Don Taylor) are expecting.
In post-war American cinema, pregnancy – even under the covenant of marriage –
was still considered something of a taboo subject. While, both families rejoice
in the good news, Kay’s pappy, Stanley Banks’ (Spencer Tracy) middle-class
morality lingers on reflections from the recent past and his still modest and
brewing contempt at being made a grandfather by a son-in-law for whom he doesn’t
much care. Stanley recalls how his own wife, Ellie (Joan Bennett) brokered the
announcement with a veiled hint. Stanley assumed it had something to do with
Buckley's fledgling business. The groom’s parents, Doris (Billie Burke) and
Herbert (Moroni Olsen) could not be more pleased. But Stanley’s mid-life crisis
prevents him from appreciating the initial joys to be had in such a situation.
Ellie is more pragmatic. She
accepts that time has passed. She also revels in plans for a lavish baby
shower, something Stanley thinks is absurd and costly. Ellie envisions the
happy couple moving into their family home in a newly renovated suite of rooms,
but is heartbroken when the more affluent Doris and Herbert announce their plans
to build an entire wing onto their estate for the couple and their new arrival.
Both sets of parents get a big surprise however, when Buckley and Kay inform,
they have already purchased a small home on their own, not far from everyone, but
where they plan to start their lives together. While Doris is
mildly saddened by this news, Ellie dives headstrong into helping Kay
redecorate her modest abode. Kay confides in Stanley her concerns the baby may
alter the chemistry in her relationship with Buckley. But Stanley quells these
fears by reminding Kay how much he came to love Ellie even more after Kay was
born.
Very soon, an unhealthy rivalry stirs
between the Banks and Dunstons - each trying to outdo the other with gifts for
the newlyweds. This spectacle unravels one evening when both sets of in-laws
aim to have a stake in the naming of the baby. Kay is distraught and runs from
the room. Once again, Stanley proves a comfort to his daughter. But the next
day, he begins to have pause over Kay’s choice of pediatrician, Dr. Andrew
Nordell (Hayden Rorke), over his ‘modern’ methods in childbirth
and infant care. Things quiet down momentarily until Stanley receives a
late-night phone call from Buckley who believes his wife has decided to leave
him for good. Stanley, who has never much cared for Buckley, believes he will
be able to justify these feelings after talking over the reasons for Kay’s
hasty departure. Instead, Stanley discovers the depths of Buckley’s concerns
for his wife. He confides Kay thinks he may be having an affair but assures
Stanley his late nights are all work-related. Having illustrated Buckley’s fidelity
to Kay, Stanley now sets aside his residual angst for his son-in-law and
diligently works to bring the couple back together.
The arrival of the baby is
celebratory to everyone except Stanley, as the infant boy seems to have a
natural dislike of him, crying whenever Stanley comes near. When the child is
six-months old, Kay leaves him with Stanley and Ellie to follow Buckley on a
business trip. Stanley takes the boy to the park in a carriage but becomes
distracted by some other young boys playing soccer. When he returns, he
discovers the pram gone. Frantic, Stanley returns home, only to learn Kay has returned
ahead of schedule. Now, Stanley flees to the local constabulary to plead his
case. Much to Stanley’s relief, he learns the police sergeant (Richard Rober)
and other members of the force have safely ‘rescued’ the boy. They do not chide
Stanley for his forgetfulness but restore the babe to him now. For the first
time, the child does not cry when held by his grandfather. In fact, he seems
excited to see him. Relieved, Stanley returns home, keeping his brief ordeal a
secret. Sometime later, the child is christened Stanley Banks Dunstan, with a joyous
Stanley holding his grandson up with pride.
Father’s Little
Dividend rounds out the story begun in Father of the Bride with as little
distraction or articulation as possible. With a deftness for a marketable hit,
MGM lined up another bumper crop of familial woes and wonders, paying
humorist/author, Edward Streeter a mere $10,000 to regurgitate his characters
and situations. Minnelli’s deft handling of Metro’s double-scheduling resulted
in no conflicts, but an extremely tight production of only 3 short weeks in
which to finish ‘Dividend’ before investing infinitely more on An
American in Paris. Producer, Pandro S. Berman could have so easily gone
with a different director to helm this sequel. But Berman trusted in Minnelli’s
artistic verve and, also, his ability to carry over continuity from the
original movie. Buoyed by its short gestation from page to screen – barely 11
months (just enough time for a real couple to sire an heir), Father’s Little
Dividend went on to gross $3,100,000 on its relatively paltry budget of
$941,437. Likely, audiences were charmed
by the prospect of returning to familiar and beloved characters.
But Father’s Little Dividend
is one of the least artistically adventurous movies ever produced at MGM –
still considered the Cartier of American cinema in the early 1950’s. As with
its predecessor, this one opens with a monologue from Stanley Banks – a basic
recap of the first movie and a thumbnail sketch of all that will follow it.
From here, Minnelli delves deeply into his usual bacchanalia of eye-catching
intake – Kay’s baby shower substituted for the original’s wedding day plans.
Given Minnelli’s short shrift in visual finesse, Dividend becomes
rather slavishly embroiled to duplicate the success of its forebear, alas,
without ever achieving any lasting distinction on its own. Minnelli hits his
targets like a skilled marksman, yet with a certain ennui creeping in –
acknowledgement, perhaps, that everything about Dividend is old
news recycled for sheer publicity. And invariably, none of this retread
contains the same zing as before.
As, predictably, we are destined to
conclude on a high note, every moment wedged between the titles and final fade-out
becomes a foregone conclusion. The actors assembled, as finely wrought in their
respective craft, are generally sleepwalking through these performances. Taylor
is less doe-eyed here, perhaps as the bloom of her first-time romance with
Nicky Hilton has knocked her off her tuffet. So, the lack of spark between her
and co-star, Don Taylor – present, though cleverly masked in Father of the
Bride (there was too much going on in that movie to care whether the bride
and groom were a love match), now seems utterly transparent and void of the
necessary sentiment to make it click as it ought. One can no more imagine Kay
wed to a milquetoast like Buckley Dunston than Elizabeth Taylor sticking it out
with a guy who became violent after getting drunk. By the time Dividend
streeted at Radio City in April, 1951, Taylor was already 3½ months divorced
from Hilton after only 205 days of marriage!
Void of a romantic angle, the best
scenes in Father’s Little Dividend mark exchanges between father and
daughter. Elizabeth Taylor has found her subtler footing, sharing the screen
with one of cinema’s truly great actors – Spencer Tracy. Herein, she matches Tracy’s
inflection as one of the most believable father/daughter teams in movie
history. If only Father’s Little Dividend had had more such tender
moments to recommend it. Alas, the rest just seems like filler to get us to the
end. And Minnelli, realizing what a gemstone he has in his two stars appearing
together in a single shot, takes a much-needed step back to allow his camera,
simply to exist in the same space, basking in Tracy and Taylor’s joyful
reminiscences, revealed and remedied by the tender hand of fate in just being
‘daddy’s little girl.’ For a brief wrinkle, there were talks of turning Father
of the Bride into a franchise, with plans for a ‘part three’. Doubtless,
Dore Schary and MGM would have approved – given the lucrative nature of the
first two pictures. But Joan Bennett’s marital scandal and the fallout wrought
from it put a distinct period in her consideration to reprise the role of the
demure Ellie. And Minnelli, though proud of having balanced his efforts between
two top-tier hits for the studio in 1951, was decidedly finished with visiting
this well. As far as Minnelli was concerned, the bloom was off the rose. Best
to leave well enough alone.
For decades, Father’s Little Dividend
has been subjected to some truly woeful home video incarnations, thanks to an
oversight in rights renewals in the mid-1970’s that caused it to officially
fall out of MGM’s jurisdiction and into the hands of bootleggers aplenty. Well,
you can forget all of those. Because the Warner Archive (WAC) has secured the
rights and, with an original camera negative to crib from, their new 4K scan,
dumped to 1080p Blu, is a marvel well worth your coin. The gray scale exhibits
a refinement not seen since its theatrical run. Blacks are rich and deep.
Whites, clean and vibrant. Fine detail abounds. Contrast is bang-on excellent.
A light smattering of film grain looks indigenous to its source. Truly, this
one is a revelation. And about time too. Now, if WAC could only concentrate on
getting ownership of Meet John Doe, State of the Union, Royal Wedding, Till
The Clouds Roll By, This is The Army and Beyond the Forrest, we’d
really have pause to rejoice. But I digress. The 2.0 DTS mono on Dividend
sounds appealing, with crisp dialogue. Extras are limited to a trailer and two
vintage Tom & Jerry cartoons. Bottom line: Father’s Little
Dividend is a ripple in Vincente Minnelli’s career. The movie does
not rate nearly as highly as this remastered new-to-Blu. Judge and buy
accordingly.
FILM RATING (out
of 5 – 5 being the best)
2
VIDEO/AUDIO
5
EXTRAS
1
Comments