STAR! (2oth Century-Fox, 1968) Fox Home Video
In honor of the
Walt Disney Corporation’s most recent - and much appreciated - public announcement that, after decades
of sitting on their own goldmine of Uncle Walt’s live-action film legacy, as
well as to have since annexed the asset management catalog of the now-defunct
2oth Century-Fox (inexplicably rechristened 2oth Century Studios by Disney
Inc.), Walt’s successors have reached a distribution deal with Grover Crisp and
Sony Home Entertainment (whose home video model is decidedly more progressive
and aggressive), we at Nix Pix have decided to revisit several Fox catalog
releases, decidedly, that require some immediate love and attention.
Sixteen years
after the death of Broadway's beloved Gertrude Lawrence, 2oth Century-Fox
afforded the ‘late great’ a lavish biopic from the award-winning team
responsible for catapulting Julie Andrews to super-stardom in The Sound of
Music (1965). Billed as “the love affair of the century - between a
woman, and the world”, Robert Wise’s Star! (1968) is flashy, often
engrossing, and impeccably crafted. It was never meant to be a literal
chronology of the life and times of Gertrude Lawrence. That it came at the end
of the sixties’ verve for big and bloated road show musical entertainments,
and, utterly failed to catch even the tail fires of this popular zeitgeist, is
a miscalculation in timing only. And yet, it remains the one particular from
which the film’s reputation continues to suffer. Star! was a colossal
flop at a particular epoch when the studio could scarcely afford another. In a
good many books written about the history of the Hollywood musical, Star!
is cruelly singled out as one of three musicals to sound the death knell; the
other two being Doctor Doolittle and Hello Dolly! (1969).
Ironically, all three came from Fox, still riding high on the ether of The
Sound of Music. And yet, none of the
aforementioned is quite the disaster – artistically speaking – that it’s latter-day
reputation would suggest. In fact, Dolly!, Doolittle and Star!
are all built like tanks from another bygone era; given over to unadulterated
showmanship and razzamatazz with individual merits. While Dolly! and
Doolittle have since endeared themselves to the public, Star!’s legacy
as a bona fide classic remains in question.
After it became
quite clear Star! had laid an egg, a panicked brain trust at Fox hastily
withdrew it from circulation, unceremoniously hacking into Wise’s careful
construction without his consent or input, leaving 26-minutes on the cutting
room floor. Star! was then reissued under a different title; ‘Those
Were The Happy Days’. Clearly - not.
And yet, retrospectively, one can clearly see this forest for its trees.
Star! is a great musical – undoubtedly ill-timed, but supremely
satisfying as a free-flowing travelogue through the finer points that
effectively made-up Gertrude Lawrence’s saucy and luminescent backstage persona.
Until Star! the Teflon-coated persona of Gertie Lawrence had been hermetically
preserved in two gushing, if highly sanitized accolades. The first was penned
by Lawrence herself in 1945. But the other became a postmortem love-in, written
by her second husband, Max Lamb. In reading either, Robert Wise was likely
dumbstruck to reconcile the grand dame with this flesh and blood creature. Lawrence’s
bios are, in fact, very one-dimensional, a reminder, perhaps, of Winston
Churchill’s rather glib retort to a reporter, who once asked if his pugnaciousness
concerned how he would be judged by history. To this, Churchill replied, “Most
fairly, for I intend to write it.”
And yet, ‘Gertie’
Lawrence’s reputation as a formidable lady of the theater had endured, if for
nothing else, then 1941’s Lady in the Dark, regarded by many as the
epitome of chic sophistication, and, for which Lawrence was hailed “a
goddess” in the New York Times. Alas, Lawrence was also human, and, as
such, mortally flawed by certain inalienable foibles that, far from debasing
her professional standing, only added compelling back story to the intangible
appeal of her incandescent stage presence. “I talked with a lot of people
who knew her,” producer, Saul Chaplin reflected, “…and invariably they
all had the same thing to say about her. She couldn’t act, sing or dance…but
she was marvelous!” Wise, Chaplin
and a small army of researchers endeavored to do their homework on Gertrude
Lawrence. As such, Star! is neither a hatchet job, in the ‘Mommie
Dearest’ vein, nor a fluffy and furtive obfuscation of the harsher
realities that plagued Lawrence’s private life. While some episodes, like
Lawrence’s mid-career discovery she had bankrupted herself on a hedonist lifestyle,
are dealt short shrift with a modicum of good humor, other bits, like Gertie’s strained
relationship with her daughter, Pamela Howley (Jenny Agutter, in the film) are
lent more than a tarnished hint of sadness genuine to life, if hardly explorative
of the complete picture gleaned from the totality of that life.
And since Star!
is, above all else, a musical – there are numbers and songs, and songs and
numbers aplenty to go around. Eighteen tracks adorn this road show; some, like ‘The
Saga of Jenny’ given to lavish appointment, while others, ‘Dear Little
Boy’ in particular, are performed with a simple, yet refined magnetic perseverance
for reading something more into the lyric by Julie Andrews (who trills and
thrills in all but three), serving as a musical bridge, carrying the audience
from scene to scene or, in some cases, advancing the narrative timeline by
several years. Virtually, none adhere to the esthetics of their original stage-bound
performance. And this is, arguably, all to the good, as the precepts of a late-sixties’
musical road show compliment the theatrics in each number in unexpected ways.
It is, in fact, remarkable how well the psychedelic sixties here seamlessly
meld with melodies, in some cases, written a full forty years before it. The three ditties left unsung by Andrews are
expertly executed addendums to establish the musical milieu into which Lawrence’s
rising star has been dropped. ‘In My Garden of Joy’ outlines Gertie’s
desperation to break free of the chorus, playing the wide-eyed fool scattering
rose petals amidst a pack of disgruntled chorines whom she has just upstaged in
the devilishly daffy, ‘Oh, It’s A Lovely War.’ This was preceded by our
introduction to Noel Coward (played with effortless and undeniably brilliance
by, Coward’s godson, Daniel Massey), slyly warbling the Coward zinger, ‘Forbidden
Fruit’. Finally, there is Garrett Lewis as Britain’s dashing and dapper,
Jack Buchanan, emoting ‘N’ Everything’ – a glossily staged solo into
which Andrew’s determined minx again finds that rare opportunity to distinguish
herself from the backup dancers.
Noel Coward,
then still very much alive, and, with his reputation as lionized as Gertie’s,
thought Star! a splendid homage to endear her to a new generation.
Without reservation, Coward granted producers access to his likeness and back
catalog to dispose of at their artistic liberties. One down. One to go. Saul
Chaplin had also hoped to convince Beatrice Lillie, arguably Lawrence’s best
friend (with whom she is rumored to have had a lesbian relationship) to partake
of the exercise. Alas, Lillie became exacting and impractical in her demands – aspiring
to play herself in the movie. Unable to convince Lillie otherwise, Chaplin’s instead
instructed screenwriter, William Fairchild to write her out entirely. Star!
gets a lot of criticism today for such liberal amendments to Gertie’s personal
history. The movie does, in fact, skirt past many finer points in Lawrence’s
lore, as well as ignoring her greatest contribution to the stage – playing Anna
Leonowens in Rodgers and Hammerstein’s The King and I. And yet,
one can sincerely forgive William Fairchild such absences, especially since, in
a good many cases, only ‘names’ have been changed (to protect the ‘innocent’).
As real life is oft imperfect and messy, Fairchild also telescopes Gertie’s
many love affairs into an amalgam of four fictional suitors to satisfy the
constraints of time. Thus, Star! strives for a tidier account of ‘the
truth’. Fairchild’s achievement here is both large-scale and all-encompassing.
He gets the big picture right, even if the details are occasionally sketchy
and/or muddled beyond recognition.
The painstaking
research performed by Robert Wise and his associates goes beyond this bottom
line, culling and condensing information gleaned from numerous first-hand interviews
with the people who once knew Gertrude Lawrence – in some cases, through her least
flattering moments. From these eyewitness accounts, it became rather apparent
there were at least two sides to Lawrence, for which – biographically thus far
– either out of genuine reverence or an even greater anxiety to avoid a
defamation of character lawsuit – one had been quietly swept under the rug.
Initially, Wise and Chaplin planned an animated sequence to express the duality
in Gertie’s personality, a sort of public charade vs. private woman bit of camp,
counterbalanced by a running farcical commentary by Julie Andrews. Thankfully,
this approach was abandoned early on. Instead, Fairchild substitutes a
black-and-white newsreel prologue, serving as our segue between ‘history’,
‘truth’ and fiction. Intermittently thereafter, more pseudo-news reel footage surfaces
to bridge the passage of the years. For concision, as well as for legal
reasons, Fairchild's screenplay rechristens, combines and/or excludes some of
the real people constituting Lawrence’s sphere of influence. To fill in for
Beatrice Lillie’s glaring omission, Fairchild concocted, Billie Carleton
(Lynley Laurence). Fairchild made
Lawrence’s first husband - dance director, Francis Gordon-Howley (renamed Jack
Roper and played effectively by John Collin) roughly the same age as Gertie,
when in reality Howley was a solid twenty-years her senior. Lawrence’s affair
with Capt. Philip Astley was also reworked; the character now renamed Sir
Anthony Spencer (Michael Craig), while Gertie’s engagement to Wall Street
banker, Bert Taylor was entirely overlooked. Instead, the movie’s Gertie
briefly tolerates a jealous love affair with a fictional stockbroker, Charles
Fraser (Robert Reed) before moving on to playhouse producer, Richard Aldrich
(Richard Crenna).
Even before a
single frame had been exposed, Star! was shaping up to be an
extravaganza; what with Boris Leven’s meticulous recreations of London’s West
End and Donald Brooks’ ravishing array of vintage costumes. There are 3,040 in
all, some 125 changes for Andrews alone. As these exquisite outfits were
subsidized by the Western Costume Company, they officially became their
property after production wrapped and were loaned out for many years thereafter
before finally being auctioned off in the late 1970’s. To choreograph, Wise and
Chaplin turned to veteran, Michael Kidd who elected to ‘push’ Julie Andrews
beyond her comfort zone. Their collaborative efforts produce two irrefutable
stand outs: ‘Burlington Bertie from Bow’ and the mammoth finale, built
around ‘The Saga of Jenny’ - that oft resurrected and much-admired Kurt
Weill/Ira Gershwin melody from Lady in the Dark. ‘Burlington Bertie’
marks Lawrence’s breakout for famed impresario, AndrĂ© Charlot (Alan
Oppenheimer) - her nearly 3-month pregnancy camouflaged in hobo’s garb. Andrews
is caustically magnificent as the snobbish vagrant who, with noblesse oblige,
refuses to ‘have a banana with Lady Diana’ and has the effrontery to ‘swank
it’ using Rothchild’s ‘mail for a blanket’; all the while thinking
the hoi poloi damn fools. It is an enchanting bit of nostalgia excised with
Andrews’ inimitable affinity for those early, yet even by 1968, all but
forgotten music hall years.
By contrast, ‘The
Saga of Jenny’ is a flamboyantly mounted super-colossus, perhaps owing a
tad too much to vintage sixties’ glam-bam than the regal decadence of the
original Lawrence show. Andrews descends on a whirling swing in her navy blue
and silver sequined pants suit, thereafter cavorting with an assortment of
colorfully-attired circus acrobats, jugglers, midgets and clowns. Bounced from
buttocks to pelvis, Andrews’ saucy delivery evokes a deliciously stylized
cynicism as she points to the foibles of a fictional social climber who, among
her other misfires, lit the candles but tossed the taper away, only to become
an orphan on Christmas Day; later, to get herself all dolled up in her satin
and furs, to land herself a husband, though he wasn’t hers; whose searing white
hot memoirs inspired wives to shoot their husbands in some thirty-three states,
and, finally, succumbing to too much gin and rum and destiny at the age of
seventy-six. The Saga of Jenny is
a phenomenon unto itself, a kitschy sequence apart from virtually everything
gone before it. For this sequence, Wise’s maneuvers his camera beyond the
proscenium, inviting the cinematic audience to partake of its absurdly garish
spectacle in close-up. Contrariwise, the rest of the songs were deliberately shot
from a distance to mark the proscenium as filmed stagecraft. It is to Wise’s
credit, and moreover, a hallmark of his decades of expertise, none of these
stage-bound vignettes ever winds up becoming static or dull. Some, like ‘Someone
to Watch Over Me’ are expertly executed as transitional pieces of
self-reflection, with Andrews, voice throbbing to be loved, emoting beyond the
power of the lyrics.
Absurdly
budgeted at six million, Star! likely seemed guaranteed box office. How
could it miss? In retrospect, far too easily. For starters, the movie
musical had already passed its prime by 1968, thanks, in part, to a slew of
ill-conceived, over-produced stage-to-screen clunkers to have soured the public
on the genre as a whole. The demise of the musical was also hastened by the collapse
of the studios once carefully maintained star system, and, by the influx of
newly arrived artisans fresh from film school, weaned on the golden era, though
eager to replace its imprint with their own. So too, were audiences increasingly
turning away from the artifice of fantasy, seeking realism in lieu of
spectacle. What had sold tickets a scant four years earlier, now drew jeers if,
in fact, the audience was attending at all. Worse, critics had become jaded by
this era’s high-priced fluff, the treacle too sticky, the staging failing to
impress. Finally, unlike some of the more profitable efforts to arrive at the
outset of the decade leading into its core years, (West Side Story,
1960; The Music Man, 1962, and, My Fair Lady, 1964, among them), Star!
was not a Broadway-to-Hollywood hybrid.
Indeed, it owed
much to the old MGM glamor days of the mid-1940’s when homegrown product built
upon an ensconced studio style sold the bill affair with confidence to an
audience. As such, Star! had no pre-sold title to be trumpeted by the
marketing department. No precedence either, except among an aging demographic
still able to recall Gertie Lawrence in her prime. The trick in the exercise
therefore rested with Julie Andrews’ marquee-drawing power. Gertrude Lawrence
had been a legend in her own time. Perhaps owing to that daunting iconography,
Andrews had initially turned down a previous offer to portray her in the
movies. But now, Andrews was, herself, ‘a star’ - pert and plucky, ‘practically
perfect’ and squeaky-clean, expertly fitted into novice nuns and nannies on
the screen. In some ways, it is this persona inculcated in The Sound of
Music and Mary Poppins (1964) that did much to damper her reception with
the public in Star! Despite Andrews ability to illustrate she was more
than a fresh-faced chanteuse (her non-singing/dramatic turn in 1964’s The
Americanization of Emily is superb) audiences impressions of what it meant
to be Julie Andrews on the screen were diametrically at odds with Lawrence’s
razor-backed ‘uber-wit’ and ultra-chic sophistication.
Yet, in Robert
Wise, Andrews felt secure. Moreover, a mutual admiration had been built up
between Wise, Chaplin and Andrews during their collaboration on The Sound of
Music, ensuring integrity, class and tact as the order of the day on Star!,
an ‘A-list’ production to adorn and compliment two great ladies. Besides,
Andrews still owed Fox a movie. While Richard Zanuck remained mildly concerned
about the declining popularity of big-budgeted Hollywood musicals, he
nevertheless felt certain that with Andrews at its helm, Star! could be
an even greater triumph for the studio. Tragically, the picture proved the exception
rather than the rule. Star! was a titanic misfire, eviscerated by the
critics and all but ignored by audiences. Removed from all its hype, Star!
today, clearly has more virtues than vices to recommend it. In its truncated 120-mins. rechristened cut, Star!
is undeniably an unforgivable hodgepodge. At 150-mins., the picture acquires a
moody magnificence, offering faintly distinct glimmers of being something greater
than the sum of its parts, especially as Robert Wise never allows the show’s
musical program to become arbitrarily episodic. However, reinstated to its
original 170-min. road show length, Star! is unequivocally a masterpiece
– perhaps, not on the same level of instantly identifiable iconography as
Wise’s The Sound of Music, yet still teeming in the director’s
inimitable ingenuity and copious amounts of richly satisfying score and drama.
Julie Andrews
and Daniel Massey are sublimely cast as the Ying and Yang - Gertie and Noel
respectively. Andrews wisely interprets Gertrude Lawrence on her own terms
rather than attempting a caricature of the star’s well-documented behaviors and
mannerisms. And Andrews is undeniably in very fine voice – much finer, in fact,
than Lawrence ever was in life. Massey,
on the other hand, is an exquisite Noël Coward, uncannily comfortable in the
effete playwright's skin, perhaps in no small way because he was meticulously
coached by Coward to also refrain from camp. To listen to Massey’s incandescent,
if slightly sordid, ‘Forbidden Fruit’ (a ditty about man’s perilous
desire to possess that which, quite frankly he should not, whether peaches atop
the highest bow or an already married Mrs. Brown) is to give the erudite and as
saucy Coward his considerable due. And the chemistry between Massey and Andrews
in their dramatic and comedic sparing offers a veritable feast of delicious
moments, some more fast and loose that others with the specifics of Gertie’s
life and lovers. While no one could – or rather, should – confuse William Fairchild’s
reflections as the definitive ‘last’ word on Gertrude Lawrence, his narrative
does retain just enough verisimilitude to be believed on its own terms and
conditions as a big and bouncy biopic. With all of its excised footage
reinstated Star! eloquently moves through its period recreations,
intelligently scripted and impeccably hand-crafted.
Star! sings its way
into our hearts as only Julie Andrews in her prime could. Perhaps, one of the
reasons it so completely failed to be discovered in 1968 has to do with Wise’s
deliberate studio-bound approach to the material. By 1968, most movie genres, musicals
included, had left the confines of the back lot, the ‘opening up’ of stagecraft
lending an air of quaintness and, perhaps, formaldehyde to the reputation of
musicals made only a decade earlier. In this regard, Star! very much
plays like a musical conceived for the 1940's screen. Its stylized sets are
obvious. Its numbers are staged almost exclusively as works of stagecraft –
framed by walls, painted backdrops or curtains. This adheres to a certain
carefully curated nostalgia for those music hall and Broadway revues. But it also suggests an artificial world
almost entirely left in the rearview of cinema history by the time Star!
went before the cameras. So, Star! was undeniably not what audiences
wanted to see in 1968. A shame too, because Fairchild’s screenplay is a very
rich tapestry, gingerly imbued with an almost lyrical fondness for another time,
and, more than a modicum of glib cynicism for ‘then’ contemporary society, exercised
in the picture’s upper-class snobbery and lowborn slum prudery with
tongue-in-cheek waggishness and spellbinding professionalism.
Star! begins in
earnest with a faux ‘main title’ sequence shot in sepia, framed in the
traditional Academy aspect ratio of 1:33.1. Wise had to get permission from
2oth Century-Fox to use their pre-Cinemascope logo, the ‘credits’ paying homage
to Gertrude Lawrence with vintage photographs of the star as a baby and little
girl. These snapshots segue into a montage of vintage newsreels cobbled
together with new footage shot for the film, but appropriately distressed to
provide seamless connective tissue about Gertie's childhood and early teenage
years. When the newsreel introduces Gertie’s father, Arthur (Bruce Forsyth) we
hear a note of protest off-camera and are startled by the suddenly glamorous
appearance of Gertrude Lawrence (Julie Andrews) rising from her chair in
sumptuous color by DeLuxe, the screen expanded to its large gauge aspect ratio.
We are in a projection room. Gertie, with movie shorts producer, Jerry Paul
(Damian London) is about to set the record straight. It wasn’t all hearts and
flowers, Gertie explains. Her dad was a bumbling rapscallion who left her mum
when Gertie was still a child, and whose portly paramour, Rose (Beryl Reid) was
to costar in their latest of many forgettable music halls engagements in
London.
We regress –
this time, into a DeLuxe-colored/Panavision daydream. Gertie, now a teen,
salvages their busker’s routine with a brash intervention, winning the
audience’s respect after Arthur is pelted with tomatoes. Backstage, Arthur is
incensed – perhaps, more wounded pride than anything else – even as he
announces he and Rose are leaving for a tour of South Africa in the morning.
Once again, Gertrude is left to fend for herself. Landing a minor part in an
ensemble all-girl's act, Gertie attempts to distinguish herself – at first,
quite by accident, but later, deliberate grandstanding – her decision to
upstage the act, infuriating the others. Gertie's next stab at stardom is as
flawed. She falls through a stage trap door, embedding a mattress coil in her
backside while crashing auditions for London impresario, Andre Charlot. Her
accidental 'entrance' reunites Gertie with childhood pal, Noel Coward and also
convinces Charlot to cast her in the chorus. Gertie, however, fancies herself a
star. So, during a performance with matinee idol, Jack Buchanan (Garrett Lewis)
she upstages the other chorines with a farewell bell kick - a move that utterly
infuriates Charlot, who reiterates he “does not employ unprofessional
amateurs!”
Gertie, who
never holds anything back, is about to reply in kind. She is instead encouraged
by stage manager, Jack Roper to hold her tongue. Over drinks at a local pub,
Roper promises Gertie her moment in the spotlight, when all he really wants is
a way into her bed. Flattery can get him almost anywhere – and in short order,
the two are married. But Roper's plan to hasten Gertie's retirement by getting
her pregnant creates a rift in their marriage, along with Roper’s alcoholic
binges and the birth of their daughter, Pamela (Jenny Agutter). So, Gertie and
Jack divorce. Meanwhile, Noel initiates an awkward ‘cute meet’ between Gertie
and dashing guardsman, Sir Anthony Spencer (Michael Craig). While Tony is quite
smitten with Gertie from the beginning, it takes some time for her to warm to
him. Spencer is the patient sort, and arguably the right man for our
temperamental star. The two eventually become lovers. Regrettably, Tony’s debut of Gertie in polite
society is an ill fit. While she aspires
to these finer fashions and ideals, Gertie is undeniably a very rough diamond.
After learning she has skipped out on a performance for a date with Tony,
Charlot sacks Gertie from his new musical revue. To make ends meet during this
fallow period, Gertie becomes a fashion model, painfully bored by the work.
Once again, Noel - whose star has been steadily on the ascendance - comes to
Gertie's rescue, coaxing Charlot to take her back for his new show.
At this
juncture, the movie’s narrative becomes slightly jumbled, skipping through a
series of vignettes covering six years in a mere four-and-a-half minutes.
Charlot takes his revue to America where it is a big hit and Gertie an even
bigger one. In New York, she meets Wall Street banker, Ben Mitchell (Anthony
Eisley) and then Charles Fraser (Robert Reed), a somewhat pretentious madcap.
Both men relentlessly pursue her. Temporarily smitten, Gertie has a tryst with
each. But these passing fancies grow dim, especially after Tony arrives at
Gertie’s ultra-chic New York penthouse on the eve of a lavish Roman toga party
at which Gertie elects to stand out from the crowd by going as Madame de
Pompadour. Despite the fact she obviously prefers Tony to either of the new men
in her life, Gertie sends all of them away in the end. Forlorn after everyone
except Noel has gone home, Gertie is encouraged to send for Tony. He will
come back. She need only ask. But it’s no use. Gertie is already married…as
Noel pointed out earlier – to her career. The reason for Gertie’s bittersweet
rejection of Tony is never entirely explained. Herein, Wise inserts an
intermission instead, after which we move into the next phase of Gertie’s life
- her very strained mother/daughter relationship with Pamela, now a teenager.
Gertie has elected to take Pamela on a summer holiday off the coast of France,
along with her social secretary, Dorothy (Mathilda Calnan). Although a mutual
longing to bond persists, neither Gertie nor Pamela is capable of making the
necessary move to reach out. Pamela instead goes home to England to finish her
schooling. Sensing how unfulfilled and lonely Gertie is once again, Noel hastens
her return to the stage in Charlot's new revue. Nothing has changed. Gertie is
an even bigger hit. However, almost immediately, she is charged with tax
evasion - a gross mismanagement of her assets by Dorothy, leaving Gertie
horrendously in debt. To repay what she owes, Gertie plunges headstrong into a
breakneck workload, performing on the stage, appearing in nightclubs and dance
halls until she suffers a complete physical breakdown.
Hospitalized and
disheartened, Gertie takes Noel's suggestion to go to America for an extended
respite. While performing in Noel’s Private Lives, Gertie meets
producer, Richard Aldrich (Richard Crenna) who operates a small playhouse on
Long Island. The romance between them is tempestuous, fueled by a mutual
disdain that ironically grows into hot-blooded lust. Aldrich produces 'Lady
In The Dark' - Gertie's most ambitious and celebrated show. He also manages
to win Gertie’s heart. Curiously, Star! never ventures beyond this
moment of bliss – omitting what is arguably Lawrence’s most celebrated
stagecraft - The King and I. Instead, after performing The Saga of
Jenny, we end on another flashback – or rather, flash-forward, to the
projection room where our story began. Gertie reminisces “Well, that’s the
way it was,” the inference, of course, being her relationship with Aldrich
has not survived. Presumably, to satisfy the conventions of the traditional
‘all’s well that ends well’ in Hollywood musicals, Wise does not end his movie
here. Instead, we regress to the day of Gertie’s wedding to Aldrich, the couple
inundated by well-wishers pitching rice. Aldrich and Gertie hurry into the
backseat of a waiting chauffeur-driven car. She utters the identical – and
prophetic - words once said to Jack Roper, “I shouldn’t have married you.”
However, unlike Roper – who fluffed off this confession with laughter, Aldrich
casually tells Gertie if she would prefer, they can drive straight to the
courthouse and have their marriage annulled. This, of course, incurs Gertie’s
ire. She flies into one of her trademark tirades, leaving Aldrich mildly amused
– the couple’s car driving off on route to their countryside honeymoon for a
‘life together’ that we already know is doomed to fail.
In this
penultimate moment of farewell, Star! defines itself as a very elaborate
undertaking. Its imperfect subject matter, the incapacity of the real Gertrude
Lawrence’s tortured need to be loved, is brilliantly reconstituted as a big and
glossy Hollywood musical. Fairchild’s exposition and Wise’s direction conspire
on a first-rate entertainment. And for
much of its runtime, Star! is a genuine treat to behold, sustained by this
delicate balance between intelligent introspection, witty humor and wholly
concocted sentiment; all of it, slickly packaged into one handsomely mounted
super production with class. Julie Andrews achieves the stature of another
great lady without devolving into lampoon or mimicry. Her Gertie Lawrence is nothing short of a
revelation. The tartness of the diva is somehow reconciled with Andrews’ pluckier
onscreen persona. Star! plays far
better minus our expectations for Robert Wise to deliver another ‘Sound
of Music’. It really is an ‘apples to pomegranates’ comparison
as Star! is a far more introspective and subtler critique of the
garrulous Gertie. Right at the outset, Andrews’ mordant maven orders producer,
Jerry Paul not to analyze her too closely - a bit of foreshadowing on Wise’s
part as to where the rest of his movie is headed. For Star! is as much a
critique of the intangibles that made Gertrude Lawrence unique as it typifies a
certain derivative in highly stylized movie-making since to have gone the way
of the dodo.
Viewed today, Star!
plays like the beloved snapshot gleaned from two bygone eras; perhaps, the only
‘living’ record to remind us of its’ musical hall vintage legend. Star!
also comes with an interesting footnote. In 1971, a fire inside the Fox’s film
vaults was thought to have destroyed the only surviving negatives of the
complete roadshow. For decades
thereafter, Star! was thought to be a lost film, merely referenced as a
flop. Time, however, does very strange things to art – both real and ‘reel’ –
and in 1994, the full 175-minute cut miraculously resurfaced in Britain – from
elements virtually preserved for having lain dormant in storage during the
intervening decades. After considerable coaxing from Saul Chaplin and Robert
Wise, Fox agreed to a limited theatrical reissue of Star! in North
America where it suddenly garnered notoriety and praise from the critics – some
of who had poo-pooed it as a disastrous misfire back in 1968. Released to home
video on LaserDisc later that same year, the roadshow edition of Star!
proved to be a very popular seller, later resurrected on DVD in 1999. Since
then, it has remained a genuine pity Star! has not found its way to
Blu-ray. Star! originally contained an overture, intermission/entr'acte
and exit music. Regrettably, only the overture survives on Fox’s DVD. The
LaserDisc of Star! also properly framed the Panavision image in its
original 2:20.1 aspect ratio. The DVD exhibits a slightly cropped image,
albeit, one superior in its color rendering, with improved contrast to boot.
One other bit of
controversy dogs the DVD. The newsreel footage interpolated throughout the
movie was originally photographed in B&W and framed in 1.33.1. While the
DVD retains the proper aspect ratio for these segments, it has inexplicably
tinted these monochromatic inserts to sepia – an oversight hopefully corrected
if we ever get a remastering of Star! on Blu-ray. The image harvest on Star!
on DVD has decidedly dated. Colors are slightly faded, belying the meticulous efforts
of cinematographer, Ernest Laszlo. Regrettably, no digital clean-up has been
applied. Age-related artifacts are everywhere, and occasionally, quite
distracting. Star!'s original six-track stereo soundtrack has also been
distilled into a slightly strident 5.1 Dolby Digital. The main benefit here is,
of course, to hear Julie Andrews' sing in stereo for the first time since the
movie's debut. But Star! also deliberately incorporates several mono
recordings to appropriately date the supposed vintage flashbacks. These have
been faithfully reproduced in mono. Back
in 2000, Fox licensed the complete score to Star! on a 2-disc CD set –
all of the tracks remastered in stereo as originally recorded, though
regrettably, due to a rights issue, some only existing in their truncated
‘album cut’. That CD is, as begrudgingly, out of print today. The hope is that
if Star! ever does come to Blu-ray, its soundtrack will be remastered to
include as an isolated stereo score for our listening enjoyment.
Finally, Star!
on DVD is a flipper disc. Side A contains the 175-minute road show cut
with a very insightful audio commentary from Robert Wise. Side B,
contains an original 1968 featurette and a vintage short from 1994 entitled ‘Silver
Star’ shot for the reissue reunion party and featuring Robert Wise, Saul
Chaplin, Julie Andrews and Richard Crenna. There is also a ‘stills’ galleries.
But this is regrettably a hodgepodge of overlapping images – some so
unflattering that Julie Andrews ought to have insisted the originals be burned.
There are also extensive liner notes on the making of the film to toggle
through with remote access. Bottom line: Star!’s absence from public
view since 1994 remains a genuine mystery. It is a great musical – one,
expertly handled with finely wrought performances and an outstanding cavalcade
of song integrated into its dramatic elements. It may not be what audiences
expected to see in 1968, but viewed today, Star! most assuredly take its
rightful place among the top-tiered efforts of the 1960’s. While we wait in
hope of an eventual Blu-ray, the DVD comes recommended – for content, at least.
FILM RATING (out
of 5 - 5 being the best)
4.5
VIDEO/AUDIO
3
EXTRAS
2.5
Comments