FRANKENSTEIN: Blu-ray (Universal 1931) Universal Home Video
The ‘other’
great monster in Universal’s pantheon of midnight terrors is undeniably James
Whale’s Frankenstein (1931); the
extraordinary reconstitution of Mary Shelley’s immortal Gothic freak show into
a weirdly timeless middle-European landscape, populated by some genuinely suspicious
pseudo-folklore. In re-conceptualizing the novel for the modern screen, Whale
was to throw out just about everything that made the novel famous, except the
threadbare concept of a scientist probing the secrets of life and death by
stitching together cadavers to ‘make’ a monster. The overwhelming box office
success of Dracula had afforded
Carle Laemmle Jr. the ability to delve into even more lavish recreations of
Gothic horror for this second trip to the well. Yet, the world manifested in
Charles D. Hall’s lavish production design is a very strange amalgam of 18th
century traditions married to decidedly 20th century technologies and
scientific precepts. There’s no way of getting around it. The movie’s visual
design, superbly photographed by cinematographers Arthur Edeson and Paul Ivano,
is perhaps an even more curious oddity than the monster, bringing together the
stylistic elements of Gothic horror and German Expressionism.
In retrospect
Shelley’s novel seems rife for exploitation; the year 1931 at a very strange
crossroads between the scientific advancements taken hold since the 1823
publication of Shelley’s novel and the Nov. 1918 armistice ending WWI. Indeed,
life-saving plastic surgeries allowed horrifically wounded soldiers from the
battlefield to re-enter society as the commonplace disfigured amongst the
general populace. Such ‘miracles’ had probed the boundaries of
what was possible in this ‘modern age’, the so-called restoration of the
mutilated giving rise to the public’s fascination with tales of the fantastic. Frankenstein, the novel, is very much a
story about man’s driven desire to improve and even surpass God’s work. The
exercise is, of course, not without its repercussions as the novel’s eccentric
scientist, Dr. Victor Frankenstein is to shortly discover. In the movie, the
doctor’s first name is inexplicably changed to Henry, while the competing love
interest played by John Boles is given the name Victor. Go figure. We won’t
even try.
As Universal
had done with Bram Stoker’s blood-sucker, Dracula,
virtually all of Shelley’s novel – except its threadbare plot points – was
discarded in favor of an original screenplay based on Peggy Webling and John
Balderston’s Broadway adaptation, rewritten by Francis Edward Faragoh, Garrett
Fort and an unaccredited Robert Florey and John Russell. Shelley’s novel is very circumspect in its
details about the resurrection of the monster; her description entirely
re-envisioned by makeup artist, Jack Pierce who used a frightful concoction of
noxious spirit gum, cotton, collodion and green greasepaint to build up layers
of dense bone and rotting flesh, evolving the look through trial and error.
Boris Karloff spent hours in Pierce’s makeup chair, enduring the most grotesque
and arduous manipulations of his own rather gaunt physical appearance. To
accentuate the monster’s sunken cheeks, Karloff removed his dental plate. To
augment the monster’s physical stiffness, the actor was weighted down with
prosthetic boots.
In the novel,
the monster is disfigured but articulate, pleading and even reasoning with
Victor after he has been shunned and driven out by the local town’s people for
his hideous appearance. The movie chose instead to render the monster mute,
perhaps as a way of heightening his exclusion as ‘the other’ in society. Many
today forget the filmic Frankenstein
is more Shakespearean tragedy than classic horror; the monster with all his
angst, willingness to please and abject desperate for having failed to
assimilate into society, instead denied and tormented by it, made a sacrificial
parable for the Christ story.
James Whale,
who perhaps could share in some of the monster’s rejection (Whale being a
closeted homosexual) perceives the world at large as far more immoral and
terrorizing than any monster. Even Henry Frankenstein (Colin Clive) despises
his creation; in effect the offspring denied paternal affection and acceptance,
the resultant mayhem derived from this deprivation. Even the death of Little
Maria (Marilyn Harris) – the girl the creature tosses into the lake – is not an
act motivated by the monster’s desire to kill but rather his complete inability
to comprehend her incapability to float similarly to the flower petals cast
upon the water.
Karloff’s
performance as the monster is truly one of the most prolific and enduring. He
manages the seemingly impossible coup of transforming an outwardly hideous
creature into a genuinely sympathetic lost soul, one the audience can both
empathize with and yet simultaneously fear. There is inner ballast to Karloff’s
monster, the Pierce makeup allowing the actor’s deeper thoughts and expressions
to shine through; the monster truly coming to life while struggling to discover
his own place within a social structure in which there is no place for him.
That he resorts to terrorizing this human world in the third act is hardly a
surprise, given the complete effrontery of mankind to even investigative the
true metal of his physiological makeup. The screenplay does, of course, allow
for the possibility of absolute madness to overtake the creature; the theft of
a criminally insane brain perpetrated by Fritz (Dwight Frye), Henry
Frankenstein’s hump-backed assistant, later implanted in the monster, giving rise
to bouts of uncontrollable rage.
Yet Karloff,
Pierce and Whale have conspired to deliver a truly compelling performance far
removed from the clichés of unrepentant evil run amuck. The monster is neither
wicked nor good but a tragically flawed concoction of these polar opposites;
his self-loathing and dementia brought on by human-inflicted suffrage. Is any
of this the creature’s fault? Arguably, no, and the implication of man as the
villain of this piece remains rather unsettling and unexpected. Certainly, none
of the horror masterpieces gone before Frankenstein
(and most that have come since) probe this more explorative analysis of man’s
responsibility. The central theme of the movie may still be chills, but its
underbelly is a peerless psychological melodrama.
Charles D.
Hall’s production design is worth mentioning in that it begins with a startling
reconstitution of some never-never-land generally associated with Gothic
Europe; its ominous and slightly askew tombstones and barren landscape
dominated by Tyrolean gristmills, windmills, castles and even a gallows with a
dangling body, all evoking the 17th or possibly 18th centuries. Yet, the
university and, particularly Henry Frankenstein’s electrified laboratory
suggest the 20th century; perhaps inspired by the fantastical real-life
experimentations of Nikola Tesla with their shooting sparks and ominously
glowing orbs, pulsating and synonymous with the secrets surrounding the life
force. Hall has perhaps achieved an even more incredible feat by blending these
seemingly irreconcilable styles into a single believable topography, one in
which the audience can wholly fathom, as well as master, an understanding such
manipulations of life and death are possible.
Frankenstein made a star of Boris Karloff, although he was not the
studio’s first choice for the part. Indeed,
Frankenstein had been planned as a follow-up project for Bela Lugosi, the
original poster art with the creature’s eyes perceived as searchlight beams
playing on the hypnotically incandescence Lugosi’s depiction of Count Dracula.
But Lugosi balked at the project and Whale thought him entirely wrong for the
part. Karloff’s wan physicality, his stark bony features were much more Whale’s
idea of a cadaver brought back to life. It is rumored Karloff spent nearly six
hours a day in Jack Pierce’s makeup chair. Pierce was an artist, regrettably
not tolerated at Universal after the early 1940’s – his time-consuming
applications streamlined by Bud Westmore in later years as Universal continued
to churn out Dracula, Frankenstein, Wolf
Man and Mummy sequels. Like
Lugosi, Karloff was a soft-spoken cordial gentleman quite unlike his monolithic
alter ego. Therein, perhaps, lies the enduring success of the creature as
portrayed; sympathetically and with a tragic underlay of endearing sadness.
As our tale
begins we find Dr. Henry Frankenstein (Colin Clive), the brilliant, though
slightly demented scientist exercising his ambition to stitch together a human
out of body parts stolen from recently deceased and unearthed cadavers. Henry
keeps the secrets of life and death mostly to himself. On the surface at least,
he leads a very normal life that includes an engagement to wealthy socialite
Elizabeth Lavenza (Mae Clarke). Elizabeth confides her genuine concerns about
Henry’s secretive experimentations to friend, Victor Moritz (John Boles); a
sympathetic sort who desires Elizabeth for his own, although seemingly without
a jealous bone in his body. In the meantime, Henry’s humpbacked assistant,
Fritz (Dwight Frye) is instructed to steal a human brain from the nearby
university’s science department. Fritz is a simpleton clod. He accidentally
smashes the glass container housing a normal human brain and decides to make
off with another containing the cerebellum of someone who was criminally
insane.
On the eve of
a harrowing electrical storm, Elizabeth and Victor, together with Dr. Waldman
(Edward Van Sloan) make an impromptu visit to Henry’s hilltop laboratory,
discovering a vast complex of homemade devices built to harness these violent
energies – in effect, the power of God. The body of Henry’s creation, sheathed
in white linen, is raised on a stretcher into the skies, a strike of electrical
impulses stirring its mass of bone and sinew. Declaring himself ‘to be God’
Henry is driven near mad with excitement. But his elation turns sour when the
creature exhibits the first signs of becoming violent and eventually escapes
from his dungeon chains. The monster, however, has been tortured by Fritz with
fire. On his own, he makes several attempts to befriend mankind – all of them
ending in tragedy. Finding Little Maria playing near the lake, the monster is
shown kindness and reciprocates it. Regrettably, the monster’s inability to
fathom death causes him to throw Maria into the waters before deducing she
cannot swim. The child drowns and the monster’s sheer terror over her loss is
heartbreaking.
Discovering the
body, Maria’s father raises a posse to hunt down the creature. In the meantime,
Henry is preparing for his wedding to Elizabeth. But as Elizabeth awaits her
bridegroom in her upstairs bedroom she is terrorized by the creature, snuck in
through a window. Her screams bring Henry and Victor to her rescue. The
creature stalks Henry to a nearby windmill, Henry’s attempted escape seemingly
thwarted when the town’s folk – torches and pitchforks in hand – decide to set
fire to the windmill, thus destroying the monster, but also Henry in the
process.
Eighty-four
years after its premiere, Frankenstein
still packs a wallop. Part – if not all - of the film’s genuinely understated
beauty remains in Karloff’s central performance as the monster; fearful, tragic
and ultimately doomed to remain misunderstood and unloved. Indeed, from the
moment the monster comes to life he is treated rather appallingly by Henry and
Fritz (Dwight Frye), who chain him in a dungeon and terrorize with flames.
Karloff’s ability to convey so many varied emotions beneath the stifling amount
of makeup affords the monster a level of responsiveness the audience can
immediately identify with and appreciate. The first appearance of the creature
is undeniably shocking. Karloff emerges from the shadows with heavy brow, stitched
scalp and neck bolts photographed in extreme close-up. It’s enough to send even
the bravest toppling from their theater seats. But this initial fright is
compounded by a subtler display of the monster as mute wretch; the unwilling
participant in a grand social/scientific experiment gone wrong. Frankenstein endures as a cinema
masterpiece because of Karloff – billed as ‘the uncanny’ – an unconventional
and unlikely star who became something of the arbitrator of freakish thrills
throughout the 1930’s and 40’s.
Another
re-release from Universal Home Video, Frankenstein
on Blu-ray is another outstanding 1080p transfer derived from original nitrate
elements. Minor imperfections exist but this is a pluperfect transfer
exhibiting phenomenal clarity and fine detail with superb contrast and midrange
tonal grays. The image is both crisp and clean. The inherent audio shortcomings
are not quite as bad on Frankenstein
despite the fact it was shot the same year as Dracula. Restored in DTS-HD mono, Frankenstein’s audio an exemplary mastering of vintage sound
elements. The clarity in these monaural tracks made just a few scant years
after the advent of sound recording technologies is, frankly, astounding.
Extras abound,
beginning with two independent audio commentaries; one from Rudy Behlmer the
other from Christopher Frayling. Personally, I preferred Frayling’s for its arc
of cultural perspective. But both commentaries are definitely worthy of your
time and provide a fascinating back story to the making of the movie. We also
get the 45 min. DVD documentary ‘How Hollywood Made A Monster’, a 38
min. biography on Karloff with fond recollections from his daughter, the 1 ½
hr. documentary ‘Universal Horror’ hosted by Kenneth Branagh that provides a
fantastic retrospective on the studio’s many monster franchises, Boo!
- a short film from 1932, another bumper
crop of poster art, production stills and other archival photos, monster tracks
(trivia at a glance), trailers and an HD short on how Universal undertook its
restoration effort. Bottom line: highly
recommended, especially if you don’t already own the Universal Classic Monsters box set.
FILM RATING (out of 5 – 5 being the best)
4.5
VIDEO/AUDIO
4
EXTRAS
5+
Comments