MY COUSIN RACHEL: Blu-ray (2oth Century-Fox, 1952) Twilight Time
Richard Burton
marked a stunning American debut in Henry Koster’s My Cousin Rachel (1952), personally supervised by 2oth Century-Fox
chief, Darryl F. Zanuck and weighing – at times – rather heavily on the success
of Alfred Hitchcock’s Oscar-winning Rebecca
(1940), Samuel Goldwyn’s 1939 adaptation of Wuthering Heights, but also, Fox’s 1943 adaptation of Jane Eyre. Indeed, Rebecca and My Cousin Rachel
are owed other connective tissues; Brit-born literary giant, Daphne du Maurier
the author of both works, and composer, Franz Waxman having penned the film
score for each. In hindsight, it’s Waxman,
borrowing from himself, that lends ‘Rachel’ a sort of ‘hand-me-down’ quality; the otherwise outstanding
production infused with many fine performances, and, John DeCuir and Lyle
Wheeler’s gloomy art direction, perfectly photographed by master
cinematographer, Joseph LaShelle. Those with keener eyes will recognize
remnants of set design stolen outright from both the aforementioned Jane Eyre and 1943’s gothic
romantic/thriller, Dragonwyck; the
great halls of the fictional Ambrose Ashley’s Cornish ancestral home a
fascinating amalgam of all this Tudor bric-a-brac on display in another Fox
film: 1947’s Forever Amber. To add
even more of an air of authenticity, Zanuck had a second unit fly to England to
shoot process plates in and around the Cornwall coastline; later, effectively matted
into DeCuir and Wheeler’s production design.
My Cousin Rachel went through a rather fascinating
incubation. Du Maurier’s literary agent had rejected virtually every offer put
forth by a Hollywood film studio, hoping to sell off the rights for a cool
$100,000 and 5% of the international gross. He was to settle for $80,000
instead (nice work if you can get it!) after Zanuck negotiated the deal in
Sept. 1951. And while du Maurier was pleased with the payout she was far less
enthusiastic after seeing an early draft of the screenplay she referenced as ‘quite desperate’. Zanuck’s first choice
for director, George Cukor agreed. It was abysmal. And thus, Cukor would never
see the inside of a sound stage; the project assigned to Henry Koster instead.
Ironically, Nunnelly Johnson’s shooting script stayed very close to its source
material, jettisoning several comedic vignettes earlier written in that both
Cukor and du Maurier felt had weakened the overall taut and terrifying gloom of
the piece. In later years, rumors abounded Cukor had planned to woo Greta Garbo
from retirement to play the title role. At some point, Vivien Leigh’s name was
also mentioned in the running. Ultimately, Leigh’s Gone With the Wind co-star, Olivia de Havilland would assume the
part and emerge triumphant; the picture marking de Havilland’s big ‘return’ to
the screen after 1949’s The Heiress.
In the interim, the actress had departed Hollywood to concentrate on a
successful stage career.
At the writing
of this review, Miss de Havilland is 101 years young, and still very much a
vital and iconic grand dame from Hollywood’s golden age; thriving in her
adopted country – France. We have to give it to Olivia de Havilland; feisty and
fearless. For here is an actress who, for better or worse, helped foster a
life-long animosity with her own sister, Joan Fontaine (the two never spoke
after 1950), turned down a marriage proposal from the likes of screen mega-heartthrob,
Errol Flynn, and, successfully sued her alma mater, Warner Bros. in 1944 over
unfair work practices, resulting in The De Havilland Decree; whereupon the practice
of ‘extending’ an actor’s contractual obligations via suspension for failing to
partake in any assigned project was effectively overturned. If only for this,
de Havilland would be deserving of a place in Hollywood history. But what of
her legendary career; a star of the first quality and magnitude with enough
Oscar-nominations (if hardly, statuettes) to recommend some truly inspired
performances throughout her 60+ years in front of the camera. De Havilland’s
performance as the eponymous Rachel is among these.
As Du Maurier’s
novel never entirely reveals whether or not the widow, Contessa Rachel
Sangalletti is, in fact, an enterprising murderess, de Havilland’s superb
rendering of the character achieves a deliriously wicked tone of congeniality;
in tandem, ringing with pious sincerity and faux incredulity as a devious
viper. De Havilland’s sustained
suspiciousness is peerlessly reconciled against Richard Burton’s towering
intensity as the hot-blooded, romantically-stricken heir-apparent. The
supporting cast, including George Sutton (as Ambrose Ashley), Audrey Dalton
(Philip’s long-suffering betrothed, Louise Kendall), Ronald Squire (her father
and Philip’s godfather, Nicholas) and finally, George Dolenz (as slick consiglieri, Guido Rainaldi) are uniformly excellent. My Cousin Rachel remains a superior
entertainment because the cast comes together as few do, bringing the very best
to their game. Quite simply, there is not a false note among them. Still, the
picture is anchored by the steadfast sobriety of Olivia de Havilland’s
poker-faced and, at times matronly widow, steadily gaining ground without
seemingly sacrificing an ounce of personal integrity, and also, by Burton’s
fiery and inconsolable fop, hoodwinked in love, mislead by his passion.
Immediately
following the Fox fanfare, My Cousin
Rachel opens with a rather morbid prologue: young Philip (Nicholas Koster),
age 10, taken to the crossroads near the Cornish country estate owned by his
guardian, Ambrose; shown the remains of a ‘good
man’ turned to murder, and lifelessly dangling from a gibbet because he allowed
the dictates of lust to dominate his reason. We fade into the main titles and
Franz Waxman’s very ‘Rebecca-esque’ melodic strains;
broodingly romantic, but with an undercurrent of disturbing menace. Life at the
great house is resplendently assured. As Philip matures through his teenage
years (briefly played by Hamilton Camp), his devotion to Ambrose develops a
homoerotic underlay. Hence, their yearly separation to preserve Ambrose’s
fragile health is a torturous ordeal for Philip; comforted only by his
benevolent godfather, Nicholas, who sincerely hopes to marry off his daughter
to this master of the great house. To stave off the effects of England’s damp
and drafty winters, Ambrose elects to take his latest sojourn abroad in Italy.
Alas, he will not return.
Economically,
Koster’s direction and Nunnally Johnson’s screenplay make short shrift of what
follows: Ambrose, seemingly in love, and wed to the - as yet unseen - Contessa
Sangalletti. In marriage, Ambrose’s regular correspondences to Philip become
more sporadic – then, erratic; and cryptic – Ambrose suggesting his new bride
has become a destructive influence, conspiring with her consiglieri,
Guido Rainaldi against him. Gravely concerned, Philip departs for Florence
immediately, arriving too late at the shuttered Villa Sangalletti where he is
informed by its kindly groundskeeper (Mario Siletti) the widow has since
departed for parts unknown after the death of her husband. Overwrought with
emotion, Philip visits Ambrose’s grave and vows to put to torture the woman he
now suspects of hastening his guardian’s death. Philip journeys into town and
confronts Rainaldi, whom he cannot abide even at a glance. The solicitor is
gracious, but also a tad too accommodating and congenial for Philip’s
bitterness to tolerate.
Returning home
to Cornwall, Philip discusses the contents of Ambrose’s final correspondence
with Nicholas and also his suspicions regarding the unseen Rachel. Reluctantly,
Nicholas reveals to Philip that Ambrose’s death certificate reveals he died of
a brain tumor – a hereditary condition that afflicted and claimed the life of
Ambrose’s late father. Nicholas also informs Philip that upon his 25th
birthday he will inherit Ambrose’s ancestral home, since no provisions were
ever made in Ambrose’s Will to accommodate Rachel. Philip is stunned. It certainly
places his scenario – that Rachel murdered Ambrose for his money – in jeopardy.
Two weeks later, Nicholas receives a letter from Rachel. She has arrived by
boat in Plymouth and desires an audience with Philip. Directly, Philip invites
Rachel to remain at his house, plotting to use the occasion to confront,
humiliate and condemn her into a confession of murder. Instead, and almost
immediately, Philip falls under Rachel’s spell. She is uncharacteristically quite
the opposite of what he expected to find: hardly the wanton spendthrift Ambrose
alluded to in his later letters.
Pressed by his
own conscience, Philip does confront Rachel with Ambrose’s letters. But almost
immediately he is ashamed of his actions, tearing at the proof and casting its
crumpled pieces into the fire. Philip begs Rachel’s forgiveness. This, she
willingly offers and the two develop ‘an understanding’ that, at least for
Philip, blossoms into love. An intimacy is inferred, rather than revealed
outright; Philip, using the occasion of his 25th birthday – when he
has officially inherited Ambrose’s estate, to make the announcement he intends
to wed Rachel at the earliest possible convenience. Nicholas is hardly
surprised. Naturally, Louise is heart-stricken. But perhaps the most startling
reaction comes from Rachel who questions whether the wine has gone to Philip’s
head. She rejects his proposal outright. As she is ‘much older’ than Philip,
Rachel’s admonishment wreaks havoc on Philip with an almost maternal spank of
disquieting frigidness. That evening, Philip makes Rachel a present of the deeds
and of the family’s jewels. His love is undiluted. He wants Rachel to possess
what rightfully ought to have been hers through marriage to Ambrose.
The widow
resists…or is she merely feigning bewilderment? Accepting Philip’s trousseau,
Rachel still refuses to be wed to him. Philip’s mood is further soured when he
discovers Rainaldi has followed Rachel to England. The two periodically are
seen together and, although only in public, Philip begins to suspect perhaps
Ambrose was right: Rachel and Rainaldi did
conspire to destroy him. At the same time, Philip becomes aware Rachel has
given the gardener instructions to relocate a tree on the property, yielding
curious bean-like fruit that is quite toxic if ingested. Nightly, Rachel plies
Philip with a special herbal tea she brews from local berries and leaves. Not
long thereafter, Philip falls ill and hallucinates in tandem he and Rachel have
been married, and, Rainaldi and Rachel are scheming to see him dead. Days pass
and Philip awakens from his stupor to discover Rachel nursing him back to
health. Confused about what has transpired since his illness, Rachel makes it
quite clear to Philip his delusion of their marriage was simply that; no such
ceremony has taken place.
Again, Philip
begins to speculate Rachel may be plotting to put an end to him and thus be
free to marry Rainaldi; the two living off the estate she now lays claim to
officially. Prior to his illness, Philip had given commands for a terraced
garden to be completed. Now, the workers have also begun to toil on a sunken
garden overlooking the sea. The foreman explains to Philip the rather crooked
bridge high overhead will not bear any weight. Philip keeps this discovery to
himself and waits for Rachel to leave the manor house before encouraging Louise
to help him search for evidence proving Rachel has been slowly poisoning him
with her steeped and highly toxic tea made of berries from the tree in his own
backyard. Louise is skeptical, but obliges Philip in his search of Rachel’s
room while she is out. Alas, they discover nothing to incriminate Rachel.
Indeed, even Philip begins to doubt himself. Realizing Rachel is bound for the
footbridge, Philip races to prevent her from going over the edge. He is too
late, discovering her unconscious remains at the bottom of a very steep cliff
and frantically climbing down a trellis of vines in an attempt to rescue her.
Rachel briefly awakens in his arms, questioning “Why did you do it?” before expiring in his arms. In the movie’s
epilogue we witness Philip in the movie’s ‘Wuthering Heights’ moment; trapped
as Heathcliff in his twinkling of despair; in voice-over, revealing his doubts
about Rachel’s innocence or guilt. In death, she will likely forever haunt his
brain as a ghostly refrain to wretched love vanished.
My Cousin Rachel is deceptively romantic; book-ended
by a mournful homage to men of honor whose moral character is torn asunder by their
unquenchable amorous appetites. Disastrously, this is manifested as a
corruption of the soul; willful, ominous and self-destructive. And Richard
Burton – in his American debut – reveals with startling clarity the
machinations and enigma of the male mind, derailed by hormonal lust. As we see ‘his’
cousin, Rachel only through Philip’s wounded and, earlier dagger-filled eyes, our
perceptions of her virtue and moral integrity are already tainted before de
Havilland’s arrival on the screen, some twenty minutes into the story.
Reputation is a curious thing, and Rachel’s has been rather obnoxiously stained
by Philip’s ‘rush to judgment’ estimation of her perverted wiles, gleaned
solely from the final letters in Ambrose’s unravelling and mysterious inferences.
Did Rachel poison her first husband, the Count, and later Ambrose too? If so,
she might have done the same to Philip as he lay ill at home. Instead, she
nursed him back to health. Or did she merely fear a coincidence too obvious for
keener and more critical minds from her social caste, eager to condemn without
first analyzing the truth? As in du Maurier’s novel, Henry Koster’s direction
isn’t telling; and neither is Rachel, who dies either most unfortunately of all,
virtually innocent of her reputation, or, on the flipside, guilty as sin and to
satisfy Hollywood’s censorship code of the day that insisted all murderers pay
the price for their wickedness. My
Cousin Rachel ingeniously refuses to surrender a verdict. And thus, we –
along with Philip – are left to ponder the gravity of a man truly remorseful.
Has Philip sinned against the woman he supposedly loved? If so, he now faces
the Arctic desolation of his own contempt and a rebuke from love itself, denied
him for all time.
My Cousin Rachel arrives on Blu-ray via Twilight
Time and looking absolutely stunning, thanks to a new 4K remastered offering in
1080p from Fox Home Video. The B&W image is a sumptuous feast for the eye,
evoking a modicum of film grain looking very indigenous to its source. Contrast
is uniformly excellent and fine details abound in background information
throughout. You are going to love – LOVE – the way this disc looks. It’s that
simple. Age-related artifacts are nonexistent. The image is clean, smooth and
perfectly balanced. We sincerely wish all Fox deep catalog titles were afforded
as much consideration. The 2.0 DTS mono is well-balanced. Regrettably, Twilight
Time’s only extra is an isolated score track. No audio commentary. My Cousin Rachel is certainly deserving
of one. We would have also wished for Biography
Specials on Richard Burton and Olivia de Havilland. Several TT and Kino
Lorber Fox catalog releases have, in fact, included Biography Specials as part of their ‘extras’ content. But no –
nothing but the movie and a well-worn theatrical trailer. Bottom line: My Cousin Rachel looks ravishing in
hi-def. We highly recommend this disc for both content and transfer. It is as
perfect as you would want it to be.
FILM RATING (out of 5 – 5 being the best)
4.5
VIDEO/AUDIO
5
EXTRAS
1
Comments