GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS: Blu-ray (New Line Cinema, 1992) Shout! Select
Addressing the rank and ‘folly’ of a stupefied bunch
of company whores, pitching real estate to a motley and incompetent group of
investors, director, James Foley’s Glengarry Glen Ross (1992) remains a
thoroughly rancid exposé on the art of deception and deviousness involved in ‘cold
call’ selling. The picture is based on David Mamet’s 1984 Pulitzer
Prize–winning play, invested in two ugly days in the lives of four utterly
ruthless real estate salesmen whose motivations range from greed and blind rage
to desperation and fear. Although set in Chicago, the movie was actually shot
in New York City. Mamet jokingly referred to the picture as ‘Death of a
Fuckin’ Salesman’ – its actual title, a reference to the two fictional development
projects – Glengarry Highlands, and, Glen Ross Farms. A word here, before
proceeding. I have never much cared for Mamet in general or this play in
particular. I actually caught as a revival of Glengarry Glen Ross on
Long Island, long after the movie’s release, somehow anticipating it would play
better as stagecraft. And it isn’t Mamet’s high-octane level of profanity that
offends so much as it anesthetizes the audience with its litany of rapid-fire
insults. I suspect Mamet meant these to be diabolically clever. But after the first few moments, they
increasingly become nothing more evolved than the play and movie’s modus operandi
– a reason to insert bits of dialogue between each four-letter word, each more
misshapen in its heavy-handed indictment on life as Mamet knows it, or, would wish
the rest of us to ascribe with a similar strain and mantra – if not, in fact, merely
to adopt as his own verbatim. I don’t know about you, but I have sincerely
tired of such weak-premised/blunt and barb-laden diatribes pitched as pop
culture – or worse, intellectual high art. Frankly, I don’t need Mamet to tell
me the life of a salesman has increasingly devolved into a wickedly crude
pantomime of faux incredulity, just a sick joke where the name of the game is
to blind-side every potential client with a dazzling display of the traditional
shuck and jive. I get it. Sales is a tap-dance, a smoke-screen, a bullshitter’s
paradise where only the heaviest pounds can obfuscate the manure. Get on with
it then - and tell me something I don’t know.
In the intervening decades, Glengarry Glen Ross’
reputation has acquired cult status. Jack Lemmon was actually awarded Italy’s
Volpi Cup for Best Actor, while Al Pacino was Oscar and Golden Globe-nominated
for Best Supporting Actor at the time of its release. Curiously, however, and
critical accolades aside, the movie was not a bell-ringer at the box office, accruing
only $10.7 million on its paltry $12.5 million budget. And while box office is
not always indicative of a movie’s ever-lasting worth as pure entertainment, in
Glengarry Glen Ross’ case, I find its fiscal failure fitting. The strength of Mamet's authorship is also,
on this occasion, its biggest vice; front-loaded with incendiary dialogue that
desperately aspires to its own spirited logic and cadence. But Mamet has sincerely
forgotten that the kinetic energy built into the most effective usage of
dialogue is structured on sustaining the audience through points of interest, rather
than a cacophony of sacrilege. The characters who populate Glengarry Glen
Ross have that atrocious little glint of sycophantic joy caught in their
eyes as they spew venom all over the proscenium. No kidding – it is every actor’s
wet dream to just cut loose and cut everyone else a new hole in the process.
But smack talk only gets you so far. And
there is decidedly a difference between ‘flat’ dialogue, only to connect the
dots between points ‘A’ and ‘B’ and cleverly written odes that ignite the screen,
encouraging the audience to ‘fasten their seat belts, because it is,
decidedly, going to be a very bumpy night!’
I think my opinion of Glengarry Glen Ross is
even more negatively colored today than it was in 1992, by the utterly angry
performance given by Alec Baldwin who, in the interim, has proven himself much
closer to his alter-ego in this movie, the Rolex-wearing, self-anointed popinjay/salesman
from ‘downtown’ – Blake, who, in Mamet’s first epic diatribe, sadistically
bludgeons the will and desire of his sales team with profane-laden threats to
their sustainable way of life (such as it is) and masculinity. Blake doesn’t ‘shake
up’ his team so much as he throws a grenade into their powder keg of open
wounds and deep frustrations, offering no better than the precipitous clamor and
scatological ferocity of his own pomposity gone berserk. Blake is not there to
build them up; only, to tear them down. I suppose in this Bizzaro-land of
Jedi-mind-sales-trickery one could still consider Blake’s brutality as
motivational. Hellish, sad and foulmouthed – turned upside down, considered ‘inspirational’
in an ‘I’ll show him!’ sort of way. But the noose Blake effectively
slips about the necks of these panicky and discouraged fatalists offers nothing
to motivate their greed-driven ambitions, even for basic survival. Sell enough,
live to sell another day. Under-perform and you are history. Given the
alternative, Blake makes quitting look far more attractive. And while Foley’s
picture is packed with peerless performers who lend even Mamet’s exonerated crudeness
its potency, what, on stage, was a vigorous dark comedy about bottom feeders emerging
from their holes at dusk, instead reaches the screen as a sluggish, if stylized,
mortuary of wax-works leaches and bloodsuckers, out to extract every last pint before
acceding to the embalmers of their chosen profession.
Mamet's play was first performed in 1983 at the
National Theater, London. A year later, it had its Pulitzer and a lucrative run
in Chicago, then Broadway; caught by producer, Jerry Tokofsky who encouraged director,
Irvin Kershner to make a picture from it. Meanwhile, B-producer, Stanley R.
Zupnik saw the play and found it confusing, neither impressed by it or Tokofsky’s
desire to make the movie. Sensing blood in the water, Mamet held out for a
whopping million-dollar payoff: $500,000 for the film rights, $500,000 to adapt
the screenplay. In the face of Tokofsky’s passion for the picture, Zupnik
reluctantly agreed, hoping he could find a cable company to bankroll it. Alas,
no major studio wanted any part of Glengarry Glen Ross, citing its ‘abrasive
language’ as the real stumbling block, even with high-profile stars attached to
it. Eventually, financing was cobbled together from a German television station,
an Australian cinema chain, several banks and New Line Cinema, delaying the
picture’s release by roughly four years. Alas, in the interim, Kershner departed.
While big names were being juggled, Foley acquired a copy of the screenplay and
signed on with the understanding some heavy-hitters were already attached to
the roles; actors who could lend cache and credence, along with a certain
rough-hewn charisma. Mamet had, in fact, hand-crafted the role of Blake for
Alec Baldwin, who initially turned the part down. Owing to the movie’s modest
budget, Baldwin and his costars, to include Jack Lemmon, Al Pacino, Alan Arkin,
Kevin Spacey, and, Ed Harris, all took pay cuts to partake.
After 3-weeks rehearsal, cast and crew assembled to
begin shooting Glengarry Glen Ross at Kaufman Astoria Studios in Queens,
with a few location pick-ups in Sheepshead Bay, Brooklyn. Director of
photography, Juan Ruiz Anchía chose to preserve the play’s moodily lit
interiors almost verbatim from what they had been on the stage – indulging in
murky reds, violent blues, and bilious greens for the first half of the movie
taking place at night, steadily to evolve into a more monochromatic blue-grey palette
as the dawn breaks. While Foley’s approach to basically ‘work-shopping’ the
performances on film bode well for the actors, who worked well together and
quickly found their own momentum in Mamet’s barb-laden dialogue, behind the
scenes a different kind of storm was brewing as Tokofsky and Zupnik fell out
over money and screen credit; Tokofsky, suing Zupnik to have both his
producer's credit and fee shorn from the picture. In reply, Zupnik counter-sued,
claiming not only to have put up $2 million of the budget, but also accusing
Tokofsky of embezzlement.
Foley’s approach to the picture very much preserves the
two-act structure of the play, the first act introducing us to real estate
salesmen, Ricky Roma (Al Pacino), Shelley Levene (Jack Lemmon), Dave Moss (Ed
Harris), and George Aaronow (Alan Arkin). Of the lowest class of salesmen, each
is involved in a con to sell land in Florida and Arizona to clientele of the
disinterested and/or penniless ilk, fed on leads provided to them by office
manager, John Williamson (Kevin Spacey) shilling for unseen bosses, Mitch and
Murray. Under the guise of a sales meeting, uptown shark, Blake (Alec Baldwin)
accuses his team of laziness and assures everyone that at the end of their
month's sale contest the bottom two sellers will be unceremoniously canned. Blake
also reveals a new valuable set of leads has arrived, but will only be shared
with salesmen who can close their current deals. Afterward, Shelley, suffering
from dry rot in his career, begs Williamson to let him have first crack at the
new leads. He tries everything – charm,
insults, bribery, but to no avail. Momentarily tempted, Williamson agrees to 20%
percent of the commission plus $50 per lead, then reneges when Shelley cannot
pay upfront. Desperate, Shelley first taps a cold call – Larry Spannel (Bruce Altman),
who rejects him outright, before concentrating all his efforts on a dimwitted
couple, Bruce and Harriett Nyborg.
Meanwhile, Moss and Aaronow team up – Moss, spending
the bulk of their road trip ranting to the passive Aaronow and eventually
proposing vengeance of a kind – to steal the Glengarry leads to sell to rival
Jerry Graf, who has done well with his own indie business. Realizing Moss has
already entered into such an arrangement with Graf, Aaronow is very reluctant
to partake, especially when he realizes Moss expects him to break into their
office and steal the leads. We turn to Richard ‘Ricky’ Roma who, by virtue of
his exemplary sales record, is given a pass on the meeting and instead spends his
time at the China Bowl restaurant, conversing with James Lingk (Jonathan Pryce),
whom he dazzles with philosophical monologues before pitching him the
literature on a Florida land opportunity. By dawn’s early light, Williamson
discovers the office has been broken into and telephones the police. The detective
(Jude Ciccolella) begins interviewing the salesmen.
Roma pesters Williamson about the status of James Lingk's contact, to which
Williamson informs his payment has already been filed with the bank. Elated,
Roma declares himself the winner of the sales contest, refuses to take on any
more ‘old leads’ and eases a decidedly giddy Aaronow, who fears talking to the
detective. Enter Shelley, with good news of his own - an $82,000 sale with the
Nyborgs. Before the particulars can be revealed, a belligerent Moss exits the
interrogation room, insulted, and storming out of the office, presumably to
have quit on the spot. Shelley finishes his story to Roma, who congratulates
him on his sale.
Now, Shelley demands new leads from Williamson. Seeing
Lingk arrive at the office, Roma has Shelley pose as his client. Only Lingk now
reveals his wife wants him to renege on the deal or she will call in the
state's attorney. A hysterical Aaronow emerges from his interview with the
detective. Now, Roma convinces Lingk to get a drink. He also suggests his check
has not yet gone through. Misinterpreting the conversation, Williamson assures Lingk
the check is good and has already been cashed. Distraught, Lingk departs the
office, causing Roma to lay into Williamson before attending the detective.
Now, Shelley verbally attacks Williamson, calling him out on his lie, as Lingk’s
deal is still on his desk awaiting approval. Williamson realizes only the
person who broke into the office could know for certain that contract has not
yet been filed with the bank. Under pressure, Shelley admits, he broke in and
sold the leads to Jerry Graf, who is working with Moss. Threatened with
exposure for his crime, Shelley begs Williamson to look the other way as his
latest score with the Nyborgs clearly proves his is the most lucrative sales
pitch of all, to which Williamson informs Shelley the Nyborgs are mentally ill,
poor, and basically wasted his time. Unaware
of the situation, Roma emerges from his interrogation and praises Shelley for his
discretion on the Lingk situation. Roma proposes they go into business for
themselves. Unable to dissuade Roma from this venture, Shelley attends the
detective, knowing he will have to confess and go to jail. Having observed
everything, Aaronow resigns himself to starting a new round of cold calling –
hopelessly trapped in a ‘dead end’ future.
Glengarry Glen Ross is the sort of spoilt exposé on shit-kickers
and sales pitchers one would expect to find mildly amusing to downright
gripping, given Mamet’s pedigree for rocking the boat. However, having
assembled an exemplary cast, Foley’s picture suffers almost immediately from an
inbred ennui, anchored by Mamet’s fidelity to his own play. It isn’t just that Mamet’s style, under the
rubric of ‘keeping it real’, is both pessimistic and gloomy. It’s that the
entire cast appear to have been restrained from going all the way in their performances.
The standouts here are Al Pacino, who eschews his latter-day bent for self-parody
and caricature, unearthed ad nauseum in other film roles from the mid-1980’s
onward, often requiring him to be obscenely overwrought with shrieking
frustration, and, arguably, Jack Lemmon, who turns ‘magic time’ on end with his
slippery and manipulative turn as the ill-fated Shelley. Both are at the top of
their game. Mamet’s message, that everyone is wholly responsible for the
decisions they make in life, is pointedly clear. But the candy-floss finale, in
which destiny is presumably linked to one’s own motivation or lack thereof, skewed
always toward failure rather than success, is weak and untrue. The big problem
here is Foley’s direction, trapped in the claustrophobic atmosphere of Mamet’s
stagecraft. Worse, the theatricality of certain set pieces works against the
reality of the situations as presented. As example: has anyone ever balled out
their boss while they just stand there – arms folded – and take it, absorbing
every last word? I don’t think so. Finally, there is the mind-numbing use of
the word ‘fuck’ – exhibited some 138 times in a little under 2-hrs. and wearing
out its welcome after the first half dozen or so references.
Arguably, it has never occurred to Mamet most of
society passes through life trying to avoid such loaded exchanges. Again, if
you have to front-load your dialogue with profanity to make a point, there is
not much of a point to be made – nor, for that matter, much of a story to tell.
And thus, we come to the end of Glengarry Glen Ross feeling nothing - as
though we have just exited a world where nothing matters. Personal integrity?
What’s that? Moral high ground? Does it even exist? According to Mamet and this
movie – no. And Mamet has also forgotten that in the movies, if not in theater
or life, one needs at least one character to which an audience can relate.
There are no such ‘heroes’ present here – not even of the lesser evolved ‘wafer
thin’ archetype, on which a modicum of empathy can grow. I get it. Mamet’s play
is not meant to appeal to our altruism. He functions from a world view elevating
the ugliness of humanity at large as the cultural norm, and, where the lesser
of two evils is still pretty despicable. Even so, every den of thieves has at
least one adventurer on whom all is not lost as yet, and very often, something
finer from within is momentarily stirred – even with tragic results.
Shakespeare understood this. Mamet does not. Hence, even if we could consider Glengarry
Glen Ross as a tragedy, as Shelley’s final curtain call is a rather bittersweet
pill to swallow, at some level Jack Lemmon has already proven his character cannot
be trusted, is as unscrupulous as the rest, though ultimately, not nearly as
clever to escape retribution like the others. So, no hero here. Not even an
anti-hero. Only a sacrificial lamb. So, what does it take to succeed in
business? According to Glengarry Glen Ross, a set of brass balls. What does
it take to be a hit film? Evidently, a lot more!
Glengarry Glen Ross arrives on Blu-ray via Shout! Select
in a marvelous new 4K 1080p transfer culled from an original camera negative
that will surely please. The 2:35.1 image is gorgeous, with a bold and fully
saturated color palette, exquisite contrast, superb rendering of fine details
and exceptional reproduction of film-like grain. Truly, there is nothing to
quibble about here. The image is rock solid, exhibits no black crush, and,
looks about as authentic to film as any digital transfer can aspire to, minus
the usual flair ups of age-related debris and untoward digital tinkering that
oft deprives us of a truly outstanding home video presentation. The 5.1 DTS
audio is aggressive and shows off James Newton Howard’s jazzy score to its very
best advantage. Shout! has put its best foot forward on the goodies too: a new ‘conversation’
with James Foley, and, a retrospective with Broadway’s Ricky Roma - Joe
Mantegna, who waxes affectionately about working with Mamet. Holdovers from
before include 3 audio commentaries; one with Foley, another with Jack Lemmon,
and a third – scene specific – with reflections from Alec Baldwin, Alan Arkin,
Juan Ruiz Anchía and Production Designer, Jane Musky. Finally, we get the ‘Always
Be Closing’ documentary - a junket to promote the movie back in 1992.
Bottom line: Glengarry Glen Ross is still not my cup of tea. But Shout!
has afforded it all the bells and whistles every movie deserves, but too few
actually receive. This Blu-ray is a
winner, even if the movie is not. Judge and buy accordingly.
FILM RATING (out of 5 – 5 being the best)
1.5
VIDEO/AUDIO
5+
EXTRAS
5+
Comments