HANS CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN: Blu-ray reissue (Samuel Goldwyn, 1952) Warner Archive
A painfully puerile attempt to celebrate the Danish
author of so many beloved children’s fables, Charles Vidor’s Hans Christian
Andersen (1952) is an absurdly lavish, though woefully undernourished
claptrap, loosely stringing together several of Andersen’s more celebrated
fairy tales into an incomprehensible ‘biography’ that even the film’s prologue
laughingly refuses to acknowledge and I quote, “Once upon a time there lived
in Denmark a great storyteller named Hans Christian Andersen. This is not the
story of his life, but a fairy tale about the great spinner of fairy tales.” Well
put, but erroneously executed with the usually effervescent, Danny Kaye herein
recast as an elfin clod, seemingly unable to slip into his clogs and fly a kite
at the same time. Kaye, who made his name and reputation as an irrefutable
genius of pantomime, slapstick, and, improvisation under an exclusive contract
with Samuel Goldwyn throughout the 1940’s, in a series of classy smash hits as
the leering comic of formidable panache and timing, is very un-Kaye-like herein.
And it does neither the star nor his Danish alter ego any favors. Kaye is in
exceptional voice, as he proves throughout the Frank Loesser score. He is
particularly affecting in “Anywhere I Wander” – a melodic love ballad –
and “The Ugly Duckling” – sung to brighten the spirits of a forlorn
child, obviously suffering from some great illness. But for the rest,
Loesser’s songs are moppet-happy treacle of the most absurd order; as in the
jovially self-congratulatory and feather-weight “I’m Hans Christian
Andersen” – interpolated throughout various vignettes, whenever Kaye’s
misguided wanderer feels he needs to reassert his own legacy upon his ever-loyal
travelling companion, Peter (Joey Walsh) or the unsuspecting inhabitants of “Wonderful
Copenhagen”, and even more repetitively idiotic warbling of the “Inchworm”
or “The King’s New Clothes” – all bounce and modest fizzle.
Goldwyn’s overzealous verve in producing this clunker
with all the trappings money can buy was, for better or worse, a big hit in
1952. Clearly the innocence of the piece appealed to many a mid-western mom, dragging
her little Tommy Fluffball and Suzy Cream Cheese off to the Bijou for the
Saturday matinee. Don’t get me wrong. I love sugary sweetness and family entertainment.
But it must be universal in its appeal in order for it to become
timeless. Even as pure cinematic
storytelling of the musical/comedy ilk, Hans Christian Andersen is
problematic; Zizi Jeanmaire and Farley
Granger, herein cast as temperamental ballet dancer, Dora - whom Hans falls
haplessly in love with - and ballet master/hubby, Niels - not above giving his
prima donna the back of his hand when she fails to whirl like a dervish on
stage. Clearly neither Niels, nor screenwriter Moss Hart had come to appreciate
the ramifications of spousal abuse on the kiddy mindset. But in transforming
the Dane’s most celebrated children’s author, Hans Christian Andersen
into a socially stunted adult, both the man and the artist are ill-served in
this Hollywood glam-bam. The scholarly storyteller of history, christened a
national treasure, gets unceremoniously reconstituted as a somewhat effete
middle-aged shoemaker who knows absolutely nothing about life or women. Worse,
Danny Kaye’s rendering of the man, veers into self-effacing naĂŻvetĂ©.
The trajectory of Kaye’s career is definitely worth
noting here. He made his film debut in Moon Over Manhattan (1935), a
movie that garnered interest from New York–based Educational Pictures, who
signed him to play a curiously raven-haired, hysterical Russian for a series of
two-reel comedies in 1937. Kaye was also moonlighting in the Catskills under
the name Danny Kolbin when the studio suddenly went under, taking his career
with it. His next attempt, Broadway’s The Straw Hat Revue – was also
short-lived. But in 1941, he starred opposite the legendary Gertrude Lawrence
in Lady in the Dark, in which he nearly stole the show with ‘Tchaikovsky…and
Other Russians’ where he seemed to rattle off an endless litany of Russian
composers without taking a breath. Kaye followed this success up with Let’s
Face It (1942), another less than prominent theatrical endeavor. There was
an upside to this belly flop; namely, that Goldwyn – who had been scouting for
new talent to add to his picture-making roster, decided Kaye was a solid bet,
and signed him to star in 1944’s Up in Arms – a loose remake of 1930's Whoopee! And if Goldwyn briefly struggled to find the right properties to plug
in Kaye’s talents, radio proved an excellent filler: The Danny Kaye Show
on CBS (1945-46) a real crowd-pleaser that Kaye abandoned to participate in a
USO tour following the end of World War II. Meanwhile, Goldwyn had seemingly
discovered Kaye’s niche, casting his star opposite contract player, Virginia
Mayo in a series of glossy and escapist Technicolor fantasies, including the
delightful, Wonder Man (1945), The Secret Life of Walter Mitty
(1947), The Inspector General (1949). For 2oth Century-Fox, Kaye made On
the Riviera (1951), and then, for Paramount, White Christmas (1954),
The Court Jester (1956), and Merry Andrew (1958). So, Kaye’s
commitment to Hans Christian Andersen was not so much a kick start to his
even bigger successes of the decade, but a fond farewell to Goldwyn, for which
a goodly investment had been made on his behalf to make the movie a big and
boisterous Technicolor extravaganza.
The venial plot, scripted by the otherwise usually
brilliant, Moss Hart, based on a story idea by Myles Connolly, is basically an
excuse to shoe horn a series of musical skits, dream sequences and ballets to
celebrate the real Andersen's most enduring literary masterworks: The Ugly
Duckling, Thumbelina, The Emperor's New Clothes and The Little Mermaid.
And while audiences were enchanted with the results, the Danish authorities –
never consulted by Goldwyn – were not at all pleased with the distillation of
their beloved author into a rather buffoonish peddler of tales. For Goldwyn,
the movie marked the beginning of his final flourish as an indie producer. Ousted
at the outset from the newly amalgamated Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer studios in 1929, Goldwyn
became a maverick producer with big dreams, and even bigger ambitions to see
them through. The concept for Hans Christian Andersen had, in fact, been
bubbling in his creative genius since 1936 and, in 1941, he approached Walt
Disney to produce the picture. Alas, Disney – encumbered by the weighty
financial investment, and tepid box office receipts on Pinocchio and Fantasia
(both in 1940, and neither to have proved a winner) was hardly in a position to
entertain Goldwyn’s offer. And thus, the deal fell apart.
Hans lives with his apprentice, and Jiminy
Cricket-styled social conscience, Peter (Joseph Walsh) inside a not terribly
prepossessing cottage on the outskirts of their modest town. The children adore
Hans’ stories. But the adults – particularly, the schoolmaster (John Brown) –
see Hans as a threat to their inevitable maturity into productive members of
society. It is a fair concern, as Hans seems to exist within a social vacuum of
his own design; his out of the way sequestering of the prepubescent population
– lured over the bridge and away from their parents - and studies - to sail a
kite, by his deliberate design, undermining adulthood with a curiously faint
whiff of pedophilia to boot. Seriously, if ole Hans is lonely, he ought to get
himself some adult friends and leave the toddler sect alone. Town council
eventually elects to remove Hans from their midst and Peter, having overheard
their plans, makes haste to Hans’ home beforehand to encourage him to take a
much-needed vacation, thus sparing him the embarrassment of being evicted.
After some reluctance, Hans agrees to go to Copenhagen with Peter – the two
embarking on what is hoped will be a great new adventure. Alas, their introduction to this papier-mâché
recreation of ‘Wonderful Copenhagen’ is hardly warm-hearted. In fact,
Hans is promptly arrested for advertising his profession as a seller of stories
before the King’s statue.
Once again, Peter comes to Hans’ aid and soon Hans
finds work with Copenhagen’s ballet company. He is asked by its prima
ballerina, Dora to create a new set of toe shoes that will allow her to stand
for longer periods. Prior to this request, Hans has observed the brutality in
Dora’s relationship with husband, Niels; the company’s director. The two
deliberately taunt one another with insults and barbs. Dora accuses Niels of
having boorish and unattainable expectations and he suggests she has been
deliberately unprincipled and undisciplined in her craft. The two then physically assault one another
with Hans, at a distance, utterly horrified any man should treat any woman in
such a fashion – especially, one he professes to love. Hans develops and
incurable loyal streak toward Dora, toiling all night to create dancing
slippers that will treasure her feet. In
the morning, Hans presents the shoes to Dora for her approval. She is immensely
touched by his diligence, quaint modestly, and, tenderly affectionate stance
toward her. But how could Dora conceive Hans’ emotions to be anything more than
human kindness when he seems completely to lack that spark of male animal
magnetism and is thoroughly incapable of attracting her as a potential mate. Peter
begins to sense Hans’ attachment after Hans writes ‘The Little Mermaid’
as an homage to Dora. Misunderstanding Hans’ true intention, Peter
inadvertently gives the story to Dora who becomes enchanted by its whimsical
simplicity and Niels, believing Hans has written it for the company, rather
than his wife, elects to turn it into an opera. Hans, however, is quickly
whittled out of the creative process by Niels, who increasingly finds him a
minor nuisance.
The next day Hans notices a bald child, Lars (Peter J.
Votrian) being ignored by the local children as he tells his stories in the
public square, and thus concocts the tale of ‘The Ugly Duckling’
expressly for Lars’ entertainment. In
gratitude for this simple kindness, Lars’ father (Miles Mander), who also
happens to be a publisher, elects to print Hans’ stories for the whole world to
read. However, just when it looks as though Hans’ future is looking bright,
Peter intrudes to clarify for Hans he will never mean anything more to Dora
than in friendship. This scene, predominantly in Hans’ admonishment of Peter,
whom he orders to return home without him, tingles with a rather transparent
air of homo-eroticism. Bitter, though obliging, Peter leaves Hans who pursues
Dora at the opera on the eve of the premiere of The Little Mermaid. At
Niel’s command, the stage doorman (Robert Malcolm) quietly bars Hans – who has
designed a brand new pair of shoes for the occasion - from seeing Dora, and Niels
compounds this insult by locking Hans inside one of the rehearsal halls where
he remains, thus missing out on his own triumphant debut. The next day, Niels –
superficial and heartless – suddenly remembers Hans is still locked in the
rehearsal hall. Infuriated with her husband, Dora orders Hans brought to their
bedchamber where he can bear witness to Dora’s love for her husband. Realizing
Peter was right all along, Hans packs his things and hurries to catch up to Peter
and apologize. They are reconciled and reprise several bars of the movie’s
title song before returning to their village. As Hans’ published stories have
preceded his return, he is now regarded as a national treasure and welcomed
back with open arms.
Hans Christian Andersen is so utterly
dishonest in its premise, so manipulative in its plaintive plucking at our
heart strings that it instantly fails to win our affections in any lasting or
sincere manner. For all of the aforementioned reasons, this glossy – undeniably
expensive – and even more incredulously studio-bound super production utterly
bombs. The ballet sequences, choreographed and occasionally danced by Roland
Petit, are a hodgepodge, lushly photographed in Technicolor by Harry Stradling,
though heavy-handedly edited by Daniel Mandell. Had the spectacle of it all
been handled with a tad more aesthetic agility, perhaps the movie might have
avoided such incredibly misguided and idiotically hokum. Alas, the gloss here
is superficial at best and wears thin only a few moments into the story. Danny
Kaye’s benign and subdued central performance is instantly grating on the eyes,
if marginally soothing to the ears. In the final analysis, Hans Christian
Andersen limps into its own, as a big-budgeted booby-trap of artistic
misfires. These have become more glaringly obvious with the passage of time.
Quite simply, the film does not hold up. Frankly, it is a sincere wonder that
it ever did.
Warner Archive’s Blu-ray reissue jettisons the plush
digi-book packaging for original cover art. Otherwise, this is a straight
port-over from the previous Blu-ray and is at least welcome for those who do
not share my view of the movie. Grain is a tad thicker on this presentation –
odd, as vintage 3-strip Technicolor was a grain-concealing process. Still,
colors remain remarkably vibrant – a tribute to those metal-based dyes yielding
mostly impressive results. Occasionally, differential shrinkage of the elements
results in modest halos cropping up here and there. None will terribly
distract, but they are nevertheless quite obvious when they occur. Solid
contrast and excellent fine details abound. Age-related artifacts intermittently
intrude, but are mostly kept to a bare minimum. Truly, this visual presentation
will delight. The audio is DTS mono, but exhibits a startling amount of clarity
and bombast – particularly in its score. Other than a theatrical trailer, there
are NO extras. Bottom line: for connoisseurs of Kaye only. The rest can pass
and be very glad that they did.
FILM RATING (out of 5 – 5 being the best)
1.5
VIDEO/AUDIO
4
EXTRAS
0
Comments