ROMEO AND JULIET: Blu-ray (Paramount, 1968) Criterion

I have read varying reports to suggest director, Franco Zeffirelli’s adaptation of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet (1968) to either irrefutably be the greatest of them all, or merely a slim ghost flower whose saving grace remains its casting of two teenagers – Olivia Hussey and Leonard Whiting – to actually play the ill-fated teens in this coming-of-age romantic tragedy. Somewhere between these polar assessments lies the truth, though I have always personally appreciated the 1936 MGM effort more, not the least for its studio-bound ersatz glamor and a more earnest reading of the principle parts, because they were played by actors, Leslie Howard (age 45) and Norma Shearer (age 34), far too old, but with a truly sincere grasp on the emotional ballast in the bard’s literary prose. At age 17, Hussey gives a generally nuanced interpretation of Juliet’s passion for Romeo. Alas, Whiting – one year her senior – is about five-years too stunted in his own adolescence to actually get that our Romeo wants far more from his Juliet than a romp in the sack.  

Addressing the elephant in the room: in most recent times, the picture’s reputation has been questionably sullied by a bizarre $500 million lawsuit perpetuated by its two, then, pubescent leads (now ages 71 and 72 respectively), each claiming Zeffirelli tricked them into appearing in the raw for their cosseted love scene. It is more than a bit of a slog to take this suit, and its claim of mental anguish and lost job opportunities seriously (especially since Hussey had a pretty lucrative career after this movie) – first, because its one-time stars have waited so long to launch into their faux indignation, and second, because Zeffirelli and the picture have enjoyed such untainted renown for so long. In the more liberated sixties, Zeffirelli’s daring was praised. As late as 2018, Hussey herself told reporters her brief nude scene ‘wasn’t a big deal!’ What precisely occurred to change the actress’ mind since remains open for discussion. Interesting, though, that she would have waited until Zeffirelli’s death (he died in 2019) to file her claim – easier, I suppose, when the man cannot defend himself.

As for the ‘unguarded moment’ in the picture, it contains all of a brief flash of Whiting’s butt-crack as he gets out of bed to part the drapes and take in the dawn, followed by Juliet’s beckoning from the bed, and after a bit of polite cuddling, Hussey rolling over for a split-second reveal of her breasts. It all takes less than a half a minute, during which time the costars are reciting Shakespeare’s dialogue with a confident air of afterglow. But from this inconspicuous and tasteful reveal, the post ‘MeToo’ critics have suddenly re-fashioned Zeffirelli’s reputation as a leering pedophile. Aside: hardly! Actually, not at all. This is not – I repeat – NOT – a testament or affirmation that Zeffirelli got his rocks off flying a moment of kiddie porn under the laissez faire radar of the sixties. Those who believe as much really do need to give their heads a shake over their artificially engorged moral indignation. If the courts decide in favor of Hussey and Whiting, it will not only set a legal precedent but, in fact, skew more towards the hype and hyperbole associated with this filing, rather than validate in any meaningful way the truth of what actually occurred on the set back in 1968. We’ll see. But I digress.

For those who do not already know the ill-fated tale of Romeo and Juliet, it involves the star-crossed virgins of two households – the Montagues and the Capulets – bitterly locked in a longstanding feud. These clans break into a vicious street brawl, parted by Verona’s Prince (Robert Stephens), who forewarns future altercations will be met with severe reparations. That same night, Romeo (Montague) meets Juliet (Capulet) on the sly during a masked ball given at the latter’s family estate. Romeo sneaks into Juliet’s private garden, wooing her as she preens on her balcony. Secretly wed the following day by Romeo's confessor, Friar Laurence (Milo O’Shea), with the complicity of Juliet's nurse (Pat Heywood), the couple retreat to the relative safety of their families’ homes. Unknowing of their union, Juliet's cousin Tybalt (Michael York), furious over Romeo crashing the ball, challenges him to a duel. As Tybalt is now ‘family’, Romeo refuses to fight him, leading his noble friend, Mercutio (John McEnery) accepting the wager in his stead. Despite his best efforts to thwart this conflict, Tybalt mortally wounds Mercutio, who curses both houses before expiring. Enraged, Romeo retaliates, killing Tybalt. Banished from Verona by the Prince, Romeo nevertheless manages to spend a wedding night with his bride before skulking away.  

Unaware that the bloom of their daughter has been rubbed off, Juliet’s parents arrange for her to wed Count Paris (Robert Bisacco). Unable to convince them to postpone the wedding, Juliet implores Fria Laurence to intercede on her behalf. Instead, the wily Friar concocts a deception that will prove all of their unravelling. He gives Juliet a potion to consume that will feign the impression she has died. After her burial, Laurence will send Friar John to collect Romeo, henceforth to liberate his bride from her tomb as she awakens from her drugged stupor. All goes well at the outset. Juliet succumbs to the potion and her parents believe in her death. Alas, Friar John never arrives with word of the ruse. In total despair, Romeo attends Juliet in her tomb, committing suicide by drinking poison – certain, their spirits will be reunited in the netherworld upon his death. Meanwhile, awakening from her imposed slumber and finding her lover lying close by, Juliet reasons there is no place on earth left for her. She plunges a dagger into her bosom and dies nearest her lover’s remains. Afterward, the Montegues and Capulets reconcile. Nevertheless, their truce is admonished by the Prince, who cannot help but acknowledge how their blind-sided blood feud has contributed to the needless sacrifice of two innocent lives.

Shot silent – with virtually all dialogue, music and effects post-synced in the dubbing process – and costing $850,000, Romeo and Juliet was hailed as a masterpiece in its time, considered by far the most engaging cinematic adaptation of any Shakespearean play. Zeffirelli conducted a fairly aggressive search to find the perfect actors to fill these roles. Rumor has it Paul McCartney and Anjelica Huston were early frontrunners. Trimming considerable girth from Shakespeare’s more trying speeches, while also to leave several moments of the play – already shot – on the cutting room floor, Zeffirelli’s tightening of the drama and action relied mostly on reaction shots to fill in these gaps. It works, even if it isn’t ‘strictly’ the play. Zeffirelli also stumbled upon the participation of Sir Laurence Olivier who, already in Rome to shoot The Shoes of the Fisherman (1968), offered up his services for any additional work Zeffirelli might need to complete his movie. In reply, Zeffirelli not only gave Olivier the prologue to recite, but rather indiscriminately had him dub for Lord Montague and several other minor roles. The picture was shot primarily in Tuscania, Pienza, Gubbio, and Artena, with virtually all interiors lensed at Rome’s famed Cinecittà.

Viewed today, this version of Romeo and Juliet is still quite effective, if tame. It’s best moments spring forth from the perpetual conflict between the dueling households. The famed balcony scene also hits its mark, with Hussey in particular, exuding all of the lust and longing of her alter ego as she stretches forth to reach for the hand of her beloved. Nino Rota’s sensitive score, Pasqualino De Santis’ cinematography, and, Danilo Donati’s gorgeous costuming conspire to recapture the glory of 14th century Renaissance Italy (the latter two, winning Academy Awards). If anything, the picture retains a certain air of freshness, unusual and apart from the usual embalming of Shakespeare’s stagecraft on the screen. Is it the best cinematic adaptation of any Shakespearean play ever put on film? I would sincerely argue it runs a distant third to Kenneth Branagh’s exemplars – 1996’s Hamlet and 1989’s Henry V.  That said, there is certainly nothing wrong with being the bronze-medal winner. And Zeffirelli’s reputation as a picture-maker and story-teller par excellence, truly, has nothing to be ashamed of here.

It's more than a little off-putting of Criterion to release a tale about two teenagers committing suicide for love on Valentine’s Day. But no one can quibble over the quality of this new 4K restoration, except that it’s only getting released in 1080p. There is some residual softness to plague the titles and first reel. But afterwards, the image decidedly crisps up, achieving boldly saturated colors, with excellent overall contrast and a light smattering of grain looking indigenous to its source. Criterion’s PCM mono adequately supports the original theatrical sound mix. There’s nothing exceptional here, but it is solid nonetheless. Criterion is decidedly thin on the extras. We get barely a 5-min. excerpt from the 2018 feature-length documentary on Zeffirelli. Why the rest remains MIA is a curiosity. There is also 2 archival interviews with Whiting and Hussey, conducted by the BFI in 1967, and a Q&A from 2016, also with the co-stars, as they appeared for a prestige screening in Santa Monica. Finally, a trailer and liner notes from scholar, Ramona Wray. Ho-hum. The beat goes on. Bottom line: the lawsuit notwithstanding, Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet marks a considerable achievement in screen adaptations of Shakespeare. There is much room for praise here, and little to suggest what became of its co-stars thereafter is now worth a half-a-billion dollars in reparations for emotional distress. Oh, please!

FILM RATING (out of 5 – 5 being the best)

4

VIDEO/AUDIO

4.5

EXTRAS

1 

Comments