THE DANIEL CRAIG COLLECTION: 4K UHD Blu-ray (Sony,Fox/MGM, Eon, 2006-15) Fox Home Entertainment
Next April, or so it would seem, Daniel Craig’s tenure as Britain’s most
dedicated super spy, James Bond – 007, will come to an end. At this point, frankly – I just do not care;
the world of Bond having moved on with or without Craig’s participation, or rather,
having been downgraded over the last several decades, from the suave bon vivant
of the espionage class to just some thug muscle in a three-piece suit, performing
with far less finesse and infinitely more mixed martial arts maneuvers than I suspect
even Bond’s creator, author Ian Fleming would have preferred. And too, I have
grown ‘groan’ weary of Craig’s cagey attitude towards the role that has
singularly put his name on the international scape of filmdom; his chronic
threatening, that every Bond film after Quantum of Solace (2008) was
going to be his absolute last, only to linger, delay and then, finally, jerk
his fan base around like a bunch of marionettes, sheepishly announcing, ‘oh
no, I’m doing the next one too.’ Under the old home guard of co-producers Albert
‘Cubby Broccoli and Harry Saltzman, and, their well-oiled machinery Danjaq/EON
Productions, Bond films used to come out – one – every other summer. By the
time of their release, they were the most highly anticipated movies of the
season. And, as far as actioners went – there was nothing to touch the Bond
franchise for cutting edge stunt work, exotic locales and a vast assortment of
scantily clad beauties from the international jet set. All this changed after
Timothy Dalton’s departure; the travesty that was – and remains – 1989’s Licence
to Kill. In truth, producers had desperately wanted, and sought out Pierce
Brosnan (then, of NBC’s Remington Steele fame) for the coveted role. NBC’s
conspiratorial nature to delay Brosnan’s contractual release (he could have
shot the Bonds while on hiatus from his hit TV series) – and, just long enough
so Broccoli had to go with Dalton or renage on his already prearranged release
date for the upcoming The Living Daylights (1987), and then, the network’s
even more spiteful decision to cancel Remington Steele at the height of
its popularity, forced Brosnan into nearly a decade’s long purgatory of Diet
Coke/Bond knock-off commercials, simply to pay the rent. It also forced the
Bond franchise into an artificially induced limbo from 1989 to 1995 when, freed
from the legalities, Brosnan was finally able to mark his big screen debut as
the debonair secret agent. Alas, the Brosnan Bonds after Goldeneye (1995),
in retrospect, lack impetus and, even more importantly, that sly intelligent
charm Roger Moore infused into the character. Over the course of seven movies,
Moore had remade Bond his own image, and every Bond since has had to grapple with
audience’s expectations for a witty quip and pithy retort, flung off the cuff
with such panache, it positively reeks of some regal stealth and air of superior
confidence. Fleming’s Bond was never quite so polished.
So, for those who preferred Connery’s Bond to Moore’s – and, let’s be
honest – most everyone does (aside: I enjoy both Moore and Connery for very
different reasons…also George Lazenby, without whose hasty departure after 1969’s
On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, Moore’s foray and tenure as James Bond would
not have been possible), Daniel Craig, ostensibly represented an incarnation of
Bond closer to Fleming’s original intentions. Yet, Craig has proven a rather
tough sell, at least for me: the ‘blonde Bond’ with an oddy angular physicality
(you cannot compare Craig’s musculature to Connery’s edgy panther-like reflexes.
Connery looks utterly debonair in a tux, while Craig appeals more as the
eye-candy/reverse sexism/copy-catting of Ursula Andreas, rising from the sea in
1962’s Dr. No, in a scene mirrored in 2006’s Casino Royale), with
a decidedly less sophisticated approach to his work. Connery’s Bond used
physical violence only when cooler methods of dispatch were not at his disposal
– a lover first, and then, a fighter. Craig’s Bond breaks out the fists and
kick-boxing at the least provocation, viewing the female sex with austere
disdain. The Daniel Craig 007 movies therefore represent what director, Martin
Campbell described for the foreign press as ‘Bond for real.' Personally, I prefer to check realism at the
door when going to see a Bond movie; the classic Bond adventures, sheer
testosterone-charged escapism. Another aside: there has been something of a
concerted effort ever since Casino Royale to infer all that had gone
before it was a stagy pretext for ‘getting back’ to ‘Bond’s roots’, with
criticisms most heavily heaped on Roger Moore as the ‘Bond light’ of the
franchise; all but overlooking the fact, Moore’s outings as Bond are among the
most successful installments in this classic series.
The 21st James Bond action/adventure, Casino Royale is arguably
faithful to the series’ roots and Fleming's book. And yet, perhaps fearing a
backlash from going too dark and dangerous all at once (ostensibly, this had
been Timothy Dalton’s undoing) Craig’s 007, takes on various shades that hark
all the way back to both Sean Connery and Roger Moore’s personas as the
character; Craig’s man-handling of Eva Green’s double agent, Vesper Lynd, a
riff on Connery’s classic mistreatment of Daniela Bianchi’s Tatiana Romanova in
From Russia With Love (1963), while Craig’s deliberate smashing up of a
stuffy German tourist’s Mercedes, posing as the valet at a country club, before
casually tossing away the keys, smacks of Moore’s tongue-in-cheek. Upon its
theatrical release, Casino Royale was hailed as a masterpiece with several
critics declaring Craig ‘the best Bond ever’ – idiotic hyperbole,
indeed. For starters, chronology is a big problem for Casino Royale. Plot
wise, it predates Dr. No (1962), establishing how Bond earned his double
'O' status. Yet, the settings for Casino Royale are contemporary. As
such, we are asked to set aside the rest of the Bond franchise before delving
into this movie – trading Bernard Lee’s ‘M’ for Judi Dench; eschewing main
staples like Miss Moneypenny and ‘Q,’ and tolerating alterations made to the
trademark ‘gun barrel’ opener that has introduced every Bond movie since
Dr. No.
On this outing James Bond (Craig) has just been awarded his double 'O'
status. M (Dench) feels that the appointment is a shay premature, especially after
Bond kills Ugandan terrorist, Mollaka (Sebastien Foucan) under the watchful eye
of embassy cameras. The assassination creates a minor international scandal.
Nevertheless, Bond surfaces in the Bahamas to keep a watchful eye on Alex
Dimitrios (Simon Abkarian) and his wife, Solange (Katarina Murino). But he
quickly migrates to Miami to stop Alex from bombing a plane. In Miami, Bond
also learns Le Chiffre (Mads Mikkelson) has gambled the world terrorist
organization’s bankroll on a dip in airline stocks, presupposing the stocks to
plummet after the bomb went off. As this did not happen, Bond and Le Chiffre
are now mortal enemies in a high-stakes poker game, set to take place at
Montenegro’s uber-chichi Casino Royale. Enter the beguiling Vesper Lynd (Eva
Green), a double agent and Rene Mathias (Giancarlo Giannini), who presents
himself as a contact and point man for Bond. At the start of the game, Bond
gains the upper hand by deducing Le Chiffre's tell. During a brief respite,
Steven Obanno (Isaach de Bankolé), a leader of the Lord's Resistance
Army, previously introduced to Le Chiffre by Mr. White (Jesper
Christensen), the spurious liaison of an undisclosed criminal organization, becomes
quite incensed at the loss of his funds. Obanno ambushes Le Chiffre in his
suite with a machete, but permits him to follow through with his plan to win
back the money. Bond intercepts Obanno and his bodyguard, killing both men with
considerable ease.
Presumably traumatized by the encounter, Vesper is comforted by Bond.
Alas, she refuses to fund Bond’s further playing. Frustrated, Bond is about to
kill Le Chiffre when he is introduced to fellow player, Felix Leiter (Jeffrey
Wright) - a CIA operative who agrees to stake Bond in exchange for being allowed
to take Le Chiffre into American custody once the games are over. Bond rapidly
rebuilds his position in the poker match until Le Chiffre’s gal/pal, the
viperous Valenka (Ivana Miličević) poisons Bond’s martini with
digitalis. Retreating to his Aston Martin for an antidote and a defibrillator, Bond
loses consciousness but is revived by Vesper. He then returns to the game, accruing
a $115 million forcing all but Le Chiffre out of the running for the grand
prize. go all in. Predictably, Bond wins with a straight flush. Celebrating
their victory, Vesper is kidnapped by Le Chiffre’s men. Bond makes chase in his
Aston Martin. Le Chiffre has his men tie Vesper down and leave her in the
middle of the road. To avoid running her over, Bond swerves in a hellish crash
and is taken captive. This leads into the infamous ‘ball-bashing’ scene, whereupon
Bond, stripped naked and tied to a cane chair, is repeatedly abused by Le
Chiffre who is prepared to castrate Bond. Mercifully, Mr. White murders Le Chiffre and
his associates for their failure. Miraculously, he leaves Bond and Vesper
alive.
Sometime later, Bond awakens in an MI6 hospital. He orders Mathis
arrested as the traitor. as Swiss banker, Mendel (Ludger Pistor) arrives
and Vesper and Bond provide the account number and password to transfer their
winnings. Bond declares his love for Vesper and considers resigning from MI6. The
couple depart for an extended holiday in Venice. However, when M telephones
Bond, informing him that the money was never deposited, Bond suddenly realizes
Vesper has been playing him all along. Bond tails Vesper to a handoff of the
money. However, Vesper is now taken hostage by the gunmen. Bond shoots the
building's flotation devices, causing its foundation to crumble and sink into Venice’s
Grand Canal. Trapped inside the elevator, Vesper apologizes to Bond before
drowning. A deeply wounded Bond cradles her lifeless body in his arms while Mr.
White, observing it all from a distant safety, casually walks away with the money.
M now reveals to Bond that the mysterious organization backing Le Chiffre had
kidnapped Vesper’s lover. So, her theft of the money was predicated on love –
not some wicked deception for personal profit. Bond tells M he will return to
service, after discovering a final text message left by Vesper. We fast track
to an estate at Lake Como. Having located Mr. White, Bond incapacitates him
with a superficial wound to the leg, standing over him to make his formal
introduction, “The name's Bond. James Bond.”
Casino Royale is a superior installment in the Bond franchise for
several reasons. The first is Craig's performance that completely bowls and
wins us over from the start. Despite a legacy that would intimidate most
actors, Craig assumes the mantel with a gutsy pride and his own inimitable
brand of avenging justice. For this brief wrinkle in time, Craig was the new
Bond for a new generation, his steely-eyed satisfaction pushing the envelope
just this side of becoming a vigilante/antihero, while remaining faithful to
the Bonds of yore. Alas, Craig was to falter, rather miserably, in his second
Bond outing; Marc Forster’s Quantum of Solace (2008) which borrows its
title, but precious little else, from a Fleming short story. Bond interrogates
Mr. White, but is betrayed by M’s bodyguard, Mitchell (Glenn Foster) who was
supposed to pay hit man, Edmund Slate (Neil Jackson) to kill Camille Montes
(Olga Kurylenko), the lover of environmentalist, Dominic Greene (Mathieu
Amalric). Bond learns Greene is assisting Bolivian General Medrano (Joaquin
Cosio) to overthrow the government. The rest of the plot is basically a race
against time, but the story quickly degenerates into a dark and insidious
thriller with an uncharacteristic body count. Bond’s old ally, Rene Mathis
(Giancarlo Gianninni) agrees to accompany him on his mission to Bolivia where
they are met by MI6 operative, Strawberry Fields (Gemma Arterton). Both Fields
and Mathis are later murdered. Until Quantum of Solace the resident
hallmark of virtually every Bond pic was its suspension of disbelief into pure
escapist fantasy. Yet, Quantum of Solace repeatedly betrays this
time-honored edict, devolving from an iconic Bond actioner into a David Fincher
styled thriller. It doesn’t work: plain and simple. Despite the fact it remains
the highest grossing Bond movie of all time, Quantum of Solace left a
very bitter taste behind for most fans; one that the much-anticipated release
of Skyfall did not entirely rectify.
Sam Mendes’ Skyfall (2012) is not so much a throwback to
Connery’s Bond as it quickly gets weighted down by Mendes’ downer of a screenplay.
Skyfall is attempting to do too much all at once. We get an even less
glamorous and unrefined Bond this time; Craig, looking like eight miles of very
bad road in Detroit, spending much of his time chest-thumping against opponents
unworthy of his talents. Add to this Javier Barden as an effete MI6 rogue agent
with a ‘mommy fixation’, dressed as though he bought his outfits off the
‘blue-light special’ rack at K-mart, and the return of Moneypenny, reincarnated
as tough, sexy – and black?!?! – and, Mendes’ dossier on Bond is a bio only a
‘M’ could love – and possibly, not even then. Skyfall is not a Bond
adventure but a sort of deconstructing back story about this iconic movie creation
we, really do not need to know all that much about. Craig’s habitual need to
bring a contemporary action anti-hero’s thirst to the role is wanting for
something more intelligent to relay. Since 1989, Bond’s producers have
gradually made the conscious effort to embrace a more serious undercurrent, in
keeping with Ian Fleming’s original intent. But the cream of the jest with the
cinematic Bonds – especially Connery and Moore’s Bond had always been that
while Bond seemed capable of just about anything – and quite often behaved in ways that would
have downgraded the reputation of any other movie hero - except Bond - to the
status of a common brute in a three-piece suit (like damn near choking Denise
Perrier with her own bikini in Diamonds Are Forever, 1971), Bond then
nevertheless wore the Teflon-coated mantle of a debonair raconteur, his
knowledge of the finer things in life giving 007 at least a veneer of
refinement completely absence in Craig’s hulking brute.
For all his earthy naturalism, Daniel Craig has quickly devolved James
Bond into just another rock ‘em/sock ‘em self-destructive goliath of no great
distinction. Those old enough to remember Bond in his prime – classy, unruffled
and immaculate – will be very hard-pressed to find even a glimmer of the bon(d)
vivant. Craig’s Bond is rough trade at best; a scrapper, unconvincingly
masquerading as a gentleman. Craig hasn’t taken the series back to the halcyon
days of Sean Connery; rather, turned Ian Fleming’s super spy into the Jean
Claude Van-Damme of MI6 who can beat the hell out of most any opponent with his
bare fists and drink most drunks under the table while getting more than slightly
snookered himself. Why the elitist MI6
would choose to keep this guy in Vodka Martinis, much less consider him their
number one pick to repeatedly save the world is, frankly, beyond me. Skyfall’s premise embroils Bond and
fellow operative – Eve Moneypenny (Naomie Harris) in pursuit of French
assassin, Patrice (Ola Rapace) for the murder of an MI6 agent and the theft of
a NOC list, containing the real names of NATO agents in danger of having their
international cover blown. Gee, where have I seen this before? Oh right, in
DePalma’s Mission Impossible (1996)!
Bond and Eve make chase through the bazaars of Turkey (shades of From
Russia With Love) and Bond and Patrice ride motorcycles atop the rooftops a
la 2009’s The International starring Clive Owen. Inexplicably, the passenger train Bond and
Patrice now find themselves on also contains a single flatbed with a massive
bobcat crane – presumably because the Turks have absolutely no idea what sort
of insurance liability this represents. Bond mounts the crane and uses it to
dig into the passenger car directly in front where Patrice is hiding. Eve, a
horrible shot, is ordered by M (Judy Dench) to take Patrice out with a massive
assault rifle from her awkward hillside vantage. But whoops; she misses her
mark and hits Bond in the chest instead. He plummets like a stone from a
rickety trestle into the raging river beneath, presumably to his death. Bond,
dead? Where have I seen this before? Oh right, You Only Live Twice
(1967) – one of my least favorite Bond movies of all time.
Back in London, M is under pressure from Gareth Mallory (Ralph Fiennes),
chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee, who wants to dissolve MI6,
presumably because spying is an outdated means of gathering top secret data. I
am not entirely sure what he intends to replace it with – world news updates
from CNN? Mallory informs M she has two months before her enforced ‘retirement’
and M replies she intends to get to the bottom of the NOC list theft before her
departure. It’s all very glib in a pinky’s up, stiff upper lip, tight-ass Brit
sort of way. She patronizes him and he treats her condescendingly like a relic
from the Cold War. Bond resurfaces (of course, he does) and learns someone has
hacked into M’s computer to blow up MI6 headquarters by triggering a gas leak.
M assigns Bond a new handler, Q (Ben Whishaw as a prepubescent computer genius
whose only gadgets for Bond this time around are a Walter PPK sensitive only to
Bond’s touch and a radio transmitter that vaguely resembles a magnet I
currently have stuck to my fridge). Bond tails Patrice to Shanghai and briefly
hooks up with Sévérine (Bérénice Marlohe); a former child
prostitute, reared and repeatedly reamed by Raoul Silva (Javier Bardem); who
basically bought her outright when she was only twelve. Yeeeuuuck! Bond
promises to kill Silva to protect Sévérine. Instead, Silva kills his paramour
and is then apprehended by MI6. It’s all part of Silva’s plan; to be caught,
then escape, then be caught again; then, riddle a courtroom where M is giving
her deposition in a hailstorm of bullets, but in such a way so as not to even
wound M once. Bond takes his boss to his family’s secluded country estate, Skyfall,
in the Scottish Highlands. Of course, Silva and his men follow them, leading to
a showdown and the unlikely assassination of M, who forgives Bond for failing
to protect her. In the final moments, Bond is reunited with Eve atop a building
in downtown London – her last name, so we learn, is ‘Moneypenny’. Meanwhile,
Gareth becomes the new M.
At this juncture, Daniel Craig began to drop hints he was done with
Bond. Personally, I would not have been altogether sad to see him go; done with
the gun-toting hypocrite, who affects a taste for fine wine, expensive cars and
hot women, but cannot help but wind up shirtless and pathetically soaked
through with hard liquor while wallowing over the loss of his beloved
mommy-figure, ‘M’ (Judi Dench) and deceptive lover, Vesper Lynd (Eva Green).
Craig’s Bond also suffers from a general disdain for the British government –
yeah…the same government funding his lavish expense account. I also wish this
Mr. Bond would quit banging twenty-cent tarts or philandering married gals of a
certain 'prime' with equal aplomb and noblesse oblige. Sean Connery’s Bond
would never have been caught with these sloppy seconds; ditto for Roger Moore’s
laid-back – if morally ambiguous, though deliciously amused 007. The secret to
either man’s longevity as Bond – James Bond, that is – remains
steadfastly affixed to each’s ability never to take themselves or the work of
super-spying quite so seriously. In the shadow of film makers like Terrance
Young, Guy Hamilton and John Glenn, among others, who intuitively understood
part – if not all – of Bond’s sex appeal lay in the cream of the jest (he
actually ‘cures’ Pussy Galore of her lesbian tendencies in the novel, Goldfinger);
also, the series’ perpetually sun-drenched and appealingly exotic locales. I observe, with more than a modicum of
regret, no such thoughts have crossed the mind of director, Sam Mendes who
continues to inveigle his Mr. Bond in convoluted and badly realized vignettes
mired in the dank, dark despair of post-post-postmodernism run amok. Spectre
(2015) is one of the bleakest, weakest and most graceless footnotes in the Bond
franchise, morbidly afflicted by our present-day preoccupation with a theater
of death.
In fact, after the mercifully reinstated, trademarked gun barrel opener,
the pre-credit sequence to Spectre takes place on ‘The Day of the
Dead’ celebration in Mexico City; Bond, attempting to kill three would-be
terrorists. Bond’s interception is foiled by a hotel explosion. Once again,
James has come too late to this party. In the good ole days, MI6 would have
debriefed their numero uno answer to Nietzsche’s superman who, thereafter,
would have become the catalyst to stop these baddies in their tracks. But no –
it’s a new day for Bond, increasingly the bungler of such clean kills that turn
into very messy ‘international incidents’ of the blood-soaked grind house variety.
The hotel explosion leads directly into a somewhat tedious chase through the
congested streets, all shot with the frenetic ‘Steadicam’ energy of a
break-dancing chicken by cinematographer, Hoyte Van Hoytema; Bond on a die-hard’s
mission to apprehend ringleader, Marco Sciarra (Alessandro Cremona) – the real
assassin who survived (of course he did!) this attack. In the ensuing
struggle, Bond and Sciarra board a helicopter; Bond eventually tossing Sciarra
from it to his death; though, not before he recovers a ring with a stylized
octopus etched into its band. Given Bond’s previous outings with this
international spy syndicate known as Spectre, the fact he needs MI6
clarification, and a little help from Ms. Moneypenny (Naomi Harris) to identify
the emblem, remains something of a curiosity. Perhaps too many knocks on the noggin
have finally taken their toll on our Mr. Bond.
Personally, I do not believe it proper to put a chronically sullen and
squinty-eyed Bond on display as the proverbial piñata, enjoyed for a good swift
kick (and far more), repeated marked as a dinosaur for extinction, and cruelly
blamed for all the wrong and ridiculousness in the world; a sort of anti-heroic
worldview, presently adopted by the denizens of dreck in Hollywood and
increasingly favored by audiences. To paraphrase Bonnie Tyler, “I’m holding
out for a hero!” It is a good thing I am sincerely not holding my breath
too, because somewhere along the road to this Bizarro-land degradation, where
virtues and traditions are trampled on and disdainfully observed with
increasing moral ambiguity, as a society we have replaced the definitions of good
vs evil with the laissez faire ‘gray area’, marketing such unadulterated
swill as art – high, low or (and, in most cases) woefully indifferent. Viewed
from this stagnation, one could almost champion a pervert like Christoph
Waltz’s Ernst Stavros Blofeld as doing the morally ‘good’ work by drilling
holes in Bond’s cranium with a Black and Decker. Grotesque torture scenes like this one have
become the norm in Bond movies since Craig’s testicles were thrashed with fetishistic
aplomb by Mads Mikkelsen’s Le Chiffre in Casino Royale. In Spectre,
Waltz’s Blofeld goes after the other head, enjoying Bond’s cringe-worthy
suffrage for a few excruciating moments that leave much to be desired since –
no kidding – we are assured Bond will always survive whatever hellish
circumstances befall him – even a crude pseudo-lobotomy.
Spectre isn’t out of the realm of possibilities for a
post-Connery/Moore Bond flick. But that is not saying much and precisely, it
proves my point. It hovers in the foggy ether as a nondescript installment to
this once highly anticipated franchise, steadily brought down several pegs with
each subsequent installment since Moore’s exit; with Spectre, a fait
accompli to the unremarkable era of the ‘every Bond’ movie; dangerously
close to the precipice of being just par for the course. Certainly, Craig – who
has repeatedly threatened with each new installment to be ‘un-officially’ done
with his alter ego, seems to be going through the motions herein. He’s older
too; at 47, less buff and more sullen than serious, looking to move into his
emeritus years and/or diversify his portfolio with roles apart from the one
that continues to make him a star. Personally, I am not one of those Craig
worshippers who, having idiotically labeled him “the best Bond ever!”
now seem as myopically ‘shaken and stirred’ by the prospect of facing that day
when Craig will no longer be Bond. Actually, I am rather looking forward to it,
and was hoping Spectre would be his swan song; goodbye, and don’t let
the Aston Martin run you down on the way out. For a while now, I have had my
own ideas as to who could – and should – be the next 007; the list
beginning with Henry Cavill, Clive Owen or Ewan McGregor. Each would bring
something new and likely invigorating to a role Craig seems willfully to
despise with increasing frequency, holding out for his even more obscene
paycheck to reprise the part.
Spectre is, at 148 minutes, one of the longest and most
self-involved Bond movies ever. Superficially, at least, it has everything one
might expect from a classic Bond thriller: stylish sets, exotic international
locales, outlandish action set pieces, and a turbo-charged erotic femme
fatale. Still in absentia: the
uber-clever Bond super villain a la an Auric Goldfinger or Hugo Drax; although,
Christoph Waltz’s Blofeld retains the traditionalist evil-doer’s verve for
pointlessly labyrinthine ambitions about conquering the whole world, doomed to
remain an avatar’s pipe dream in the end. Everything one could imagine on a $300
million budget is present and accounted for, and yet, none of it looks the
part…well, maybe, Léa Seydoux forthright Bond girl, Madeleine (no, no
misogynistic monikers like Dink, Pussy Galore or Holly Goodhead…this Bond girl
is all grown up, though predictably bumped out in all the right places). I keep
reading a lot of pseudo-feminist critiques about Bond movies refusing to ‘move
with the times’ and accept strong women in lieu of the ‘Bond girl’. My
sincere advice to those expecting a Linda Hamilton-Terminator 2-styled
butch to suddenly break out the guns instead of the bubbly for Bond; don’t go
to see a Bond movie! It’s not your cup of tea – Earl Grey or otherwise! Indeed,
Craig had to dodge a militant press corp. repeatedly browbeating him about the
so-called ‘problematic views’ of women in Bond movies. Note to anyone
harboring the misguided notion any Bond girl, past, present or future, is
designed to be anything more than a sultry, slinky sex kitten for our Mr. Bond
to bonk – she’s not.
To be fair, Spectre addresses some, if not all of ‘the
problem’. Léa Seydoux gets in a few licks, but has the ever-loving snot and
wind knocked out of her by steroidal henchman, Hinx (David Bautista). Face it,
girls; he is meaner, uglier and ramped up on better synthetics than Madeleine.
She never had a chance. But to be clear, Bond movies of yore were created to
appeal to a male audience: real men and boys who couldn’t wait to grow up and
aspire to be James Bond. Poor deluded devils! Bond was never meant to get in
touch with his feminine side. According to a recent Cosmo poll, neither do real
women who would prefer a ‘take charge’ protector alpha male to a sensitive
‘yes’ man – especially, in the bedroom. So, perhaps, Bond’s only genuine flaw
is he is remains unapologetic about being that surrogate for guys who have
already surrendered their testicles to the media castration of the male sex;
their urges, needs and inherent behaviors viewed as bad – or at the very least,
wrong – while everything their significant other does is celebrated as clever,
inspiring and structured around high-minded principles of altruism. Oh, who’s
telling tall tales now? And I have news for any aspiring Bond director in the
future who believes the next Bond movie should present Bond with a female
counterpoint every bit his equal. You will lose half, if not all of your loyal
Bond viewership if that day ever comes to pass. After all, it is a James Bond
movie we have paid to see: not James Bond…and friends.
One of the most grotesque tragedies befallen a great many Bond movies in
more recent times – is a weak villain. Spectre has one of the least
inspired of the lot. The oversight becomes even more glaringly curious when one
considers how maniacally sinister Christoph Waltz can be, given the right part
and more than an arm’s length of experimentation to discover it within himself.
Waltz ought to have been the linchpin to propel Spectre into that
top-tiered echelon still occupied by the likes of an Auric Goldfinger. But he
never gets this opportunity and quickly slips into just another ineffectually
bitter and grimacing cliché of villainy. Since Casino Royale, each
subsequent Bond movie has tried to provide plausible ‘cause and effect’
to carry over from one movie into the next. Too bad Bond movies were never
intended to be trilogies, quadrilogies, prequels, sequels etc. but stand-alone
entertainments with a certain level of threadbare continuity factored in for
good measure; the gadgets, pithy one-liners, merciless chiding of Bond by his
superior, ‘M’, gadget master, ‘Q’ and Miss Moneypenny; the Bond girls, with no
head, except what they ‘gave’ to the cause of satisfying our Mr. Bond in bed,
and so on.
The plot to Spectre is suspiciously like too many other more
recent Bond adventure yarns; James, taking one for the team yet again,
officially and indefinitely suspended from field duty by M (Ralph Fiennes). As
a parting gesture, ‘M’ has ‘Q’ outfit Bond with a sort of glamorized version of
the ankle bracelet – an injectable chip that can be monitored from anywhere in
the world. Meanwhile, ‘M’ is in the midst of a power struggle with ‘C’ (Andrew
Scott), head of the privately-backed Joint Intelligence Service, consisting of
the newly amalgamated MI5 and MI6. We get flashes of the old home guard caught
in the cross hairs of their debate; the gleaming white edifice that once housed
Judi Dench’s MI6, now a crumbling façade slated for the wrecking ball. It’s the
end of an era, or rather, the forced obsolescence of this once galvanic
espionage leviathan now viewed by ‘C’ as a foundering Cold War relic to be put
down once and for all. ‘C’ promotes his agenda in parliament. Britain will join
with eight other countries to form a consortium with the code name, Nine Eyes;
a global surveillance and intelligence initiative.
Against direct orders, Bond convinces ‘Q’ to quietly stop monitoring his
whereabouts. He travels to Rome, attends Sciarra’s funeral and confronts the
widow Lucia (Monica Bellucci) in the presence of some Spectre bodyguards. Their
tête-à-tête signs Lucia’s death warrant. That evening, as she prepares for her
assassination, Lucia is instead surprised when Bond suddenly reappears, easily
dispatching the henchmen sent to kill her before predictably making love to her
to seal the deal. Lucia confesses to Bond, Spectre is behind everything; their
international consortium closer than ever in their plans to rule the world.
Learning the whereabouts of their next clandestine meeting, Bond secretly
infiltrates the gathering; unnerved when its leader, Franz Oberhauser – a.k.a.
Blofeld (Christoph Waltz) turns in mid-address to the group to acknowledge him
directly. Bond is pursued by thug-muscle henchman, Hinx. In a harrowing car
chase solely meant to afford Bond the opportunity to show off the new toys
affixed to the revamped Aston Martin he has stolen from ‘Q’s laboratory, James
narrowly escapes this assassin. Previously contacted by James, Moneypenny now
informs him everything about Spectre’s plans points to Mr. White (Jesper
Christensen) – a former member of Quantum, since revealed to be a subsidiary of
Spectre. Traveling to Austria in search of White, Bond finds the recluse hiding
inside the basement bunker of a remote and seemingly abandoned chalet. White is
dying of thallium poisoning. But before the inevitable, he strikes a bargain
with Bond, pleading with him to protect his only child, Dr. Madeleine Swann
(Léa Seydoux) who is sure to become a target.
Offering White the honorable out, Bond leaves the room and White shoots
himself. James enters the Hoffler Klinik, a mountain-top retreat, under the
pretext of becoming a patient. But Madeleine is both hostile and unwilling to
accept Bond’s protection. Meanwhile, ‘Q’ has discovered a sinister link between
former agents Le Chiffre, Dominic Greene and Raoul Silva. All of them belonged
to Spectre. Meeting up with ‘Q’, Bond and Madeleine narrowly escape Hinx; a
daring chase by cable car, air and automobile, ending with a near death
experience for all concerned. Madeleine agrees to take Bond to L'Américain; her
late father’s favorite hotel in Tangier. There, a secret room in White’s suite
reveals the whereabouts of Oberhauser’s base of operations in the desert.
Traveling by train to this remote outpost, Bond and Madeleine are once more
confronted by Hinx. In one of the most brutal of all hand-to-hand combat
sequences ever featured in a Bond movie, the brutish Hinx, who once gouged a
man’s eyes with his bare fingers, now attempts to toss Bond from the baggage
car like a rag doll. Instead, Bond gets Hinx leg caught in a chain link
attached at the other end to a series of weighted barrels. Tossing the barrels
out the open door takes care of Hinx too.
Now, Bond and Madeleine arrive at a remote outpost in the middle of the
desert, surprised to find an escort waiting to take them to Oberhauser’s base
of operations, nestled in the middle of a crater. Oberhauser reveals to Bond
how Spectre will soon dominate the world, having been instrumental in securing
the Nine Eyes program and thus rendering all international protection agencies
utterly useless and at the mercy of his control. Bond is severely beaten by
Oberhauser’s henchmen and then strapped into a chair; Oberhauser drilling into
Bond’s cranium to extract the mutual history they share – seemingly one memory
at a time. Oberhauser reveals to Madeleine that when Bond was a boy,
prematurely orphaned, his father became Bond’s temporary guardian too. Jealousy
intervened as Oberhauser, believing Bond to have taken his place as the number
one son, murdered his own father and then staged his own death; later, to
resurface as Spectre’s puppet master, Ernst Stavros Blofeld. Oberhauser now
suggests he will drill into Bond’s mind, systematically enjoying the slow, sad
progression of Bond’s mental and physical infirmity. Instead, Madeleine interferes and, with the
aid of a gadget watch earlier supplied by Q, she is successful at stopping
Oberhauser from carrying out this dastardly plan. Bond and Madeleine escape
Blofeld’s compound, detonating a series of explosions that level it to the
ground. Back in London, Bond and Madeleine part company briefly. Although Bond
is in love with her, he accepts she cannot – and will not – be a party to this
espionage any longer.
Unhappy chance, Madeleine is captured and taken prisoner yet again by
Oberhauser who now presents Bond with an impossible dilemma. Either he uses the
remaining countdown to prevent Spectre from gaining access to the Nine Eyes
main data base – thereby thwarting Oberhauser’s plans to rule the world – or
save Madeleine from certain death, as Oberhauser has hidden her somewhere in
the bowels of the defunct MI6 building, destined to be detonated with explosive
charges. Bond gives ‘M’ the necessary information to pursue ‘C’ for his
complicity in Oberhauser’s plans. ‘M’
and ‘Q’ ambush ‘C’ at his office moments before Nine Eyes’ directive goes live.
‘Q’ manages to corrupt the program, thereby denying Oberhauser access to the
participating nation’s high security files. But ‘C’ and ‘M’ now struggle to
regain control of the system; ‘M’ causing ‘C’ to slip and plummet to his death
from an open window. Inside the old MI6 building, Bond manages to rescue
Madeleine with only seconds to spare. Viewing their escape from a nearby
helicopter, Oberhauser orders his assassin/pilot to fire upon the pair.
Instead, Bond manages an impossible kill shot, the helicopter crashing into
Westminster Bridge. Oberhauser has survived – just barely. He now taunts Bond
with this flawed victory; killing him will put an end to their rivalry, but
Bond will lose Madeleine’s love forever. Bond is tempted, but ultimately
chooses to leave Oberhauser to be arrested by the police. A short while later,
Bond and Madeleine are seen departing from his stylish London flat aboard the
iconic and presumably completely rebuilt Aston Martin DB-5 – inexplicably blown
to bits at the end of Skyfall. But this finale suggests Bond has chosen
a quiet life and marriage over more assignments for MI6. Has he? Hmmmm.
Spectre is occasionally a stylish affair, but mostly it
leaves a great deal to be desired. The plot is overly complicated and
nonsensical. Okay, it’s only a movie, as Hitchcock used to say. But the
villain of this careworn ‘world domination’ scenario is not even clever enough
to explain how Spectre’s technological espionage – advanced surveillance via
robots and drones – will render whole governments ineffectual and at his mercy.
In retrospect, the alliances begun in Casino Royale were the beginning
of a quadrilogy capped off by the events as unfolded in Spectre; the
lengthy thematic integration of various narrative bloodlines spread out over
four movies, heavily influenced by personal motivations with a singular, if
overreaching, arch of intrigue, and a not altogether successful parallel
between hero and villain who share a mutually flawed past. In Quantum of
Solace, Bond became a rogue agent, further muddying the clarity between
good vs. evil. But in Spectre, this line in the sand is more obscured –
or rather, clouded by chronically shifting alliances. Could the whole thing
really have been designed merely to exorcise a child’s grudge match turned into
a magniloquent revenge scenario: as in ‘you stole the love of my father so
I’m going to kill you’; Blofeld the mysterious architect of Bond’s pain?!?
Apparently, and rather simplistically - yes, although it has taken a good deal
more time than necessary to unravel this reality.
It still might have worked, except Waltz’s deadpan monologues
increasingly take on the flavor of wounded pontificating; soliloquies,
actually, devoted to his own self-importance; a sort of ‘anything you can
do, I can do better’ one-upmanship that will not rest and suggests, however
ridiculously, that Blofeld and Bond might have been compatible siblings, if
only one was not quite so noble and the other, ruthlessly psychotic. Of course,
allowing Blofeld to walk away from the fray at the end has set up the not
altogether out of the realm of possibility he will return in the ‘as yet to be
released’ No Time to Die. The stunts in Spectre are the most
impressive aspect of its production; the aerial helicopter assault during the
pre-title sequence, the flaming plane crash and Hummer chase through the
snow-capped mountains of Austria, the elephantine holocaust in flames that
levels Blofeld’s desert hideaway; these are executed with a frenetic energy,
all but ruined by cinematographer, Hoyte Van Hoytema. Rarely, does Hoytema
allow his camera to remain stationary or even focused on anything in particular
for more than a second or two, the blur in his continuity having a thoroughly
discombobulating effect. Action sequences in movies are meant to impress and
hold the viewer spellbound in the dark with their all-encompassing feats of
full-scale daring. The stunt work in Spectre is so shakily achieved, it
merely forces one to look away to settle a queasy stomach. Badly done! Like most Bond movies that have followed
Roger Moore’s record-holding tenure, this one is watchable, though unlikely
ever to be beloved. It has no staying power and zero credibility as a great
work of art, much less a worthy contender in the pantheon of great 007
adventures. Worse, like too many Bond movies from more recent times, it neither
sets a new standard, raises the bar, nor helps evoke the time-honored precepts
of the franchise as a whole.
Fox/MGM Home Entertainment has unfurled The Daniel Craig Collection
in 4K UHD; interestingly named for two reasons. First, this collection is
celebrating Craig – not Bond – and second, it presupposes collectors will want
to shell out now for a ‘collection’ that, as yet, is incomplete, as No Time to
Die will surely have to be considered as an appendage, worthy of inclusion a
year or so from now when another ‘collection’ gets reissued. Apart from an
abysmal marketing ploy, to collect on the interest and profits to be derived
from whetting consumer appetite for the ‘new’ Bond flick, I really do not see
the point of this 4K release. Predictably, the UHD elements culled for this
gathering of Craig’s Bonds is stellar with no complaints to be had – save one.
Honestly, this set is ultra-thin on extras. We basically get nothing on the UHD
discs, and the regurgitated standard Blu-ray releases included herein with the
extras that existed when they were originally made available some years ago.
The 4K image on all four Craig Bonds – Casino Royale, Quantum of
Solace, Skyfall, and Spectre rather predictably lead the way
in terms of audio/video quality standards, although it ought to be noted that only the last two movies have been rendered in native 4K, while the first two are derived from 2K up-samplings. Nevertheless, all four titles deliver marked improvements we have come to expect from 4K mastering efforts. Casino Royale’s
UHD transfer is, by far the most brightly contrasted of these;
owing to Phil Meheux’s lush cinematography. Here, colors pop with renewed
subtlety and fine details abound.
Arguably, the rest of the Bonds in this set offer even more impressive
upgrades, as their infinitely darker representations of the world of 007 now
achieve even greater depth of field, even under the lowest lighting conditions.
Spectre’s grain structure is more pronounced – even, heavy at times, but
still looking quite indigenous to its source. The DTS 5.1 audio here sounds
about the same as its standard Blu-ray counterparts, with subtle improvements
in the directionalized delivery of SFX. While only the 4K editions of Casino
Royale and Skyfall contain audio commentary options, the Blu-ray
editions of each movie house, in addition to these commentaries, the original –
if still scant – extra content as before; so, press and promo junkets, billed
as featurettes, music videos and theatrical trailers. Bottom line: I just do not get the same viewing
longevity out of the Craig Bonds that I still do from the Connery/Moore/Lazenby
flicks of yore. Owning Craig’s contributions in 4K has not improved the overall
tenor of their entertainment value either. These discs are flawlessly mastered,
however, and will surely please from a technical standpoint. But am I really watching James Bond movies just to see how razor-sharp the image quality can get?!?! Judge and buy accordingly.
FILM RATING (out of 5 – 5 being the best)
3 overall
VIDEO/AUDIO
5+
EXTRAS
1
Comments