THE BOY FRIEND: Blu-ray (EMI-MGM 1971) Warner Archive Collection
More gumbo
than pastiche, director Ken Russell’s The
Boy Friend (1971) over-baked the featherweight plot of Sandy Wilson’s 1953
toast of Broadway and, at its original road show length of 137 minutes became a
more complex, and in many ways more unnecessarily convoluted show within a show
for which Wilson’s unabashed and simple homage to twenties stage musicals was,
as inexplicably, revamped by Russell into an evocation of 1930’s movie musicals
a la Busby Berkeley. Disastrously overblown, and directed with a frenetic
chop-shop editing style that belied this simpler age of kitsch and coo,
Russell’s fearless attempt at a movie musical further compounded this insult by
adding girth and guile to an already gilded lily; the director’s yen for
garishness, smearing a patina of 70’s raunch over everything and transforming
what on stage had been innocence personified into an oft grotesquely ribald sex
farce. This, to be sure, only muddies the gloss of the original show: none of
it a part of Wilson’s tender-hearted milieu. MGM had purchased the property
back in 1956. Alas, owing to its simplicity and the studio’s then already sad
state of steady decline, The Boy Friend
was allowed to languish in their script vaults for decades while changing
audience tastes and the entire back lot climate of making movie musicals
continued to erode its popularity and staying power. Undaunted by the fact musicals
had hopelessly fallen out of fashion by 1971, Russell delved into writing a new
scenario himself to rival his aspirations for the musical sequences; determined
at the considerable expense of $3 million to achieve something quite unique, if
not entirely successful, on the big screen.
It all looked
mind-bogglingly colorful with impeccable Production Design by Tony Walton, sumptuous
and authentic costumes by Shirley Russell and David Watkin’s luminous cinematography
filling the peripheries of the vast anamorphic screen. Alas, with ambition
knowing no master, the picture, co-funded by EMI and MGM (by the early 1970’s
already on life support, with Las Vegas financier, Kirk Kerkorian about to
unofficially pull the plug) sank under the weight of an unanticipated rank
amateurism, or rather, the absence of that ephemeral quality for which no
amount of lipstick applied to any pig can transform it into a mink-lined purse
– star quality. It must have seemed like a surefire bet, casting Lesley Lawson
– better known to the world as Twiggy, and then the biggest name in runway high
fashion super models – for the lead in The
Boy Friend. And to be fair, the model cum movie star was to prove her
merit; of fair voice and impressive competency during the dance routines. Alas,
Twiggy is no actress, and neither it seems is Christopher Gable; the English
ballet dancer who not only costarred as the eponymous ‘boyfriend’, but also choreographed these occasionally impressive
routines. Though unexpectedly gifted when they took to the floor, the pairing
of Gable and Twiggy possess virtually zero on-screen romantic chemistry; the
one essential to salvage everything from becoming just another empty-headed and
over-produced bon-bon. Worse, Gable’s classically trained balletic gravitas lacked
the fundamental ‘stud quality’ of a matinee heartthrob, making his breathless
appeal to his heart-palpitating costar something of a truly bizarre joke or
grand mystery.
In support,
Russell cast the curiously asexual and occasionally effete Tommy Tune; all six
and a half feet of him, doing a robust buck and wing, and later, electrifying
Charleston opposite Antonia Ellis; as Maisie, giving over to a thoroughly
wicked impersonation of the superficial and back-stabbing sex kitten/flapper. Again,
zero on-screen chemistry between these two, despite Tune’s mesmeric
transformation into exactly the sort of novelty hoofer one would expect to find
right at home in Vaudeville or, more directly, London’s musical hall mĂ©lange of
aspiring hopefuls with more salable cheek than talent. The chief problem with The Boy Friend is Ken Russell cannot
decide whether to evoke the 1920’s or 30’s, and toggling between these very
stylishly distinct and diametrically different epochs is more discombobulating
than anything else; particularly since the movie’s production design manages to
vet, but then blur these artistic lines over and over again, and finally, into
a fundamentally vulgar bit of camp that does justice to neither. Worse, there
appears to be very little distinction between the lowbrow and stage bound
sketches being performed in this West End theater by a Brit-born repertory
company of old hams and young hopefuls, and, the over-inflated re-imagining of
their acts in tandem by De Thrill (Vladek Sheybal); the oily Hollywood producer,
come to see the show but looking, in his pinstriped zoot suit and fedora, far
more like a cheap knockoff of the speakeasy gangster
than thirties merchant of dreams from that town made of tinsel.
It ought to be
pointed out the movie’s plot does not parallel the stagecraft; the latter entirely
set on the French Riviera at the Villa Caprice where Maisie, the girls (Dulcie,
Nancy, Fay), Hortense, the maid and Mme Dubonnet, proprietress of a finishing
school for young ladies, all plan to attend a carnival ball; a rife spot for
meeting eligible bachelors. One of Mme Dubonnet’s pupils, Polly Browne is a shy
wallflower desperately hoping to fall in love with…hmmm. She has concocted an
imaginary ‘boyfriend’ to keep all
basic inquiries at bay. Only now, she has to produce the fellow she has built
up into a veritable paragon of virtues. Meanwhile, Polly’s widowed dad, Percy,
arrives, only to learn Mme Dubonnet is an old flame whose passion for him never
entirely cooled. In desperation, Polly bribes Tony, an errand boy at the hotel
she is staying at, to be her date. But she later lies to him about being poor.
The couple are about to kiss when Hortense discovers them. Polly implores
Hortense to remain silent and, after some cajoling, she agrees.
Enter the
‘aging rouĂ©’, Lord Hubert Brockhurst with his overbearing wife and the rigidly
mannered best friend, Percival Browne. These characters are strictly played for
comic relief and have little, if anything, to do with the central plot – such
as it is. Alas, the Brockhursts recognize Tony too. Embarrassed, he runs off.
Inexplicably, everyone assumes he is a common thief. At the carnival ball, Bobby proposes to
Maisie. Tony and Hortense run into each other again. She scolds him for running
away and furthermore, explains that Polly’s devotion to him is genuine. Tony
endeavors to see if this is the case. He disguises himself and attends the
carnival ball, asking Polly for a dance. When she replies she cannot proceed to
the promenade with a stranger, he gingerly kisses her before revealing his true
identity. From across the room, Lord and Lady Brockhurst recognize Tony as
their long lost son who left home to make his own way in the world. Polly is
elated, as Tony will now be quite acceptable to her family. She reveals to Tony
that she is rich too. As the clock strikes midnight, Percy and Mme Dubonnet
announce their own engagement, having rekindled the embers of their long-ago
romance. Earlier, Maisie, Dulcie,
Nancy and Fay rather standoffishly refused to entertain similar proposals of
marriage from some very eligible suitors. Now, perhaps fearing the specter, to
remain the only ‘old maids’ in the bunch, they willingly throw themselves at
these boys’ heads. The play concludes in merriment and a reprise of several of
the hit songs.
To this
musical mélange, Ken Russell has added an unnecessary backstage minuet of even
more badly bungled courtship dances; Twiggy’s Polly is now the mousy assistant
stage manager of this bumbling theatrical troop, treated with general disdain
by these tired old hams; Percy Parkhill (Bryan Pringle – who also doubles as
the show within a show’s Percival Browne) is the sideshow who thinks himself
the whole circus. Toward Polly he is contemptuous and salty. Parkhill’s wife,
Moyra (Moyra Fraser, a.k.a. Madame Dubonnet, is more forgiving, perhaps knowing
something of a young woman’s perceived place in the outside world. Likewise, stage
manager, Max Mandeville (Max Adrian – doubling for Lord Brockhurst) is caustic
and condescending, repeatedly usurping Polly’s faith in herself after the
show’s star, Rita (Glenda Jackson) tearfully reports in with a broken ankle. It
will be a very poor show indeed, Max reasons, although perhaps not as
disappointing as the audience turn out – or lack thereof - for their
performance. More’s the pity for Max,
since he has it on good authority Hollywood producer/director, De Thrill has
come to take in their little golden afternoon matinee, presumably with plans to
buy up the property and turn it into a big and splashy Hollywood musical. Maisie immediately launches into her passion
play for De Thrill’s affections; unaware he is gay and thus hardly interested
in her, either as the lead for his new movie or romantically, despite her
pretentious flirtations with him in French. Maisie convinces Tommy to abstain
from his usual full-on performance of the Charleston, rather insincerely hoping
to wow De Thrill with her moves. But fellow player, Alphonse (Murray Melvin)
exposes Maisie’s ruse and thus, the dance off between these two bitter rivals
begins. Interestingly, Christopher
Gable’s Tony and Twiggy’s Polly are the least fully fleshed out of these
backstage characters; she, incessantly pining for his attention; he, congenial
with his praise, but actually somewhat more interested in exploring multiple
‘friendships’ with the other chorines.
Russell might
have even had his way here, convincing the audience of the double exposure in
these charged flagrante delictos, if only he did not deviate as frequently into
a series of often bizarre pantomime ‘dream
sequences’; meant, presumably as representations of each character’s genuine
feelings, otherwise guarded and/or masked by reality. The most grotesquely mismanaged
of these is the overplayed and overly long Grecian bacchanal, taking place in a
pastoral wooded glen, populated by virtually all of the stage show’s cast;
Tommy, the winged and arrow-slinging Cupid-esque purveyor of love; Maisie up to
her old tricks in her grand seduction of Tony, pouring drugged wine down his gullet,
and Max, curiously misrepresented as a pan-fluted satyr, carrying off an
inebriated and unconscious Polly to his grotto; Polly spared deflowering by
Zeus’ impromptu pelting of the cast with thunderbolts. Russell’s other ‘dream
sequences’ – ‘Poor Little Pierrette’
and his ‘around the world in 80 days’
homage staged in tandem with the stagecraft’s performance of the title tune
throw everything but the proverbial ‘kitchen sink’ at the screen; a real
hodgepodge of dead ended, if thoroughly ambitious snippets to boggle the mind
with their spellbinding loudness.
Exactly what
jalopy-driving college kids, majorette-clad chorines tapping against a backdrop
of the American flag, or Twiggy, re-fashioned as the living embodiment of The
Spirit of Ecstasy; a Rolls-Royce hood ornament, have in common or, more importantly,
contribute to the lyrics of Sandy Wilson’s charming little tune, remains open
for discussion. Clearly, Russell is going for some sort of visual tome, neither
painterly nor prescient, but simply ‘out there’ for conspicuous consumption.
Yet, Sandy Wilson’s lithe lyrics tend to fair far better when left to their own
accord, a simple setting, either confined to the stage show within this show,
and, finessed mostly by Christopher Gable and Twiggy’s rather refreshingly
naive musical stylings, as in the rather charming, ‘A Room in Bloomsbury’. Given the girth of Sandy Wilson’s score, it
also seems rather incongruous of Russell to have added two Nacio Herb
Brown/Arthur Freed ditties from the twenties; All I Do Is Dream of You, and You
Are My Lucky Star – especially since his satire increasingly bends toward
extolling the virtues and vices of thirties movie musicals.
There was a
time when MGM’s clout and courage alone would have been sufficient to mount
such a production as this. But in April,
1970, after an aggressive takeover of Associated British Picture Corporation and
the lucrative acquisition of shares in Warner Bros., with their fingers in a
lot of other pies (ITV, Thames Television and Elstree Studios), EMI signed a
co-production agreement with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. Ever since Metro’s takeover
by Las Vegas financier, Kirk Kerkorian in 1969, the studio had been looking for
ways to streamline its own sprawling worldwide facilities and shore up its
badly hemorrhaging debt. In Hollywood, this meant dismantling the once titanic
studio, selling off its back lot to condo development and props to the highest
bidder in a heart-breaking auction of nostalgia, and, as Kerkorian later put it
to his stockholders, rebranding MGM as “…a
hotel company and a relatively insignificant producer of motion pictures.” In
England, MGM sold off its Borehamwood production facilities, moving quietly
into EMI's Elstree Studio. Both companies planned to co-distribute and co-produce
films partly financed by MGM. And although the aggressive marketing plan, at
least on paper, included six to eight movies per annum, the eventual trickle of
product and profits that emerged as a direct result from this teetering
alliance yielded less than three yearly; The
Boy Friend among them.
If only the
movie version of The Boy Friend had
been a resounding success. Alas, artistically it is a real mixed bag, full of
only occasionally interesting anomalies, a lot of false starts and the sporadic
misfire. Ken Russell’s ambition to reinvigorate the Hollywood musical by giving
it the artistic equivalent of an electrical cardioversion jolt has the exact
opposite effect; placing Sandy Wilson’s lissome deference for the 1920’s on
perpetual life support. While the cast is often inspired, they tend to play
down and muddy the innocence and sweetness of the piece as more outlandish
sex-starved vulgarity than sublime exaltation and/or tribute. We get a lot of
noise and some colorful staging. But the very heart and soul of this fragile
story has been excised with excruciating surgical precision; Russell
telescopically focused on always unearthing its crass lampoon where the real
lump in the throat of human tenderness ought to have emerged. Twiggy can sing and she can also dance. But she is tragically incapable of emoting anything
beyond a pout. Christopher Gable shows off his stunning capacity to stage and execute
the dances. Yet his efforts are hampered by Russell’s constant toggling between
the imaginative choreography gleaned from one image, incongruously pasted onto
– and worse – decidedly plastered over the next. His multi-perspective approach
to both songs and story does not offer variety of perspective per say, as much
as it dilutes Sandy Wilson’s light-hearted live show into a top-heavy, rather
than top flight movie entertainment. In
the end, The Boy Friend fails because it lacks that essential kernel of
humanity behind all its grandiloquence and cleverness.
We have virtually
no complaints about The Boy Friend
on Blu-ray; the Warner Archive (WAC) achieving another stunner in 1080p. The
movie was shortened by 25 minutes for its U.S. theatrical release. But this new
to Blu restores virtually all of that excised footage; also the picture’s
Intermission and entr’acte. If you are a fan of this film, then you will
sincerely want to snatch this one up tout suite. The Boy Friend has been given an immaculate and eye-popping
transfer. Colors are rich beyond measure, and we get some gorgeous detail in
costumes, hair, and close-ups. Contrast is superb and a light smattering of
film grain only adds to the splendor in David Watkin’s gorgeous cinematography.
Age-related artifacts are absent. Apart from an occasionally shimmer in the
fine pin-stripes of De Thrill’s suit, there is really nothing to complain about
here. Wow!...and thank you! WAC has also
gone the extra mile for a new 5.1 DTS audio, sounding fresh and bombastic as
ever. Extras are limited to a very grainy vintage featurette produced as a
promo while Russell was still shooting the picture; presented in 1080p also –
nicely done. We also get an original theatrical trailer. Bottom line: while I
am not a fan of The Boy Friend, I
am, as ever, a champion of WAC’s efforts to bring forth both movie gems and some
of their fallen idols from their extensive back catalog. So, bravo, kudos and keep ‘em coming!
FILM RATING (out of 5 – 5 being the best)
3
VIDEO/AUDIO
5+
EXTRAS
1
Comments